July 4th was the signing of the declaration of independence. July 6th was the first news published of it happening.
https://www.constitutionfacts.com/us-declaration-of-independence/dates-to-remember/
Nope fuck that. I was 16 when that shit went down. Young, but I remember the USA before fear and hate took over. Before we gave away our rights for "safety".
Fuck Islam, terrorist, and anyone who supports them.
Haven't forgot anything.
Every death that day was tragic (except the terrorist deaths), but this one should be burned into every citizen's brain https://youtu.be/UI9iQckRj7o
"Oh God Oh!" The last words of a terrified man who's only crime was showing up for work.
Mostly peaceful suicide planes.
Not the commenter you replied too.
It's near impossible to get a conceal carry in liberal states. I'll use CA as example because that's the laws I know best. CA is a may issue state. To get a CCW you have to submit a $50 request to your city Sheriff. Your request must have a "valid" reason to carry, and list up to 3 serial numbers for pistols you own. Wait 6 months to forever for an interview. If your interview goes well and your valid reason is accepted then you must pay for a CCW course to the tune of $600. Once you complete that the sheriff will process your request and eventually you can conceal carry the weapons you listed ( and only those weapons). If you are carrying outside of the confines of your valid reason it may be deemed illegal. You may not carry within X amount of feet of a school (depends on city), and you cannot carry on any private property that you do not have permission to carry on. Nor can you carry at any "gun free zones" which is most public areas in the state. If you live in the red areas there is a good chance of approval, but you still need to pay for the training courses. If you live in any blue areas like LA or San Fran you can make a generous donation ($10k+) to your representatives reelection campaign or you don't have a chance.
Tl:dr= after waiting forever you might get approved to carry on public sidewalks not near schools. And even then you're probably screwed if you ever need to use it.
So let's say you are at a mall in CA. Even with a CCW you would still be carrying illegally at the mall because you don't have the owners permission to carry and the mall probably has "gun free zone" signs. Your options are either to be without a gun or illegally carry. And that's if you paid the $650 to be legal.
Now you may be saying well CA is an anomaly of liberal states. But the reality is that NY, NJ, and HI are just as bad and in some cases worse.
Basically with all the hoops CA has for CCW carrying illegally is the same as carrying legally. The chance of you being within the confines of your CCW permit are near 0 and you have to depend on a jury to decide if your self defense argument is good enough. Might as well save the $650.
Edit: Your CCW is only good for 5 years and there is no guarantee of renewal.
Burden of proof is on you. It's telling that you won't answer thr question. Probably because there is no justification for the courts withholding information about the legal system to jurors.
It's also obvious you're a leftist. Your account has posts supporting big govt, abortion, and even Mussolini. What a joke.
This is all irrelevant anyway and you are intentionally, deliberately ignoring the overall broader point:
Then why did you bring up OJ and accuse me of ignoring your point? Makes no sense if it's irrelevant. You brought it up, you're deliberately ignoring the broader point.
Jury nullification is intentional introduction of personal bias into the justice system.
So you claim, but haven't proven.
"Juries should be instructed that they are allowed to use personal bias in making determinations of guilt with no regard for evidence!", the stupid faggot simp said while complaining that DAs were letting antifa rioters go free without charge, even when they later murder people.
What? I haven't said this. Are you still deflecting?
"Juries should be instructed that they are allowed to use personal bias in making determinations of guilt with no regard for evidence!", the stupid faggot simp cried while whining about liberal supreme court justices upholding every ridiculous gun law simply because they don't personally like guns.
Again I haven't said this so not sure wtf you're talking about.
You have literally not made one single actual argument in favor of why biased jurors are a good thing. Not fucking once.
I'm not arguing for biased jurors.
My original argument is that the court system surpressing information about jury nullification is a bad thing. My case for this is that withholding information about any part of the legal process is a disservice to the public.
I asked you why you believe withholding information to the public is a good thing? You still haven't answered that question.
Then how come there wasn't a hung jury as you claim?
The only evidence tying OJ to the murder was thrown out. Everything else was circumstantial. The prosecution literally presented nothing proving OJ was guilty. If that is your best example of the why Jury nullification is bad then you don't have a good reason.
Actually you replied that to someone else which is why I didn't comment on it. But since you now bring it up...
