every part? You mean covering the arms and legs too? the entirety? Because showing someone with a black box besides wouldn't be incriminating. You need to see at least part of one of the limbs for the photo to be truly damning.
but, again my question is if heavily censored would they still be illegal to possess and distribute? Because if laws do exist against such heavily censored material being possessed and distributed, then those are pedo protection laws.
does she vote for kamala's policies? Joe has said over 100 million americans died from guns 100+million americans died from covid, he's also said 4 more years of george, he's also said he's running for the senate on multiple occassions. A few days ago he had a mental breakdown and his managers had to pull him away from the crowds.
He will be removed from office within the first 1-2 years. He's also a doublespeaking liar, promising one thing in one state and the opposite in another, all while being nebulous about his policies.
there were later texts that emerged from the uncle, and joe. They 'claim' to not believe it but want to silence the mother I think
Yes, it is complete BS that if the genitalia and faces are censored it is problematic to share. If there are laws against heavily censored cp, I'd imagine they are there to protect elite pedophiles from being found out as the fbi can run cover for them and claim the photos don't involve the elite.
Imagine how many pedophiles would be found out if any time the pedos shared imagery, it became heavily censored and distributed as evidence to the public. The adults in the pictures would out countless ones.
Where are they from? The hunter laptop? The chinese blackmail hdds that were being released? Some new source?