I did yesterday, but took it further with a check/raise...
"feeling cute, might start a political party...idk https://thedonald.win/p/11RhAx1226/feeling-cute-might-start-a-polit/c/
of course she did, seats on house committees don't just happen
Anyone have a verified physical location of the machines? Better to ask forgiveness than permission to forensically image the drives?
Took me the whole hour since the post but I did what you asked. Wasn't easy tugging one out on her head but if this is how I guarantee liberty, I'll do my part.
"Vini, Vidi, Vini" I guess.
I'm disgusted in myself and likely be impotent due to the flashbacks by this swamp thing.
However, shame is temporary, but MAGA is forever.
This is the way...
friendly neighborhood cybersecurity expert here...incorrect...there is always a digital footprint of a compromise.
Portable malware may itself not be present but there is a trail of data manipulation, timestamps, logs (even cleared ones) that all tell a story of the attack vector and indicators of compromise.
True forensic analysis of the disk will uncover the pattern in these data captures which can be matched to other voting machines and even to known threat actors like country state hacker groups.
Even a formatted or reloaded system may maintain ghost data within disk sectors. To get rid of data, entirety, they would need to wipe a disk with multiple low level passes, writing all zeros or all ones, to ensure a purge. If encrypted, shredding the private key would suffice.
We are dealing with a clown show at the state IT level. We know the drives aren't encrypted and I doubt they will take the time to purge data for hundreds of systems. They likely just boot to an image and does a quick format (overwrite the beginning of a drive) before it reloads. Data can still be recovered, albeit more difficult, but forensically available to some degree.
"sic semper tyrannis" seems overly appropriate here.
VA state motto, ironically.
"sic semper tyrannis" seems overly appropriate here.
VA state motto, ironically.
I bet you got a purdy mouth
This is the way.
If McSally's vote total, adjusted based on real vs fraudulent votes, results in a win; then yes. A concession is ceremonial in nature and is not legally binding. The concession can be pulled back at any time prior to Nov 30 when the AZ SOS certifies the results. However, I would imagine that if fraud were involved and proven beyond a reasonable doubt, that certification could be overturned by SCOAZ and if appealed, SCOTUS.
I can already hear the BRRRRAAAAAAAAAATTT of a 30mm Avenger over the liberal tears.
I think the OP was careless in explaining his interpretation, which is; coincidence does not determine causality.
This document is not meant or intended to be a silver bullet. What this affadavit provides is character and standing as credible attestation of an expert cybersecurity professional.
"here are my credentials, here is what I have witnessed (vulnerable systems), and here is how it applied to the election in Michigan with irrefutable data points"
It is a quality story that tells a narrative of potential fraud (which we all know to be true) that bolsters the case for fraud.
March forward pedes, it's drop in the bucket of a monumental amount of evidence that will push MAGA to the winner's circle.
Laptop Discovered = Q4 2019 Enhancement Act = Q1 2020
This is Trump playing 4D chess again. Little moves.
Strategy, m'fuckas
Never Forget what this man did at Nakatomi Plaza: Went against the establishment to defeat terrorism because he knew it was right and just.
you spelled "crossdresser" wrong.
🤣