1
DuelPorpoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, but I’m not part of your “downvote all my posts” conspiracy.

Your accumulation of downvotes isn't from a few malicious coordinated individuals. But from a plethora of independent users naturally responding to your loving personality whenever it taints their screen.

1
DuelPorpoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

we need to have adverts shown to commies as a deterrent, if you hate click here, you will literally feed the beast, same with lurkers too.

1
DuelPorpoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

probably because you've fallen for the Nostradamus effect, that is, if you fling enough shit, something will stick.

Make enough predictions and some will lap up your success, while ignoring ALL of your failures, which far outweigh your success.

1
DuelPorpoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do know, but it's clear you don't know anything about Musk as the reference clearly went over your head, keep peddling the half true conspiracies, maybe if you do it long enough it may become true enough.

0
DuelPorpoise 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, Elon’s going to be selling bridges on Mars one day, no conspiracy required. musk’s companies today are producing much more wealth, new technology and useful products than anything the rothschilds are up to now.

0
DuelPorpoise 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes, it’s sad to see you can’t, these families are old and large,There’s well more than a hundred of them and their associates/partners, never mind the extended family.

you should know families have children and grow in size, and over twenty years is enough time for a new generation to be born, grow up and inherit.

you should also know children suck at retaining unearned wealth, (they often lack the knowledge and skill on how the company was created and made its profits and tend to fuck with things) on average by the third generation over 70% of Families have lost their fortune.

1
DuelPorpoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

Musk owns several revolutionary companies, tesla and spacex are the most famous, followed by the boring company, a tunnel boring machine manufacturer and operator, soon to be very wealthy. and neuralink, a company working on direct brain to computer interfaces, who will be more distantly wealthy since the FDA approval process is so slow.

0
DuelPorpoise 0 points ago +1 / -1

Can you read op? The article is correct, he’s the richest person, not persons, not family, a person, an individual you might say.

1
DuelPorpoise 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uhh, is number 3 right? Cause I’ve Only heard of the first two from other sources.

2
DuelPorpoise 2 points ago +2 / -0

no, that's a poor myth, sure we didn't write down every aspect and "lost" the "tech" used to make things such as the original F1 engines, battleship sized cannons and other tech. but as with the F1, we quickly re-learned how to make a better one in a little over a year on NASA time and dime.

it's really just a jobs program, pork for companies jobs & retirement programs for congressmen, SLS could of been done years ago, if they wanted to instead the old cronie companies are milking the cost plus contract system.

You only need to look at spaceX to see what we could of been doing decades ago if the primary force behind developing space infrastructure wasn't the federal government, we had self landing rocket prototypes in the 90's and we've had the technology to make reusable rockets since the 70's

trust me, I live on the space coast, I've talked to the engineers who designed and built the space shuttle, ISS and now SLS, most know how much of a colossal waste it is epically since SpaceX has established such a good track record.

these People were originally very skeptical of a new upstart company going to orbit for so much less, they all assumed SpaceX was shedding safety for speed and cost, turned out it was just NASA bureaucracy excusing all the money spent on development in as many states as possible, on focus groups, management (who caused the challenger disaster, engineers said don't go, too cold!) and over staffing of dozens of engineers who's job was to watch a very few others work, and every part being a unique custom part, it was all justified over and over for "safety" concerns.

these same engineers who have kept track of spacex know the minute starship is flying cargo, SLS is doomed, there's no cost justification for such and expensive launch system when spacex will be flying a fully reusable launch vehicle that is more than TWO orders of magnitude cheaper in cost to orbit. (estimated cost per pound to orbit for SLS=~$18,500, starship <$100) If they're lucky, SLS will get a few launches in before it's canceled for starship.

10
DuelPorpoise 10 points ago +11 / -1

nah, it's more like, we could go back to the moon, but we need to fund the Senate Lunch System (SLS)

3
DuelPorpoise 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder how much does DDOS attacks help our traffic numbers?

7
DuelPorpoise 7 points ago +7 / -0

A good idea, but I’d rather bring back “no representation without taxation”

we originally had only property owners voting (women actually did vote but most weren’t property owners) part of the reason it was property owners only, was the federal government could only collect property taxes.

Today it’d Better to make it net taxation, if you took in more money from federal welfare programs, you would be unable to vote until you were a net tax payer again.

This would destroy the government’s ability to bribe citizens for votes (the more they give out they less voting supporters they’d have!) and stop citizens from voting for more prosperity.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›