Prediction: Trump does EXACTLY what Parler did . . . and gets the financial backing of billionaire oligarch "dual citizens". They will "rein in all unacceptable debate [to a certain country in the middle east] and de-platform all conservatives who display the disturbing penchant for belief in America-First, controlled borders, or a small-minded resistance to treason."
It will undoubtedly also be headed up by Trump's dual citizen son-in-law Jarred Kushner.
My wife and I have retreated from modern woke propaganda entertainment and gone back to TV from the 1980s. We were watching the gameshow "Super Password," with Bert Convey (circa 1980) and every black person on it was middle class, clean-cut and thorough-goingly normal. I was pleased at how civilized and assimilated they were. These were the archetypes being promoted to the general public. We then watched "The Love Boat" from 1978, and exactly the same thing: African-Americans were portrayed with dignity and respect. They were all written as normal 3-dimensional characters. Had you switched out a black actor for a white actor, the character would have been more or less the same. They were treated as equals. Blacks weren't "cut-outs" for disgruntled Jewish writers, denouncing America, capitalism and the flag. They also weren't portrayed as Klan-caricatures of lusting after white women and calling everyone "Pimp".
It was shocking, watching the difference of how they were portrayed when I was growing up, versus how they're portrayed now.
It really makes me realize how, when the country was run by Saxon Christians, the prospect of a bi-racial nation seemed possible. After the Saxons were deposed and a new . . . let's just say "dual citizen elite" took over . . . blacks were weaponized. Taught to split themselves off from the rest of America, spit on the flag, and lust after white women. They ditched the dignified Bill Cosby "middle class" black archetype and replaced it with a vile gangsta-rap ghetto rat role model. Blacks weren't shown with families or going to church, but smoking weed and twerking. On MTV, we can trace this moment exactly, when Sumner Redstone sent down a memo to ditch rock and roll and to promote r&b and gangsta rap. This shit came straight from the top. And hint: It didn't come from black people.
I just did a video on how they seek to control us through fear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RBv4HAnLVUQ
I have a great idea! Let's have billionaires and globalists from the Council on Foreign Relations larp as conservatives, agitating for a Convention of States. And let's have a pre-written Constitution in the wings, written in the 1970s (by Warren Berger and others) granting the oligarchical class unchallenged power and unassailable control over our country.
If anyone wants to read about this scam in greater depth, see "Shadows of Power" by James Perloff. He goes over the "Convention of States" scam in this book from way back in 1987. Here's an audiobook version here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UyGfqZv-hMg&t=17270s Fast-forward to around the 4 hour: 47 minute mark.
- Hint: If Ben Shapiro is for a Convention of States, you know it's a globalist set-up.
It's not about a "green screen". It's about a composite image. They added in two layers of CGI. Layer 1 = Biden walking to the place. Layer 2 = fake microphones to make it look like he was talking to a crowd of journalists, when in fact he was merely talking to his handlers. Or perhaps he wasn't even talking at all, given his convenient mask and the state of voice-masking filters that are now available.
This is how you know mask mandates will NEVER be repealed during this regime. If the masks are removed, you'll be able to see that 9/10ths of all Biden comments are spoken by an aide in a van with a voice-filter on.
He didn't pardon Kyle Rittenhouse. But he pardoned every human trafficking rap star that Kim Kardashian gave him and every Israeli spy that Jarred Kushner lobbied for.
All the people who went to bat for Trump?
He left them out to dry.
George Washington chose full unibomber.
China's writing the script.
That's the most racist thing I've ever seen! A "diversity officer" encouraging non whites to place themselves in harm's way.
Sounds like modern-day slavery to me.
Someone alert the Left to the work of this bigot, who's trying to imperil Africans and Illegal Aliens.
I, for my part, am glad that the U.S. Army has finally seen the light that, instead of defending the flag, they have weaponized hordes who take a knee and step on it. Sounds like a recipe for success.
Gender IS biological sex. (It's not a "social construct".) English has a parallel vocabulary since the French-speaking Normans invaded and imposed their rule over German-speaking Saxons. So we have parallel vocabularies (one set of words from Latin, one from German). Hence why we have "kingly" and "regal," "raise" and "rear," "height" and "altitude". Gender and sex co-existed for the same reason, and were synonyms.
