1
Doggos 1 point ago +1 / -0

No. Gab started out by advertising themselves on /r/The_Donald, so The Donald was one of the first groups there.

When we were forced to leave Reddit, Gab wanted to take us in.

The group has nothing to do with this site though.

by Gumnut
1
Doggos [M] 1 point ago +1 / -0

Is this issue new? I am aware that in some circumstances the embeds have always doubled or rarely tripled.

There were some recent changes to how we handle Twitter embeds (particularly, to prevent pre-loading). If you have seen an increase in duplicated Twitter embeds in the last 48-72 hrs then we can look at fixing that.

10
Doggos [M] 10 points ago +10 / -0

I hope this is still a MAGA community not a principled free speech to the death community. Original TD was certainly not shy about banning bad faith users.

Yes. My stance is that we should absolutely ban them from here, but we should not try to silence them in their own spaces.

This (Patriots.win) is clearly not a free speech site, it is a site with a topic.

3
Doggos [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. Ideally it'd be q3/q4 but it probably won't be.

7
Doggos [M] 7 points ago +7 / -0

They are completely different.

"continue reading thread" is for comments that are too many levels deep.

"view more comments" is to show more sibling comments. previously, if ten people replied directly to your comment, you would only be able to see 5 of them in the thread. now you can load the other 5

4
Doggos [M] 4 points ago +4 / -0

I understand. I want to fix this, this year.

6
Doggos 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's not true, sometimes we don't communicate for hours at a time

3
Doggos [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

For links, the “get suggested title” has been broken forever — just delete it and support instead …

True

7
Doggos [M] 7 points ago +7 / -0

I don't think there's any way to prove that

4
Doggos 4 points ago +4 / -0

dunno just copied it from google

5
Doggos [M] 5 points ago +6 / -1

There's enough Twitter clones

2
Doggos [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Because the link is blocked for spamming

3
Doggos [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think it's undeniable that we have a historical unwillingness to accept financial contributions or to show ads. Not sure why you're arguing this point.

That's an unreleased feature (in beta) and there's no plans to advertise it on Patriots.win.

12
Doggos [M] 12 points ago +14 / -2

It's a hard topic to discuss so I don't want to say much, although I think I did make another comment on this topic in this thread.

We will always be a forum which aims to help get Trump re-elected, but we also need to position ourselves more as a MAGA forum than a Trump forum.

6
Doggos [M] 6 points ago +7 / -1

I don't see it happening. I do definitely think that we need to do a better job at moderating bad downvotes. If we were doing a good job, then nobody would likely be asking for downvote transparency.

3
Doggos [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

We would mainly need to accept fiat because most people don't do crypto, and there's not really any support for recurring crypto contributions, but yeah, we'd definitely accept crypto & XMR specifically.

4
Doggos [M] 4 points ago +4 / -0

We would show ads and allow them to be hidden for a couple dollars per month.

We don't have any plans for that right now (but as some may point out, that feature does exist on other sites in this network)

In any case, we would try to serve less or no ads for logged in users, and serve the ads to guests (which is a lot of traffic).

3
Doggos [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

I am just replying to this so that I didn't ignore it. I don't have much to say in response, I am taking it as feedback more than a question. I agree with it.

3
Doggos [M] 3 points ago +3 / -0

We have an archiving integration coming along at some point.

Good ideas.

5
Doggos [M] 5 points ago +5 / -0

If moderators removed them, we still have them. If you deleted your account or you deleted the posts, we don't have them.

4
Doggos [M] 4 points ago +4 / -0

Our mobile site is a PWA, so it's partially installed on your device. You will see the same on Truth and some other sites.

It's not ideal to show that "an update is available" banner, I agree. We should change it to deploy the update to your device without showing you the banner and making you interact with it.

2
Doggos [M] 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting. That's a new account, handshakes get banned quickly (which isn't necessarily ideal).

view more: Next ›