What did the guy say that every one of us didn't already know was true? We all get after the left for their outrage culture, but isn't this basically the same thing?
Who doesn't know the media is 100% propaganda, at this point? I don't think it's news to anyone. Hearing them admit it, also not news, Jeff fucking Zucker himself has admitted it on tape.
I guess I just don't get the gotcha stuff anymore. The commies aren't hiding it, because they aren't trying to hide anymore. They don't have to.
Get back on tha plantation, boy.
There is no human belief more ignorant than thinking the peace will last.
You can't murder a communist, because they aren't human. Communists are like Orks. They have vaguely humanoid features, can act and behave in ways similar to a human, but still, not human.
Killing a communist is more like taking game out of season without a license.
There is nothing on earth more satisfying than watching the meme of Tyson releasing that red ball on a rope and getting domed with it while he sits there smiling like a tard.
I know it's fake, and I don't care.
You need a lawyer, and finding one who will represent you for a case like that isn't easy, so you should be looking already.
In the meantime, start recording every interaction you have with your employer.
This shouldn't really be a surprise to anyone, and I can promise you journalists get a chuckle out of anyone being outraged by these statements.
They're all taught in college that objectivism is dead, that it's their job to be partial, to advance a narrative.
Exposing journalists for this isn't going to change anything, they already admit it openly. If people want to open the eyes of the public, the goal has to shift to exposing who controls the narrative they are pushing. That is a piece of the puzzle journalists don't want to talk about, at all.
Idiocracy isn't funny anymore, it's just the truth.
In a truth-free world, irrefutable proof is easily refuted.
There is no such thing as unimpeachable evidence anymore. He could have video tape of GWB talking the plan over with OBL, and we'd just be told it was a sophisticated deep fake. And maybe it would be.
Most older Republican voters don't understand the idea of a political boycott. These folks aren't onTwitter/FB, they aren't seeing the censorship, so to them it's a non-issue.
This topic came up at my Easter dinner. Every one of my older relatives is a Republican, and not one of them is going to give up MLB, or Coke, or anything else.
They've lived their entire lives in a country where corporate Fascism wasn't a thing, at least not out in the open. They don't have the mental tools to process this stuff.
Stop trying to save them, and start figuring out how you can take advantage of these people. Stupid is supposed to hurt.
The Chinese call it Baizuo. Seems appropriate that they give this idiocy a name, since they created it.
Van Jones: "Since committing a mass murder or act of terrorism is an inherently white act, the attacker was white at the time of the attack."
Didn't say they shouldn't be allowed to vote, just that I don't oppose roadblocks to voting that could be perceived as difficult for homeless people to overcome. So long as it's not a blanket ban on homeless voting.
Not talking about roadblocks for the sake of it, either. But if society wants to say it'll illegal for outside organizations to bus people to a voting station, because we think a person should have to put forth some actual effort to go out and vote, I'm fine with that. Yes that impacts the homeless, but it also impacts the elderly. Same with mail in voting.
Far as I'm concerned, mail-in voting should be restricted to active-duty military personnel, and people who can prove they will be overseas on election day. Everyone else needs to get their ass to the polls.
Contrary to popular opinion, there is no 'right to vote' guaranteed in the US Constitution. 15th simply says you can't be denied the vote based upon your race.
We need a lot more people being completely honest about this. Enough with the coyness and trying to pander to leftist talking points.
I am completely, totally OK with the idea of making it harder for people to vote.
I'm not OK with the idea of making it harder for people to vote, based upon the physical characteristics of their race or gender. As long as whatever roadblocks we put up are the same for everyone, works for me.
No society that wants to survive would ever allow inveterate drug addicts, homeless people, and felons to vote unobstructed. Some people are anti-social. If you let anti-social people decide what your social systems look like, you'll end up with anti-social social systems, and your social systems will fail.
I will never consent to a business relationship with a corporation that the government has pre-indemnified against any injury they cause me, up to and including my death.
Progressive liberalism is about freedom from responsibility.
What is it with all these liberal women and their totally inappropriate laughter?
Oh, yea. They're on drugs.
She's not wrong that we are basically being governed by drug addicts and their constant excuse making and non-existent morals.
Doesn't make her any less of a piece of shit. I promise you she hates everyone on this site.
Good. I hope they get out into the burbs like they've been threatening, too. People need to wake the fuck up, and it's obvious less subtle hints aren't cutting it.
I hope they end up with a hung jury (not guilty isn't in the cards, folks), and one of the jurors who refused to convict goes public and says the reason they refused was because of the overly emotional, manipulative case put together by the prosecution.
That they were absolutely willing to convict at the start of the trial, but the state spent it's entire case appealing to emotion, and presented almost no real evidence against Chauvin, and that's why they couldn't do it.
The irony is that mens high fashion (suits, top hats, ties, scarves, chesterfield coats, etc) almost exclusively has its roots in military uniforms. People today think this stuff is all function following form, but historically it was the opposite. Mens fashion looks the way it does because back in those days, these were the things they discovered wore well and looked good while doing it.
By the time Cary Grant was dressing like this, the original purpose for this whole getup was lost to history, paving the way for fruitloop on the right to make everyone barf.
It wasn't faggotry that destroyed mens fashion. It was air conditioning.
There's also no reason to believe every single person moving here is a leftist.
I wish I believed that, but what I've seen with my own eyes tells me the opposite. In fact, between people in the back range leaving since the state government doesn't give a damn about them anymore, to the crush of people that have turned Denver and Boulder into the same city, if I had to guess the rate is slightly worse than 100%. Whatever small percentage of new residents aren't commies is more than made up for with natives from the HWY 50 and 160 corridors leaving the state.
I said on this site months ago that the most blatant cases of systemic vote fraud happened in Colorado, but no one was paying attention to it because we all expected Colorado to go blue anyway.
I'm not sure it would have, if the election had been held fairly.
Colorado is highly dependent on out of state student voters to keep the state blue. All of the major Colorado colleges had closed campuses throughout 2020, and that included the dorms.
Since the schools were closed, there weren't any jobs in those college towns, either. No way in hell those kids all stayed in town the whole year, they went back home to live with mommy and daddy in Texas and California.
But what happened to vote totals, in every one of these college towns? They went UP, compared to 2016. One of them, OK. But ALL OF THEM???
We're talking about small cities in many cases, places with a full time resident population of 50k or less, that balloon up to 100k+ while school is in session.
Colorado law is crystal clear on this topic. You must be a permanent resident of the state, actually living in the state at the time of the election, in order to vote. What happened is that the communist Colorado Secretary of State simply decided that she was going to reinterpret that law to mean something completely contrary to it's plain language.
And no one caught it until it was too late.
Do they have to be on a public roadway, or can I run them over anywhere?
Someone has to ask the important questions.