I mean he didn’t say boycott the runoffs. He said demand that they support a special session in exchange for your vote. His point is that if there was fraud in November and nothing changes why would January be different, and if those two aren’t calling for change they might as well be a part of the corruption. I understand the sentiment. That being said, I’d still vote regardless if it’s all the same.
Serous question - Are Dan Scavino, Sydney Powell, and Flynn Q larping? They have essentially shown their support of Q in different ways. Scavino has tweeted out Q memes and looked like he was responding to people on Q boards. I have no idea whether it’s all bs or not, seems wise to be skeptical of everything, but what’s the explanation for their repeated nods to Q?
I believe they are misrepresenting the numbers. They claim .15 were rejected for signatures and the 3% number was rejections in general for any reason. By excluding other types of rejection (incorrect personal info, unfilled lines, incorrect procedure and so on) they are not giving you the complete story.
What we need to know is how many mail in ballots were rejected overall in 2020.
Perkins fucking Coie. This should tell you everything you need to know.