I speak Italian. On Italian forms, when they ask for your sex, they request you to fill in your "genere," your gender. It comes from the root word that also gives us "generate" [as if to generate a child] and "genitals".
"Gender" is just about the worst word to try and de-peg from biology, because it's a direct reference to it. Gender is no more a "social construct" than your genitals are. (Hint: Same word.)
Wow! The damage she unintentionally did to her internal organs. Poor thing! Hopefully, she can recover now that she's stop taking that unnatural poison.
I love Sidney Powell. But, by this point, she should know that the corruption is so deep (and the bribes so lucrative) that there's no way to get justice through the courts. All these secretaries or state and local judges and officials have secret Bitcoin accounts with $30 million a pop. There's no way they're going to "do the right thing". That country is gone.
The Democrats openly want to dynamite the United States, and the Republicans (who used to stand as a last bulwark against the collapse) abandoned cultural conservatism and went over to neocon "Greed is Good" Yuppy crony-capitsist conservatism. Such people are eminently easy to bribe.
Their grandparents had lines beyond which they would not go (treason being one them). But the new breed of dual citizen, open borders, rainbow flag-waving Republicans took the bribe money. They were conditioned for decades by Fox News to shine their Israeli flag lapel-pins, to deny that an "American People" exists at all, and to praise money as the highest value.
In the end, it wasn't the Democrats who dealt the death blow to the republic; it was the Fox New GOP Establishment who betrayed us.
Corporate America abandoned Traditional Americans and are now aligned with Antifa. Just ask the Koch Brothers.
So Teddy Roosevelt was for altering US demographics by shutting off immigration from Europe and channeling Africans and Central Americans into the United States?
Show me.
By the way, even your usage of "white supremacy" as a term demonstrates that you're not mentally emancipated from the left. Loving your own people is not "white supremacy". It has a different historical word: Normal.
Until you stop using Bolshevik leftist terms [like "white supremacy," "racist" or any other bullshit], you're not sufficiently intellectually-liberated. They still have control of your mind.
They're making you think that historically-normal behaviors are "bad," and that radical, a-historical policies of suicide are "virtuous".
I'm extremely well-read in the period in question. No magazine article, novel or movie from 1918 showed average people wearing face masks. No President wore them. No singer wore them. No movie star.
I've read Jack London, Edith Wharton, Kathleen Norris, William Dean Howells. T.S. Eliot, F. Scott Fitzgerald, H.L. Mencken, Ring Lardner, Dorothy Parker, and so forth.
Not one mention.
The reality is: SOME people, within a two block radius of a hospital wore them for 20 minutes on one afternoon in New York's lower East Side. That's it.
It was not a wide custom. Nor was it mandated anywhere.
This was the time-period of Prohibition. THAT'S what it's remembered for. If you took a time machine back there and asked where all the masks were, the people would look at you like you were fucking crazy.
The upshot: You're being lied to about history. They're creating a fake precedent. There WAS NO GLOBAL SHUTDOWN in 1918. There was no widespread use of face masks. There was no shutdowns of churches, restaurants or concerts.
It's not abandoning your principles. It's embracing your culture. Everything prior to 2005 is considered "white supremacist". For instance, consider Abraham Lincoln's quote: "Our republican form of government is designed for a homogeneous people".
Would THAT be considered a "white supremacist" statement today?
You BET it would!
How about Teddy Rosevelt, saying, The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing to be a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities, an intricate knot of German-Americans, Irish-Americans, English-Americans, French-Americans, Scandinavian-Americans or Italian-Americans, each preserving its separate nationality, each at heart feeling more sympathy with Europeans of that nationality, than with the other citizens of the American Republic. The men who do not become Americans and nothing else are hyphenated Americans; and there ought to be no room for them in this country. The man who calls himself an American citizen and who yet shows by his actions that he is primarily the citizen of a foreign land, plays a thoroughly mischievous part in the life of our body politic. He has no place here; and the sooner he returns to the land to which he feels his real heart-allegiance, the better it will be for every good American. There is no such thing as a hyphenated American who is a good American. The only man who is a good American is the man who is an American and nothing else."