OJ was not aquitted due to jury nullification. The prosecution assumed a "slam dunk" case which is a huge no no. OJ's legal team made a great argument for defense. The smoking gun evidence was provided by Mark Fuhrman. Mark Furhman was caught in a lie and it was proved the evidence was tampered with. The only actual hard evidence had to be thrown out. The jury was in complete seclusion (as they should) and did not have the information the public had. It is well known and documented that the prosecution made several key mistakes which allowed OJ to walk. There was no jury nullification. You're just making shit up.
You've done nothing but make analogy to near impossible circumstances, attack me instead of my argument, and attack arguments I didn't make.
Rejecting your straw man isn't ignoring your argument. It's telling you that you haven't made a coherent argument.
Telling me to kill myself and that I'm somehow a liberal because I'm pro information isn't an argument. It's just you being shitty.
You call me a liberal but your argument is the exact tactics that liberals use. Deflect, insult, accuse your opponent of doing what you are doing. Enjoy 4 more years of Trump you cuck.
I'll assume you have no defense of your position since you've been given ample chance and refuse to give any examples of why withholding of information is a good thing.
Again your analogy is wrong.
Judge dread was judge, jury and executioner.
No obviously you can't just kill someone and then justify it later. However: nothing I said suggest that argument.
The jury gets to decide. Can you defend a reason to keep information from the jury?
Sounds like you want to abolish the police.
Seems like you want to attack an argument I didn't make instead of defending your position.
Is there a downside?
No the job of the jury is to decide if the defendant is guilty or not guilty of a crime. As a juror I can decide if someone is guilty or not regardless of the prosecution. Context matters. If I believed an accused murderer killed his daughters rapist I would not vote guilty even with a video showing the murder.
Your analogy of murder talk in a gun store is just wrong. Jury nullification isn't a crime while murder is. It's not illegal to talk about a fact of the justice system.
An all white/black/whatever race jury for a trial is wrong, but that has more to do with court corruption than jury nullification. We already have systems in place for that. The prosecution and defense gets to select jurors to prevent this scenario.
I reject any belief that it's a good thing to keep the jury and the public ignorant of the legal system.
Booby traps are illegal, but maybe OP has a rat problem and has a few armed traps in the yard.
EA buys popular game franchises and then produces low effort shit sequels to an established fanbase. Everything they touch turns to shit. Like some sort of Anti-Midas.
10 yard penalty if your player's knee touches him
You can't excuse the pedo priest by saying teachers do it too. That just means we need to overhaul the schools as well as the church leadership.
I'll believe the Catholic church is doing something about it when they actually take action. Scandal after scandal continues.
Nowadays, if a priest gets credibly accused, the diocese will not only turn him over to the cops as soon as they are notified of it, but will not support him in any way (legally or otherwise) unless he's cleared or acquitted.
This statement is only true as of 2019! And it doesn't address the continued coverups that happen. Yeah the church forsakes you if you get caught, but they also help to not let their priest get caught.
He killed a pedo. Should have got 6 months of paid vacation.
Great comment. Every citizen should know about Jury Nullification, but our legal system purposefully suppresses the info .
Ehh, close enough. No tears over dead commie pedos.
You're ignoring the fact that the Catholic Church pays to relocate pedo priest and spends tons of money (catholic tithes) to protect pedo priest. It's not just that catholicism has a problem with pedos. The highest levels of the church are making it a safe space for pedos to abuse children. Every dollar tithed supports this degeneracy. It's not the belief system that's the problem. It's the organization and leadership supporting abuse of children.
Downvote all you want. Pedophilia has no place in the world. Catholics could make a statement by condemning these actions and stopping tithes until it's fixed. Silence in the face of evil while funding it with your money is unforgivable.
Democracy is 2 wolves and a sheep deciding on dinner. That's why we are a republic and have a bill or rights.
And California doesn't have tsunami or hurricane issues like Japan because most storms move east to west. Also modern nuclear plants have so many fail-safes that you have near 0 chance of a meltdown. Also Thorium can be used for nuclear energy and can't meltdown at all. But fuck it it's scary to ignorant people so let's just leave millions of people in the desert without power.
It was. Those boobies were just outside Camp Pendleton and was a loved landmark. Now we have power issues because liberals don't understand that power doesn't just come from magic. NIMBY has turned into rolling blackouts like a 3rd world shit hole.
Remember when the news reported WTC7 collapse before it actually happened. Pepe farms remembers.
https://youtu.be/LEsjv9vKCGc