1
DirtyName 1 point ago +2 / -1

Not that it matters one bit, but no, they didn't skip a pizza dinner to volunteer for the campaign.

They quite clearly donated cash to the campaign. That's exactly what this message is all about.

Either Podesta was copied on draft text of a planned fundraising email, and this was him getting a look at it, or he's just on the mail list, and this turned up when someone did a search for mentions of "pizza."

Regardless, this is a nothingburger. It's standard fundraising copy, right down to the font (Courier), which is intentional, because (1) it's considered "friendlier," and (2) it's reminiscent of an actual typewriter, which makes it feel more personalized.

1
DirtyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

Real talk here for a minute:

  1. It is irrelevant how we got the Hunter Biden emails. If they are legit, Sleepy Joe needs to answer for them and the questions should be merciless.

  2. That said, these images all do look like his laptop was hacked. Who takes selfies like this? Nobody. It looks like a webcam hack or something.

6
DirtyName 6 points ago +6 / -0

Batavia Ohio is Trump country, too.

Let's hope the lines are LOOOOOOOOONG.

-7
deleted -7 points ago +10 / -17
2
DirtyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

Of all the posts today, this one made me laugh hardest.

1
DirtyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

To give Sleepy Joe's lawyers time to file the injunction so he doesn't have to actually post them.

13
DirtyName 13 points ago +13 / -0

What’s so absurd is that the guy was caught posting a link to anti-Trump commentary, and they want to ignore the obvious point Trump was making to “fact check” the semantics of whether or not the guy is a card carrying member of a group that doesn’t issue membership cards.

These people are scum of the lowest order.

6
DirtyName 6 points ago +6 / -0

No. That’s still admitting too much. That’s not how they do it.

Mostly false.

While they all suck cocks with jaws in a slackend position, there is not enough evidence to support the assertion that they are slack jawed faggots.

-1
DirtyName -1 points ago +1 / -2

Listen again. You shouldn’t believe your eyes because the title of the post is misleading.

She didn’t say “elderly” she said “elders.”

She’s talking about getting help from a local church leader and the church’s “elders.”

That basically means deacons.

0
DirtyName 0 points ago +5 / -5

I’m here to help.

She’s not talking about “elderly.” She’s talking about church leaders, aka “elders.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elder_(Christianity)

-1
DirtyName -1 points ago +2 / -3

No.

She’s not talking about “elderly people,” she’s talking about church “elders.”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elder_(Christianity)

2
DirtyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

She says “Elders” in a church context. That’s another word for “deacons” not elderly people.

Just FYI.

2
DirtyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

So. Much. This.

All of the same mistakes as before. Only magnified tenfold.

It's gonna be a landslide.

1
DirtyName 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said it was when he was young. So probably years ago when all this madness seemed unthinkable.

2
DirtyName 2 points ago +2 / -0

I keep going back to Audible...my finger keeps hovering over the buy button for this book, every time I see another person get a lifetime ban from Twitter because they dared suggest a trans women isn't actually a woman, or any other basic truth that is verboten to discuss on social media.

I feel like I understand the basic plot, I've heard all the references, know all the terminology, etc.

Is it still worth the read?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›