Would Teddy Roosevelt be considered a "white supremacist" by today's radical left? You BET he would!
No, you're dancing to the left's tune when you deny and distance yourself from the historical norms and convictions of your ancestors, and you start falling over yourself to say you're for degeneracy, and castrating children, and you love all races equally, and hate your own "whiteness".
You do that, and you're the Left's bitch.
Even using the term "racism" unironically shows just how much real estate they own in your mind.
I'll plunk your ass in a time machine and send you back to George Washington, and you can tell him all about how you're not a racist. He'd say, "What's a 'racist'?"
"It's someone who loves and protects his own people."
"Ah, you mean a patriot!"
"Er . . . uh . . . no. I believe in sabotaging my own people and working for the interests of other groups."
"Ah, we have a word for that, too," Washington would say. "The word WE use for that is 'traitor'. Now stay right here while I go get a rope. I'll be back for you in a second."
Ol' Sparky? Isn't that overkill? The woman's ALREADY dead. Deporting her BEFORE the murder would surely have been more humane. But electrocuting her corpse afterward?
Aristotle, in Politics, said that foreign aliens in a country illegally had to be asked to leave. (Their breaking the law with impunity eroded the rule of law for everyone.) If they didn't leave when asked, he said that they'd have to be . . . dealt with much like the African-American kid dealt with this woman. Go get me her birth certificate and immigration papers. Until you can show me she was LEGALLY in our country, then I'm not moved to pity. If you can't, then . . . well, she got what Aristotle called for.
The definition of "Conflicted": An "urban youth" taking out a Native American from Mexico in the country illegally.
Er . . . about that.
Um. See the little hats?
At the time, the Republican Party was not conservative. They called them "radical Republicans". They race-baited like modern Democrats. John Brown, the mentally ill white man who told blacks to rise up and kill Whitey, was a "Radical Republican". His son also said that he was a Communist.
Horace Greeley, the famous newspaper editor, was one of the founders of the Republican Party. He hliterally hired Karl Marx and had him writing for his newspaper for 11 years!
That early iteration of the Republican Party was shockingly similar to what we call Social Justice Warriors today.
After the Civil War, they wanted whites in the South to suffer. John F. Kennedy writes about this in "Profiles in Courage". The moderates wanted a general amnesty after the war, and to return to being brothers. While the "Radical Republicans" openly called for the South to "suffer". This was a reference to the police force collapsing after the war. All the old constables went into the war and were either killed or forbidden to return to the police force when they got back home. As a result of having no police, crime exploded. Black rage killings became an almost constant occurrence, where African-Americans would break into a house and murder an entire white family. (Black scholar W.E.B. DuBois openly writes about the explosion of black crime during the Reconstruction period.) When the people begged for the government to send help, the Radical Republicans said, "Blacks are killing you? Good! You deserve it!" Because of the abuses, the Ku Klux Klan rose up to act as a vigilante group to protect white families. (The KKK would never have happened but for the Radical Republicans PURPOSELY creating policies to "make the white population suffer.)
It's shocking when you go back and read about the time-period, how similar this early Republican Party was to the modern Democrats. Even to the extent of placing blacks in power as stalking horses and using them to flip elections. They barred whites from voting, disenfranchising them. (I learned this from Bernard Baruch's autobiography. We're never taught this stuff in school.) White males who participated in the Confederacy were barred from voting. This was 90% of the electorate. With whites out of the way, the Radical Republicans used illiterate ex-slaves as stalking horses to flip elections. Just very, VERY ugly stuff.
You're 100% right! A third party could never work. Which is why we still have the Whig party.
Wait! What?
The Republican Party WAS a third party?
But . . . but . . . YOU said that third parties don't work. (We're still Federalists and Whigs, right?)
Third parties never win, correct?
No! You're right: We should just maintain the corruption we have now and never change. Which is why I'm glad we never had an American Revolution, and resigned ourselves to working within the British Court system. It's 2021. Have the courts in London given us our freedom yet?
