by zakry59
1
Disagreeable 1 point ago +1 / -0

B A C K P F E I F E N G E S I C H T

4
Disagreeable 4 points ago +4 / -0

Repulsed more by communism because of how sneaky they are. Nazis are straightforward.

1
Disagreeable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or it's entirely possible a Rose Garden is a garden of roses anyway. So it's indirectly implied that its plural. Meh.

1
Disagreeable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Isn't that too specific? A rose. Roses? I don't think whether its plural really matters. Otherwise he would have emphasized it? You could be right.

2
Disagreeable 2 points ago +2 / -0

The news reports that Trump is having his speech at the Rose Garden. It's pretty straight forward.

3
Disagreeable 3 points ago +3 / -0

What this means is that 50% is random. Wearing a mask versus not wearing a mask in this study gives you a 50% chance of getting sick. In other words, equal numbers of mask wearers and non-wearers got sick. It's a coinflip. Random. In other words, no effect. If it were less than 50% that means that wearing a mask gets you sick more often. If it were "greater than 50%," then wearing mask would reduce your chances of getting ill. However, they couldn't show that it was any greater or less than 50%. Random. Thus it makes no difference. Don't worry. It is confusing language. But in statistics this is how this sentence is interpreted.

6
Disagreeable 6 points ago +6 / -0

Huh, and these posts were posted on the 10th. So an eight day prediction. Not bad. And the roses prediction came true too: Trump's speech at the Rose Garden. That was on the 14th? So a four day prediction. Not sure about second claim though. Too vague. So 2/3? Not bad. I believe him.

"Biden's the turkey." What does that mean? He's gonna be cooked and eaten? Oh here, just looked it up: https://www.whitehouse.gov/gobble/

1
Disagreeable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Speechless after a basic ass counter-argument. You gotta find new debate partners. 😆

2
Disagreeable 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't this terrorism? Threats of political violence against family members, etc. for political gain?

2
Disagreeable 2 points ago +2 / -0

u/madly_aloof Additionally, our navy secures all of their trade. At little to no cost to them. None of them have built up a significant naval force, except maybe the UK. The US owns HALF of the world's naval tonnage, and ALL but 2 of the worlds' 15 supercarriers. The UK has two. And China has two "supercarriers."

Because of the Marshall Plan, after the devastation of WWII, none of the former european powers needed to waste their money on water trade protection. They could use everything to rebuild, AND defend the US against the rising USSR threat on land positions for nuclear weapons. So it wasn't only generosity. It was a strategic gambit in the Cold War. "We help you rebuild, you defend your land borders against the USSR, and by proxy defend us from their nuclear umbrella."

As the poster above said, USSR is gone. Mission accomplished. So why are we still paying for them? Inertia, mostly. But Trump is one of the first big signs that the paradigm is catching up to reality.

1
Disagreeable 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's actually statistical. Gen-Z is based because more conservative people tend to have more children. By this logic, then generation after gen-z will be even more based. Leftists will simply die out generation over generation, so long as their ideology is anti-human.

6
Disagreeable 6 points ago +6 / -0

"Even if your product is faulty or suspicious, I will approve it, so long as you give me some of the your profits."

1
Disagreeable 1 point ago +1 / -0

In french, isn't robin aye spelled robinet? French does have instances of ette suffixes that are pronounced "ette". Baguette. I'm not sure this explanation holds. I took a lot of french in school.

1
Disagreeable 1 point ago +1 / -0

Can we verify this and sticky it? This is a great resource.

69
Disagreeable 69 points ago +69 / -0

What, is this the fifth time this has happened? Bunch of Rs won seats on recounts and glitches. 12,000 vote swing in MI back to Trump because of a glitch. Can someone compile this shit?

by Raken
16
Disagreeable 16 points ago +17 / -1

Written in sugandese.

by Raken
25
Disagreeable 25 points ago +26 / -1

DEEZS what on my what?

2
Disagreeable 2 points ago +2 / -0

We'll see. His team is playing this close to the chest. For good reason. Unfortunately that means we get left out of the loop. Fortunately that means his opponents do too.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›