1
DestroyerofCobwebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just my .02c, the percentage of gun owners who are 'Fudds' has gone way down over the last couple decades.

They're still out there for sure, but I think most have realized that the left's idea of reasonable, isn't.

5
DestroyerofCobwebs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Say a prayer for those poor kids, who just lost both of their parents under tragic circumstances.

Awful.

3
DestroyerofCobwebs 3 points ago +3 / -0

You might be surprised how many people that have never shot a magnum revolver, do this. Especially for guys with large hands, it sometimes feels like a more natural way to hold a gun, doubly so if it's a compact.

If they try it with a magnum revolver, they get renamed to stumpy.

4
DestroyerofCobwebs 4 points ago +4 / -0

i believe the atf can come knocking on your door to inspect your home/life whenever they want.

Only if you're a home based FFL can they do that, and even then there are lots of restrictions on it.

Regular Title 2 firearm owner? No, you don't give up your fourth and fifth amendment protections to own an MG/SBS/SBR/Suppressor/AOW. ATF ever shows up at your door on a fishing expedition, you tell them to get lost.

3
DestroyerofCobwebs 3 points ago +3 / -0

Do you want a may-issue background check system, as opposed to the shall-issue one we have today?

Because this is how you get a may-issue background check. Think ATF Form 4 approval, but even more stringent. Because even that is shall-issue.

No one should be liable for a shooters actions, except the shooter. There are exceptions, like of you gave them the gun knowing they were going to shoot up a school with it.

This isn't something our side should compromise on. Liability lies with the shooter, period.

3
DestroyerofCobwebs 3 points ago +3 / -0

De-mystifying guns for kids, which we used to do in this country, would go a long way towards helping kids understand that it's just a tool, not some empowering manhood extension.

Over time, that would result in less gun violence. Wouldn't eliminate it, but it would help.

2
DestroyerofCobwebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not how they're going to do it, though. They're not stupid enough to do an Australia style ban & confiscation in the US. Instead, they'll pass universal, 'may approve' background checks. First for guns, then for ammo purchases. The criteria for approval will get more stringent, and more unknowable, over time. And if you fail the BGC, one time, they'll come for you and all the guns you have. So it's not you and a bunch of like minded people against .gov, it's just you.

And since they want a waiting period on all purchases too, you won't know you failed the BGC until they're already at your door.

That's why they love this BGC & waiting period argument so much. It sounds so innocuous, but in reality it's all the mechanisms they need to isolate gun owners, and eventually ban gun ownership.

2
DestroyerofCobwebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

And yes, contrary to what Potatus said on Tuesday, you absolutely could own a cannon under the original understanding of the 2nd amendment.

This moron has apparently never heard of a Privateer. Or the dozens of well armed, privately held trading posts that dotted the American wilderness both before and after the revolution.

2
DestroyerofCobwebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

If I wanted to hear from the post-modern feminist peanut gallery, I'd be on Twitter or Reddit.

Where you should go back to.

12
DestroyerofCobwebs 12 points ago +12 / -0

Government employees should have never been granted the right to 5th amendment protections for their actions in the government's name. All that does is effectively give the government itself a 5th amendment right, against the citizens. Which was clearly never the intent.

7
DestroyerofCobwebs 7 points ago +7 / -0

With diesel prices this high, helicopter rides are temporarily suspended. The recommended, green alternative is using a large trebuchet to launch the leftist into a solid object.

2
DestroyerofCobwebs 2 points ago +2 / -0

Little does he know, we never did believe in democracy. The idea of letting anyone who can fog a mirror have a say, is weapons grade stupid. The mob isn't just fickle, it's retarded.

5
DestroyerofCobwebs 5 points ago +5 / -0

The law does indeed need to be laid down.

4
DestroyerofCobwebs 4 points ago +4 / -0

The days of people starting a Youtube channel because they're passionate about a topic and want to interact with like-minded people are largely over. Everyone has an angle. They're either using it for marketing purposes (this guy), saying scandalous shit for clickbait, or some other scheme. Nothing against them, it's just not a genuine thing anymore.

1
DestroyerofCobwebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

Does the brown stripe stand for shit packing?

Inquiring minds and all.

5
DestroyerofCobwebs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Because they have no incentive to.

What kind of corporation would voluntarily expose itself to more liability, for no benefit? The government has been their willing partner in this fraud, from the start.

35
DestroyerofCobwebs 35 points ago +35 / -0

Still trying to figure out how provoking thermonuclear war makes me safer.

1
DestroyerofCobwebs 1 point ago +1 / -0

A strong market requires roughly equal supply and demand. That's as true for employment as it is for wheat.

What we have right now is the opposite of a strong market. It's a sellers (employees) market for sure, but that doesn't make it strong.

Businesses are having to permanently close their doors because they can't find help. In what universe is that a strong job market?

12
DestroyerofCobwebs 12 points ago +12 / -0

I don't even care, I just think it's funny that this guy gets over six minutes into the video before he drops the bomb that he's literally a direct competitor to BRCC.

Fuck BRCC, but that's shady. At least he did mention it. That's something, I guess.

5
DestroyerofCobwebs 5 points ago +5 / -0

They may be the same thing, chemically. Legally, one of them is an experimental drug, the other has been approved by the FDA.

14
DestroyerofCobwebs 14 points ago +14 / -0

The reputation of the public health agencies is permanently damaged. For my .02c, it wasn't just the lockdowns and other BS, what they did with COVID testing is what really tore the covers off.

When you give neurotics and hypochondriacs the ability to self-test, and subsidize the tests with government funds, they will test until the test says they're positive, which it will do eventually because of false positive results.

We have known this for decades. It's why hospitals and health insurance companies will not allow patients to self-diagnose or order tests for themselves. It's why doctors often refuse to allow labs to release test results to patients directly; have to go through the office, so they can provide some medical context.

To have willingly gone along with giving these mentally ill people the ability to test themselves at home. Hell, they didn't just go along with it, they encouraged it!

Never to be trusted again, at least not until it's burned down to cinders and rebuilt.

5
DestroyerofCobwebs 5 points ago +5 / -0

Remember that cartoon Elon posted a few weeks back, of the middle-of-the-road liberal who is now on the right because the radicals moved so far left?

Thing is those guys are still, fundamentally, liberals.

7
DestroyerofCobwebs 7 points ago +7 / -0

Several old friends. I still consider them friends in a sense just because I've known them for decades, but haven't spoken to them in years and may never again.

I just have no use for watching someone slowly succumb to self-pity and the socialist thought processes it spawns. When people lose the sense of agency over their own outcome, nothing good happens.

18
DestroyerofCobwebs 18 points ago +18 / -0

He's still a cuck. All he's trying to do is re-focus the Democrats so they can be more successful with their climate BS and non-trans SJW BS.

He's not our friend.

view more: Next ›