Don't believe their inflated polling methods. After seeing how they oversampled people in prisons in the 1950s Kinsey samples (to falsely inflate a 1% gay rate to a 10% gay rate), be very leery of CNN polls that use the same methodologies.
Remember what newsman Walter Cronkite said: "The media is not there to reflect public opinion, but to SHAPE it".
Likewise these polls aren't there to reflect real rates of gayness, but to stimulate it. To change attitudes about it. To encourage you to join their ranks.
In short, this is a psy-op to try and emasculate you. Don't fall for it.
This is the same CNN who oversampled Democrats by 14 points in their election polls. Trust them like you'd trust any other compulsive liar.
Ancient Israel never developed a republic. They didn't even have a word for one. (They had kitarchy: i.e., rule by judges, and later monarchy. After that, they settled into theocracy.)
With all due respect, to attribute our system of government to them is as anachronistic as trying to attribute Calculus to them, or the aqueduct.
Read the Bible in vain to find out about a system of government like ours. Read Cicero's "De Republica," by contrast, and you will see an exact blueprint.
By the way, just as our political ideas were shaped by him, our entire educational system was also based on Cicero's reforms. Of the 10 grades they had in school when the Founding Fathers attended class, 8 of them centered on the teaching of Cicero as the main curriculum. His influence on their thinking cannot be overestimated. See a lecture on Cicero here, to see what I'm talking about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rswj2AvC1Xk
America has a hybrid form of government, based on the template set forth by Cicero in "De Republica". Cicero agreed with Plato and Aristotle that there were 3 basic forms of government: Monarchy, aristocracy and republic. These three decayed and had corrupt forms: namely, tyranny, oligarchy and democracy. Cicero said that, to keep the best aspects of all three (and to mitigate their worst aspects) it might be good to create a hybrid form of government, composed of all three . . . with a President [representing monarchy], a senate [representing aristocracy] and a House of Representatives [representing republic].
The Founding Fathers in America followed this recipe.
Of the three branches, only the House of Representatives had people DIRECTLY voting for the politician. (The House of Representatives represented the common man.)The other two [senate and President] had a two-tier system, whereby the politicians were installed by wiser minds. In the senate the people voted for the state legislators and the state legislators installed the senator. Likewise, with the Presidency, where the people voted for the electors and the ELECTORS chose the President.
Senators and the President were supposed to be somewhat removed from the common man, due to the common man's lack of knowledge regarding political science. Senate and the Presidency were more aristocratic in nature, with the representatives removed somewhat from politics (like Supreme Court Justices who are not directly elected, to tamp down on political conflicts of interest).
So populism was very limited in our Constitutional system, with only the House of Representatives being given over to "the people". The other two branches mitigated the excesses of the House by having men of higher stature in those positions.
In fact [to go by what John Stuart Mill said in 1861] the House was just a tack-on to prevent revolution. It was an afterthought to give the poor SOME say . . . but not much.
The adults were supposed to be in the senate and White House, to counteract the wild extravagances of the common people [who would just try to vote themselves money from the Treasury through welfare schemes].
That's the difference between a democracy and a republic. In a democracy, whatever is popular is implemented. (Like how candy is always more popular than medicine.) In a republic, it's not what's popular that counts, but what's right.
A democracy exists by mob rule and cares nothing for individual rights. Only the collective matters. Whereas, in a republic, the mob counts for nothing, and the rights of the individual are protected.
All things considered, I prefer a republic to a democracy. Like Plato, Aristotle and Cicero, I consider a democracy the corrupt form of a republic. (Sadly, in America, we already degraded from a republic into a democracy. And we went bankrupt because of it. And that's why we're now living through a coup where an oligarchy is taking over. This always happens in the cycle. Plato said, "Democracy is the last stage before a dictatorship.) Take a look at the District of Columbia, with razor wire and barricades around it. This is a coup that happened because the wealthy were pissed off at the democracy that had previously run the nation's finances into the ground.
I leave you with a quote from Alexander Fraser-Tytler: "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse due to loose fiscal policy, which is always followed by a dictatorship".
As a Hispanic, white supremacists disturb me less than pro-Semites. The KKK isn't stealing our nuclear secrets and selling them to other countries. Just sayin'.