Disagree on one point. It dominates in inner city communities that are overpopulated with shit educational systems and programs that encourage single parent family structures. The overwhelming race of those populations is a red herring. It's been formulated to target that demographic via Lyndon Johnson's inner city programs. I am not saying the criminals are not responsible for their criminal acts, just that the black community was targeted by democrats to be oppressed through public housing, which is shit tier, shit school systems, and shit welfare that pays out better for single parent homes and encourages "family planning," planned parenthood (founded by a blatant racist and eugenicist).
Now we believe the f.b.i.? That statistic is misleading in that it does not take into account the percentage of demographics that are not violent and criminal. Nor does it include levels of education, fatherless homes, locations of the most criminal activity in correlation with population density, and opportunity. I decided once not to read a book because the description was lacking in information about its contents. Its intentional, the lack of corresponding information. And you're falling for it.
When you weed a garden, do you merely clip the tops? The issue is not race, nor eliminating criminals before they commit crimes. There will always be criminals, but the overexposure is a communist tactic to sew division. You eliminate the communist mouth pieces, race baiters/grifters, politicians, and get back to some sense of normalcy. The first route would be to make it illegal to report anything on a crime until all the facts are known and jail any "journalist" who would interject his/her opinion into a story that is supposedly intended to be fact oriented, unless they preface their opinions with a clear statement to that fact. That it is simply their opinion. The next front require actually teaching people to think critically with regard to forming their own opinions when facts are presented. That responsibility falls to the parents. Also kicking our kids asses for stepping out of line.
There is some truth here. First sentence nails it. It is an intentional system overload. Then you touch on the "threat a man like an animal long enough he will eventually start acting like one." But replacing animal with racist. You lost me at the 13/52, because that 13 percent is about 42 million people. