Election interference. ISPs ordered to block it. Within 1 month all stock value is lost and Jackoff comes crawling to Trump in tears.
And in honor of Trump I will officially lose my last Liberal friends when they complain by telling them they are fucking retards.
Well let's see the lawsuits then. Tweets and rallies don't overturn elections. If we don't have lawsuits in all 7 close swing states by the end of this week, it doesn't look good to me. I say this as someone with no legal experience, not American and totally know that they are working on it as fast as they can.
We need actual suits filed so so fast though.
Brother I was just looking for where I could fit that same observation in to this thread. 1984 almost makes sense compared to the fucking shit we are dealing with. The funny thing is in China, they would have long since blocked Twitter. If Trump found a way to order ISPs to block Twitter based on election interference, it would basically ruin all of Twitter's value. They would come crawling back on their hands and knees. I really don't see why it would be hard to do (especially in this 2nd term).
I've been looking for this data (non-American). Wow. That is fucked big time. So if 10,000 dead people voted, there is no way to know who they voted for? The idea that is all part of Trump's plan doesn't look so good. I still think he will win but we are dancing with the devil big time having let it get this far. Arrests should have been made prior to the election. Fuck.
"Thomas' supporters questioned Hill's credibility, claiming she was delusional or had been spurned, leading her to seek revenge.[13] They cited the time delay of ten years between the alleged behavior by Thomas and Hill's accusations, and noted that Hill had followed Thomas to a second job and later had personal contacts with Thomas, including giving him a ride to an airport—behavior which they said would be inexplicable if Hill's allegations were true.[6][9][13][22] Hill countered that she had come forward because she felt an obligation to share information on the character and actions of a person who was being considered for the Supreme Court.[13] She testified that after leaving the EEOC, she had had two "inconsequential" phone conversations with Thomas, and had seen him personally on two occasions, once to get a job reference and the second time when he made a public appearance in Oklahoma where she was teaching."
A decade after the fact she alleged that he said inappropriate stuff to her at work.
So what if he did? Dems love to mix things like that and Trump's alpha boasting, in private, from long before he ran for office, with actual sexual assault allegations against people like Bill Clinton, Joe Biden, Hunter Biden etc.
World of difference.
And do you know this person? Has anyone else verified this at all?
We know Trump's team checks here (as well as others). We need to put effort into verifying these things so we don't overwhelm and waste people's time.
Once he wins and gets back to business, I think he needs to launch investigations into nearly all states. And there is nothing more important this term than fixing the voting system. I'm at the point where if someone is against Voter ID, I assume they are a traitor and need to be handled accordingly.
Dude that sounds like hardware talk. Code to increment a number does not glitch. Not at this scale. Maybe if you are adding the number of atoms in the universe some memory issue could need to be accounted for. Not counting a few million votes.
Holy fuck.