1
DirtyName 1 point ago +2 / -1

Got to hand it to Bannon, though.

He's staking what's left of his reputation on this, and he's talking some mad game.

-2
DirtyName -2 points ago +1 / -3

Well, dude, I'm a Christian, and it's entirely fair to say that Christ was a "criminal" killed for his troublemaking.

Because that's the official story as provided by the Sanhedrin.

Context matters. And yes, I realize Ben is Jewish...but still, let's have the full context.

1
DirtyName 1 point ago +2 / -1

And that's why I respect him. He's smart. He's not going to jump at the first bait dangled in front of him and rush to judgement.

No one should.

If he has a flaw, its that he gave the other side more credit than they deserve. I think he's reached the bottom of his patience tank on that one.

-1
DirtyName -1 points ago +1 / -2

Pedes, be careful.

The story contains no links, but lots of text that looks like links.

We are hungry for facts, but sadly many sleazebags exist out there who are willing to give us what LOOKS like factual information, yet the info cannot be verified.

Think about it. Why would Hal Turner, a conservative talk show host, have this information, but not share the source of it?

Bottom line: it's total bullshit.

Back we go to waiting on Rudy and Bannon to deliver the goods. Sigh.

-7
DirtyName -7 points ago +3 / -10

Where does he say that? THat's not what he posted on Twitter.

In fact, here's the full conversation:

@ggreenwald: I don't think that the emails -- so far -- reveal a huge scandal. They so far just establish standard sleaze and DC corruption.

The huge scandal to me is the blatant rank-closing and cone of silence -- a prohibition -- erected by journalists around this story to defend Biden. 7:09 PM · Oct 19, 2020·Twitter Web App

@sw9700: Replying to: @ggreenwald True. Unless the “big guy” referenced is Biden.

@ggreenwald: Right. It raises questions that could point to serious corruption, but none of that has been established. Part of the problem is that Biden and Hunter know they don't have to answer questions because journalists have made clear that discussing the story is immoral.

10
DirtyName 10 points ago +18 / -8

Yes, he very much dislikes Trump.

But Greenwald also has a reputation as a fair journalist. He puts his principles ahead of his politics, and that's what we're seeing here.

This is a HUGE development, because many of his peers respect him deeply and will be shamed by his comments.

11
DirtyName 11 points ago +12 / -1

Guys, please stop masturbating to Qanon porn.

It's good stuff. It gets me hard, too.

But we've all learned the hard way that masturbating to this stuff can cost us all dearly in our personal lives, and we have Jeffrey Toobout to thank.

4
DirtyName 4 points ago +4 / -0

Again, no.

It's from an April 2016 deposition related to a lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre against Maxwell. Unless Trump did something with Giuffre, it's highly unlikely Trump is even mentioned.

17
DirtyName 17 points ago +17 / -0

Exactly. Nobody thought he would win, nobody was focused on him. You'll recall at the time, Trump was bringing former Clinton victims to debates around this time.

This isn't about Trump,.

9
DirtyName 9 points ago +9 / -0

It doesn't matter. Read the story. It's not about HER.

It's about her DEPOSITION, which has already been recorded and transcribed back in April of 2016.

3
DirtyName 3 points ago +4 / -1

SDNY can't do squat.

The testimony is already in the can, it was taken in April 2016, before Trump was even elected.

30
DirtyName 30 points ago +31 / -1

She can't lie.

Her deposition was taken years ago before Donald Trump was president.

Whatever she said back then is what matters.

6
DirtyName 6 points ago +6 / -0

As sweet as it would be to win California, it really doesn’t matter electorally.

Sounds crazy to say, I know, but let’s face it: if we are winning Cali, we are winning EVERYWHERE.

1
DirtyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

First off that has not happened yet.

Second off, it all depends on how Ten Percent Joe handles it if it turns out to be what the video shows.

It will definitely hurt because most people believe that the apple doesn’t fall far from the tree.

But Biden could easily disavow his sons actions, act hurt, cry, and claim victim status.

2
DirtyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

This.

Metadata that confirms the emails are actually Hunter's, particularly the ones implicating Ten Percent Joe, will be hard to ignore.

I know journalists covering this race that are more than willing to jump on the story, but Giuliani and Bannon are the problem.

They are dripping it out, which is entertaining, but that's also the reason it's getting ignored right now.

Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›