I think we would've won more black votes if Trump held any events at black churches or held rallies in black areas. But he didn't visit any black churches that I know of. Would've loved to see him visit Detroit, or a rural black county in Georgia even if just once. He didn't do that so far as I know. He focused his rallies mainly in blue collar majority white areas, which played to his strengths. Though I think with a few well placed events he could've gotten a few extra percent of the black vote. Maybe not enough to justify it.
The Platinum Plan was so over the top unrealistic that everyone knew it would never happen. I'm not sure how much was spent on ads targeting blacks or urban demographics, though Kim Klacic and Billy Prempeh mentioned that the RNC was hesitant to spend any money in cities.
Hispanics are a more promising voting block as you mentioned. Especially since Dems are throwing them under the bus.
"What I did not realize was all of the national conversation about states like Georgia, Pennsylvania, and Michigan, was seen as casting doubt on the validity of votes coming out of predominantly Black communities like Atlanta, Philadelphia, and Detroit," he wrote.
So apparently blacks are immune to having their fraud questioned, and apparently, only blacks commit voter fraud in the first place, so in his attempt to appear "not racist" he's actually just proving he's a racist.
Warnock got 92% of black votes in the GA senate race, black democrats are the most reliable voting block in the world (Putin and Lukashenko won around 80% of the votes in Russia and Belarus) so this pandering does nothing. Oklahomans, please primary this guy!
Everyone moved to the fewest number of counties in history! Makes total sense, even though the numbers since 2016 don't support it!
https://www.statista.com/statistics/269967/urbanization-in-the-united-states/
Biden and the Dems often thank minority voters for "delivering" the election to Biden, even though Biden got the lowest share of minority voters for a Democrat since Nixon. Makes you wonder who they're really talking about.
As to Biden that's pretty similar to how people view him (and Kamala) in the states. He was way less popular than Bernie Sanders or even some of the others, but was seemingly selected. Probably due to corruption or they thought that Sanders wouldn't win, but I have a funny feeling that the Dems would've nominated a ham sandwich if they had to. The election was 100% about Trump, nothing about Biden. He was no Obama and that makes the election results even more ridiculous to look at.
I looked up Tall Poppy Syndrome, as I had seen it before but wasn't familiar with it. Looks like it's mainly a political term in Australia/NZ so my understanding is limited, but from what I can tell, it has to do with thinking you're better than others. Though in my mind that doesn't quite relate to thinking for yourself, or to having a differing political opinion, but terms and concepts tend to get abused and applied where they don't belong.
Thanks for the update! As I understand the black pill term, it's usually people who are Trump supporters or patriots, but who believe that everything is hopeless. If Trump did have indisputable proof, he's either saving it until the last minute, or he doesn't believe that he could present it and it would be believed or shared in the media. I believe he has proof of wrongdoing by both the R's and D's, and proof of Chinese connections/corruption. A lot of the Biden laptop was that, and he has access to probably 10x that just by virtue of him being the president. I don't know what he'll do with it though, or how effective it would be even if he releases and declassified everything.
Mandela Effect.