2
DragonEnergyDick 2 points ago +2 / -0

These people never learn do they.

3
DragonEnergyDick 3 points ago +3 / -0

I did not inhale.

Bill Clinton is a rapist infowars.com

8
DragonEnergyDick 8 points ago +8 / -0

The subconscious knows, that’s why they throw the symbolism in our faces. To soothe the subconscious.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=j0KzUS0b_uc

6
DragonEnergyDick 6 points ago +6 / -0

Thank you corporate overlords for supporting our cause!

Also big businesses are evil and we need to tax and regulate them more heavily because they’re so corrupt!

72
DragonEnergyDick 72 points ago +72 / -0

Imagine voting for Joe Biden.

If they’re an actual hippy liberal, then they should hate this, but too many don’t. Because they have no principles, fucking sell outs. They are cucked to the DNC.

1
DragonEnergyDick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let’s go full Sputnik.

1
DragonEnergyDick 1 point ago +1 / -0

Women’s bodies adapt better to space and have less side effects than men. That’s why they’re choosing to use more female astronauts.

So probably not a diversity hire. She’s not a gay black trans octopus-hybrid.

6
DragonEnergyDick 6 points ago +6 / -0

That was on the list of subs that got banned. They were one of the bigger ones on the list.

8
DragonEnergyDick 8 points ago +8 / -0

I like how that gorilla hit the other gorilla

5
DragonEnergyDick 5 points ago +5 / -0

Gullible normies, leftists, low-info voters...

I know someone voting for Joe. He says Trump is a pedo too so it doesn’t matter. Wtf.

2
DragonEnergyDick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this their October Surprise? Lol.

How pathetic.

by Krunchi
2
DragonEnergyDick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Potassium Pepe 🐸 🍌

161
DragonEnergyDick 161 points ago +165 / -4

Aren’t they linked to human trafficking too? Worst candidate ever in our history.

3
DragonEnergyDick 3 points ago +3 / -0

All Trump had to do was say mail in voting is bad and the libs all decided to encourage it.

by Xnyr21
1
DragonEnergyDick 1 point ago +1 / -0

This sort of thing is desperate. Says a lot.

4
DragonEnergyDick 4 points ago +4 / -0

Both Kamala and Cory are highly unlikeable.

It’s obvious that Biden is their Trojan horse.

2
DragonEnergyDick 2 points ago +2 / -0

Tim Pool and Jimmy Dore are prime examples of why liberals who stick to their principles dislike the DNC.

4
DragonEnergyDick 4 points ago +4 / -0

Lude said he did things to Chinese kids. We will have to wait to see if that’s true.

1
DragonEnergyDick 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’d like to clarify I’m not a libertarian. I just want a limited government.

There were very few laws in place back then to protect the environment. Environmental charities were unpopular too. Now that’s no longer the case.

Also, if a company pollutes, the government can prosecute. Simple. We have laws for that now. That’s not necessarily dependent on the EPA.

Both the EPA and 230 prevent suing companies, even when they have caused obvious harm. Read the Mises link. That’s why I made the comparison.

It’s not like the government is an innocent angel either, they’re not saviors fighting on behalf of the “little guy”, they have their own interests. The EPA has done harm of its own. That’s what government agencies do when they get too much power, which is why I support reducing their budgets.

The public utility idea is interesting. The party is full of RINOs and these bills magically disappear.

I think we agree on more than you think.

1
DragonEnergyDick 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s now illegal to pollute. You don’t need the EPA to make those laws. They’re mostly unnecessary these days. Someone pollutes and causes harm, sue. When government agencies have nothing better to do, they overreach. I’m not saying remove them completely, but their budget should be reduced significantly.

https://mises.org/library/libertarian-manifesto-pollution

https://www.google.com/amp/s/reason.com/2017/03/21/relax-gutting-the-epa-wont-make-your-air/%3famp

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/john-stossel-its-time-to-stick-a-fork-in-the-epa

https://reason.com/tag/environmental-protection-agenc/

I’m for reform of section 230, not abolishment.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›