-2
Detectivedan2 -2 points ago +1 / -3

I’m sorry you don’t understand. I wasn’t asking, I am TELLING you why he wasn’t arrested.

There seems to be some kind of misinformation. Kyle didn’t go to police to turn himself in. Which is actually another angle that will be pursued at trial. “If Kyle said he was going to police after one shooting, why didn’t he after 3?”

Like I’ve said before, there’s a lot more information to come. Possibly 3 shooters, a shooter on a rooftop, a traffic stop, wakie-talkies, 2 new videos.

2
Detectivedan2 2 points ago +2 / -0

That “statement” was referring to HIS statement of events.

  1. Kyle fires 2 shots in his direction
  2. Gaige pulls firearm and runs a few paces with the firearm drawn
  3. Gaige raises both hands in surrender
  4. Kyle shoots

The wishing he shot was 2. In lieu of “runs a few paces”

ACCORDING TO GAIGE, not me, GAIGE

3
Detectivedan2 3 points ago +3 / -0

You’re correct, but in practice it doesn’t work that way, unless you’re arrested with the firearm. For example, in 90% of rap videos they show a felon with a gun. An arrest post facto is very rare

2
Detectivedan2 2 points ago +7 / -5

I’m not here to debate or add my opinion, just explain “why” Gaige hasn’t been arrested. The reason is because there is no evidence to arrest Gaige. Weather you believe they’re lying or not every eye-witness SAYS Gaige pulled out the firearm AFTER Kyle fired and there is no evidence otherwise. As far as possession of a firearm by a felon, 9/10 that’s a secondary or time of arrest charge. Gaige was never arrested with a firearm. It does happen, but is rare. For example, if you were to post a picture on the Donald with a firearm and we knew you were a felon, chances are slim we’d come and arrest you. That is WHY

So there is nothing to “detain” him for.

2
Detectivedan2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Im not sure what you mean. I NEVER said a sniper shot him. What I said there was men on a roof behind him with guns, that is all I said. I didn’t say he fired a single shot. Here is my quote

Believe it or not, there was at least two snipers, yes snipers on scene. We interviewed two business owners that let men with rifles on their roof. We also believe there is a good chance of multiple shooters but not from the muzzle flash person. We are thinking the fifth and final shot that punctured the lung was from a roof from behind

Two crouched on the roof of a building, sniper style. Two or three others stood guard over the lot

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2020/08/31/witnesses-kenosha-shooting-see-kyle-rittenhouse-shoot-protest-jacob-blake/5675987002/

1
Detectivedan2 1 point ago +1 / -0

He feigned surrender hands up, then reached for the gun his waistband

“If” this is true, that means he was only documenting the event and only pulled out his weapon after being shot at. I’m just going by your scenario. We don’t know when the gun was pulled. To put it clearly, we are not saying this is what happened.

There is two very different possibilities

  1. Gaige chased after Kyle with a loaded gun
  2. Gaige was filming and pulled a gun to defend himself after Kyle fired at him

Editing: under scenario 1, I believe it’s a clear case of self defense Under scenario 2, I think charges will stick and that will have to be hashed out in court.

3
Detectivedan2 3 points ago +4 / -1

Not the case. Gaigs’ shooting also raises suspicion. If you watch the video from 3rd person then watch gaigs’ POV video then sync the gun shots so they are basically two different views of one event it gives a 180 of the events I’ve seen proposed here. What WE see is when Gaige had a SINGLE hand up in the video (3rd person) it HAD to be the cellphone as he was filming at the same time (POV). What further complicates this is it’s clear from the 3rd person video it was his right hand with the phone. It’s also clear that at some point he put the phone in his left hand and the gun in his right. We don’t know when that occurred. I’m going to ask if I can post that video today

1
Detectivedan2 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t know what that means, sorry

2
Detectivedan2 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not true. A LOT of people know this information

5
Detectivedan2 5 points ago +5 / -0

That “he” killed? Not sure. Rosenbaum was the first “shooting” victim (with the red shirt) the shot that killed him was the one the back and despite what you may hear, we don’t know who fired that shot, yet. Or if we’ll ever be certain frankly

15
Detectivedan2 15 points ago +15 / -0

There were also eye witnesses on the roof. I’m also fairly certain NONE of the ground eyewitness will be used in court. We have deemed them all to not be credible. Witnesses from “both sides”

8
Detectivedan2 8 points ago +8 / -0
  1. I don’t think I can tell.

  2. Nothing at all, really

  3. Definitely not from what they know. They get the information from us and I couldn’t call it either way. I’m not just saying this to appear neutral, I would tell you, I’m honestly 50/50.

Edit: I’m not trying to withhold in formation, everything I told you, about 200 people already know. Telling what’s was in the bag, limits me to maybe 15 people. Every one in this building knows about the snipers. We actually walked around to ransoms (in the department) “where do those pops sound like they came from”.

8
Detectivedan2 8 points ago +8 / -0

You should know by Friday. Who’s was it would be the correct question to ask.

11
Detectivedan2 11 points ago +12 / -1

Yes and no. I’m not saying what is supposed to happen but this is how it happens.

Say, a bank robbery happens at 3pm and we have a 100% positive I.d, lets say via camera. The perp was also on Xbox live at 3pm. It’s not uncommon for our assignment to be “find me evidence that “x” wasn’t on Xbox at 3pm”

8
Detectivedan2 8 points ago +8 / -0

This is correct but it wasn’t a brick.

11
Detectivedan2 11 points ago +11 / -0

There isn’t much to spill. What do you want to know? There really isn’t much information I could “leak”. I’m almost certain all our evidence will be given to the press by Friday. I know the “sniper” story for sure

7
Detectivedan2 7 points ago +7 / -0

Absolutely. The back bullet and three rifles are being tested

9
Detectivedan2 9 points ago +9 / -0

I misspoke. The instructions were more like “ the second shooting isn’t a priority, mainly focus on the first shooting”

11
Detectivedan2 11 points ago +11 / -0

Hello, I barely understand the other questions, I’m not ignoring them I just don’t know the answers. The answer to this question is “I don’t know.”, yet. There’s a lot of evidence people aren’t privy to yet (the sniper story will be out by Friday). Someone involved had a traffic stop. There was something, not a firearm, that a officer saw. There was also a level of coordination through Wilkie-talkies. I can tell you we don’t have any evidence of Kyle having one. There isn’t much more to say, every video is grainy, and ballistics haven’t been done and almost every eyewitness has lied. The last thing I can tell you is the round to the back has been recovered as well as three, yes three ar-15s and ballistics are in progress

48
Detectivedan2 48 points ago +48 / -0

Hello guys, new account as I only meant to drop the information and never return, I made the password and forgot it. I felt I needed to post because I see a lot of misinformation.

Believe it or not, there was at least two snipers, yes snipers on scene. We interviewed two business owners that let men with rifles on their roof. We also believe there is a good chance of multiple shooters but not from the muzzle flash person. We are thinking the fifth and final shot that punctured the lung was from a roof from behind. There’s also two videos that haven’t been released and we have recovered the projectile thrown at Kyle. When you guys hear the official story it’s looks like it’s from a movie. Radios, two “snipers” firing from opposite directions, a fire cracker, even what was thrown by Rosenbaum is “peculiar”.