10
Doc_Liberty 10 points ago +10 / -0

Yep. Don't get me wrong, I'd love it if we found a massive smoking gun, but this feels much more tangible to me. We just need to get enough statistical evidence for the courts to allow more time...

7
Doc_Liberty 7 points ago +7 / -0

Yep, he has done a lot. Apparently the lawyers are taking on the phone bank part though

1
Doc_Liberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

You're right, I'm sure it is. Just seems like the Trump team is relying heavily on witnesses and affidavits... I prefer statistics but anything helps

2
Doc_Liberty 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm very interested in reading the white paper... this is what we need. Cold, hard numbers and capable people presenting it to the public (and the courts very soon)

12
Doc_Liberty 12 points ago +12 / -0

From his Twitter:

"Executive Director of Look Ahead America. Former Data Chief and Strategist for Trump for President"

13
Doc_Liberty 13 points ago +14 / -1

Right, we literally crowdfunded this guy so he could buy the offical ballot data and the DOJ is nowhere to be found

4
Doc_Liberty 4 points ago +4 / -0

So I think the 1400 number is just from the limited sample size he was able to analyze, with the goal of basically showing that there needs to be more investigating... with such limited time and resources, it's understandable to me

3
Doc_Liberty 3 points ago +3 / -0

I know man I totally get where you're coming from... I feel like we are in crazytown right now but everything is crazy so who knows

4
Doc_Liberty 4 points ago +4 / -0

So, uh, what are we gonna make of this gents?

18
Doc_Liberty 18 points ago +18 / -0

No doubt. I can't imagine what it would be like to try and synthesize all this evidence that is coming in from so many places and get it ready to present in a court.

I don't think everyone understands how important this is to get right. I know nothing about Dominion but I hope Sidney can deliver.

Jenna was right when she said this is moving at lightspeed compared to most court proceedings.

164
Doc_Liberty 164 points ago +165 / -1

That would be incredible.

Matt is doing the needed, heavy statistical lift that proving faud will take. I wish this was the Trump team's strategy from the start, it's too easy to dismiss witnesses for these activist judges. Not that they are unimportant, but I like when numbers are the backbone of a case myself.

EDIT:

He's going to get all these ballots tossed out! GA law does NOT allow using PO box addresses to request absentee ballots.

https://twitter.com/MattBraynard/status/1331323676474617857?s=20

90
Doc_Liberty 90 points ago +91 / -1

Not sure about anyone else, but I've thought from the begining it was going to have to be this kind of stuff that really gets the courts to take a hard look at whats going on in the states. Time to start peeling back the layers of the onion now.

By the way, 1400 voters doesn't sound like much, but from what I understand, that is just from his sample, not the entire voting population.

1
Doc_Liberty 1 point ago +1 / -0

It definitely is not, you are right. I would be shocked if SCOTUS doesn't have a role to play though, at least in a state or two.

3
Doc_Liberty 3 points ago +3 / -0

We need leadership on our side right now. I'm not talking about from Trump, or anyone really higher up even... Someone mentioned in the comments it could be a simple as mods sticking a "where we stand" in each state's battles to help keep this line straight. The posters on this board are really incredible and very high energy, but we need to put that energy to use in a productive direction!

I'm holding on, but the line is starting to stretch thin and we need everyone pulling in the same direction.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›