Okay, but let's also get a signature verification on mail in ballots. The same way Obama won his state senate seat in 1996.
God bless the audio magicians who got this! 👩🏿🗯️🗨️👩🏿 ✨🎥✨🧙♂️🎵🎶
I kind of love her. ❤️
Three letter agencies having to buy American after decades of outsourcing.
info from their website. if anyone has an current number of courts refusing I will update
Made on canva.com in minutes.
Info from hereistheevidence.com
Weaponize our screens with information.
stop don't come back. ~Willy Wonka
ONE if by Bike, TWO if by Boat 🚴♂️💡 ⚔️ 🛥️ 💡💡 🇺🇸
Lurker making an account to give feedback:
The videos need editing for clarification. It looks like your data team write research papers for conferences and attach a video expecting peer review from other data guys who draw their own conclusions. Present the problem first, so I know what to watch for in the video. Your video summaries should be their introduction.
Vote switching video: The video starts with "you went to bed, and then this happened" but that is not the video's focus. The video's key point is at 3:20 "Votes are always additive, they should never go negative." Start with that and hammer it home. Make the point at the beginning of the video, so I know what to expect. "You count votes and report them. There is no legal way to subtract votes from the count." The trailer ending data would be better to draw interest at the beginning saying, "Votes were subtracted in batches at least 611 times in 33 states on election night" (if you have an estimated number of total votes, that will help drive the data home). You can still put the state list at the end but add a call to action asking, "Was your state one of them? Was your vote one of them? Contact your legislature and demand they investigate election fraud."
Arizona: Glitchy intro does not matter and slows down information. Reading social media posts on video is hard. Tell me what the video is about in the opening. I am barely getting an idea at 54 seconds of what I am going to watch. I do not understand the graphs or data. You are not going to teach me JSON in time to form an opinion. This video states what I am looking for at 5:24, and it is confusing, "votes shouldn't be added and decremented. They shouldn't be switched either across candidates or within candidates, and if they do switch, there better be a good reason for it." Clarify this.
Key point of Arizona video: Votes should be added, never subtracted. Votes should never change from one candidate to another or from one precinct to another. But we found 790,175 votes change in Arizona's official election data feed used by Arizona's Secretary of State, Katie Hobbs. Changing votes is election fraud, and Hobbs certified it.
Rudy: 👴🚬This is the worst censorship in American Histor- Big Tech: ❌ Rudy: 🔇🤬