4
DisbandTheCIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

It isn't even a hard negotiation. Literally NATO just has to stop being asshoe.

3
DisbandTheCIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wanted to share this with you.

https://twitter.com/nduley/status/1665011323254497282?t=FlyBQfD-mdnjQEQYqM5beA&s=19

Legalman is great. The chatgpt thing sounds silly but when he goes through it, it makes sense. I think the essence of his message is what's important.

He doesn't see any potential in Trump but he's also extremely cynical.

He talks about much of what has been discussed on here about how the constitution is broken but he goes into how and why it is broken from a legal perspective.

His podcast is good too, I've listened to several.

3
DisbandTheCIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think this system stinks. I'd rather see it fail.

I'm looking forward to ever increasing costs while my nation sinks further into depravity. I'd rather just get on with it.

There's a bunch of money floating around that simply can't be justified. How is that ok?

30
DisbandTheCIA 30 points ago +31 / -1

I like how it's not a bailout because millionaires who cashed out first are not getting the rest of their gambling money back.

1
DisbandTheCIA 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah but direct it properly, Ya know? These guys got paid to pull a stunt and they're now interested in sharing that story. Overall pretty darn awesome.

4
DisbandTheCIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

Same with Twitter.

They're still banning for saying that trans are mentally ill.

Free speech as long as you aren't too honest. Your sensitivities matter unless you're white.

All of it is bullshit there never was a free country.

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe not much - it is a many years old investigation - but it's interesting to me that he could give so much detail. They're still running the same kinds of scams but now they're on message for the establishment media.

https://twitter.com/i/spaces/1ynKOajVNwZJR

3
DisbandTheCIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

They also dodged a wire fraud charge after getting intimate with the feds. I listened to them on a Twitter spaces recording where they detailed it then "technical issues" caused the call to drop out right before they finished their excuses about how some dodgy ads linked to Russian criminals got them raided by the feds.

Krassenjew gave out details of an active federal investigation.

3
DisbandTheCIA 3 points ago +3 / -0

They couldn't even be bothered to make torches.

As soon as they saw the tiki they should've known it was an op or dumb enough to be one.

1
DisbandTheCIA 1 point ago +1 / -0

They managed different headlines this time good for them.

0
DisbandTheCIA 0 points ago +1 / -1

I've been away a while but I could swear that we used to deport faggots like you.

4
DisbandTheCIA 4 points ago +4 / -0

On the surface. They all rely on third parties for the hard stuff where DEI becomes liability.

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +3 / -1

shocked pikachu

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

Krassensteins are bottom feeders. They know what they're posting is nonsense. They do it for their business.

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't believe he's still on about this. I think we really got to him with the Clott Adams thing.

What's ridiculous is that he's clinging to this idea that it could not have been known rationally. If he spent half the energy researching vaccines, immunity, and biology as he does protecting his image then he'd be able to see this.

There was good reason to listen to the "quack" doctors on Rumble. What they said made sense and fit with well proven facts and theories.

Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were recommended because of their known mechanisms and the known mechanisms of coronaviruses. Mrna was backed by nothing. Never before did we define or craft vaccines by targeting a specific protein. I understand how the approach could attempt to be justified, but it was not backed by good logic.

We struggle to make highly effective vaccines for viruses that mutate a little bit. Traditional vaccines give our body exposure to a broad set of signals yet they fail to provide lifetime immunity to adaptive viruses. How would it make sense at all that by exposing immune systems to one little protein from the virus we would see a better, lasting immune response to a highly adaptive virus? Wouldn't the virus require LESS mutation to respond? Wouldn't the virus be more likely to adapt around that particular mechanism if the immune response is tailored to it?

Are they making a better immune system or a "better" virus?

We're seeing it play out now and it was totally predictable from the start. Not all side effects could've been predicted. ADE is hit or miss practically impossible to predict as I've learned now.

2
DisbandTheCIA 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have to admit. The roads were incredible during the covid scare.

1
DisbandTheCIA 1 point ago +1 / -0

His name isn't on that article

view more: Next ›