3
Di8ital 3 points ago +3 / -0

Thank you

9
Di8ital 9 points ago +9 / -0

Can someone explain this in English 😎

2
Di8ital 2 points ago +2 / -0

Any legal eagles that can summarize this into a short paragraph. As I read it they thought it is ok to change the law because of you have a problem with it you can challenge the change after we have illegally decided who won based on our illegal change?

5
Di8ital 5 points ago +5 / -0

We will find out this dude probably scraped public I foto prove voter fraud and so they will nail his ass to the wall. You just don't do that to the Democrats

3
Di8ital 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there a recording of the event

3
Di8ital 3 points ago +3 / -0

Why can't we use FISA warrants to get at the information. All you need is a person you believe participated in the fraud

1
Di8ital 1 point ago +1 / -0

The FBI can determine who printed it as I believe they catalog different paints or their chemical compositions

2
Di8ital 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tucker can stay ignorent and see history pass him by

1
Di8ital 1 point ago +1 / -0

How does this work and how does it help the president. I am asking to be better understand

4
Di8ital 4 points ago +5 / -1

I don't understand how come the president is not aware of this or cannot find out. If you can't get a straight answer fire people till you do

4
Di8ital 4 points ago +4 / -0

Did they at least say why they rejected it? If you lock people outside how do you argue they had meaningful acceas

1
Di8ital 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. But I want both and show my family members the truth of what I'd happening. We are on the same side

2
Di8ital 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sue grammer police. I think my point still stands. Criminals need to be brought to justice

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›