2
DissemblingBug 2 points ago +2 / -0

Totally agree, but we need to stay focused on the larger prize to be won November 3rd.

16
DissemblingBug 16 points ago +17 / -1

Totally agree, but the depressing part is that they won’t destroy themselves. Many will abandon their shytt hole cities/states and infect new cities/states with their ideologies/religion. Nothing is closer to Syrian/Somali refugees than American Leftists. Americans just have slightly more disposable income and their backward politics is their martyr-worthy religion. It’s sad but true.

We have a cultural (and maybe propaganda) problem more than a political one.

6
DissemblingBug 6 points ago +6 / -0

lol amazing

3
DissemblingBug 3 points ago +3 / -0

Came here to say this. In the coming months I’ll purchase my first gun. I’ll never be a member of the NRA, but I’d join GOA without hesitation.

-1
DissemblingBug -1 points ago +3 / -4

likewise — this is some type of post-hoc straw man. there are obvious differences between consenting adults and children. those of us who support individual liberty (and there are a lot of us here) have nothing to apologize for as it relates to gay marriage. plus we got Ric Grenell which makes it a fair trade 🤗

3
DissemblingBug 3 points ago +3 / -0

all good, MountainMan. be patient and stay curious. ask her a lot of questions about why she feels the way that she does.

9
DissemblingBug 9 points ago +20 / -11

...and that’s how you know it’s fake. this is Q-level LARP. I feel for “our guys” coz we don’t have the benefit of trusting the government (obvi; so sad!) but it leaves the dumbest of us susceptible to charlatans 🤷🏽

2
DissemblingBug 2 points ago +2 / -0

this legit reads like fan fiction lol

1
DissemblingBug 1 point ago +1 / -0

lol you’rea good husband to your darling wife. she sounds cute as a button, moving between Points A and B lol

4
DissemblingBug 4 points ago +4 / -0

guaranteed that is being reported as "hate speech."

12
DissemblingBug 12 points ago +12 / -0

My preference is that people call the purported liberals "leftists" going forward. many so-called Trump supporters have viewed themselves as "liberal" or "libertarian" in the past (certainly so on social issues), and there is nothing "liberal" about leftist policies.

6
DissemblingBug 6 points ago +6 / -0

Image looks doctored. out out out!!

1
DissemblingBug 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree. Perfect argument and precisely the approach to take. You don’t make people’s arguments disappear by silencing / cancelling them. You combat them with better arguments. Good job.

(Certainly I appreciate why some want equal “injustice” for the Left, but I don’t think it’s intellectually consistent to criticize Cancel Culture when it’s used against us while demanding it as justice for those with whom we disagree.)

-2
DissemblingBug -2 points ago +2 / -4

riiight, I think that I understand, but Woj was suspended right? a private company made a decision to suspend one of its employees, so why are people in this thread mad that he’s not been fired? that’s cancel culture imo, which was my point.

-11
DissemblingBug -11 points ago +1 / -12

I agree with this guy. It’s okay to y’all elected officials (or anyone for that matter, but especially elected officials) to pound sand. He’s that shytt network’s best NBA reporter, so he won’t get fired.

We love freedom, folks, n we loathe cancel culture! Be consistent!!

1
DissemblingBug 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t that this particular issue has been heard by SCOTUS and this isn’t my area of practice, but like a search during a Terry Stop (based on reasonable suspicion; lower standard than probable cause, which these officers had), this “hold” may very well be considered Constitutional provided it is reasonably necessary to ensure the safety of the arresting officers and passers-by. However, imo, maintaining that hold after the officers’ have secured the scene and to such an extent that it results in the suspect’s death (thereby depriving him of all current and future Constitutional rights) should likely be seen as an unconstitutional use of force, assuming the court ever hears the case.

In all likelihood, the Court would address this question circuitously through dictum in a case relating to state laws outlawing choke holds or repealing certain officer-related immunity provisions. Perhaps someone who practices Constitutional Law can further educate both of us, but in the meantime I’ll be arguing for the protection/expansion of our Constitutional rights, even when it’s not convenient to do so.

1
DissemblingBug 1 point ago +1 / -0

No it doesn’t, you’re right, but I doubt you’ve studied enough Constitutional law to make anything other than a strawman argument, so it’s whatever. Although this type of restraint is almost certainly Constitutional, holding it longer than is reasonably necessary for the safety of officers or nearby individuals almost certainly is not. And it shouldn’t take the SCOTUS to explain that to an officer of the executive branch. I’m out on that treatment of our citizens.

16
DissemblingBug 16 points ago +17 / -1

still at a freaking minimum this entire episode is producing unnecessary and unwarranted flak for officers. he’s surrounded by cops. roll the suspect on his side so he can calm the fk down n die of a drug overdose.

I know, I know, y’all gonna call me a shill n queer, but I’m pretty consistent in my policy positions. he’s a US citizen who’s presumed innocent until proven guilty. I still believe that matters. police can infringe upon citizens’ Constitutional rights when they’re in reasonable fear of their life or the lives of others immediately present. once an American citizen suspect is surrounded by armed police and cuffed, kindly get the fk off of said American citizen’s neck n wait for the ambulance. Thank you. -Thomas Jefferson probably

This death absolutely should not justify the looting, rioting, n murders that followed, but I will absolutely not defend the infringement of GF’s Constitutional rights by a government official. ban me if you want. I’m on the side of individual rights. full stop.

5
DissemblingBug 5 points ago +5 / -0

That dude is 6’4” and only weighs 160? lol he’s gotta get off the soy protein.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›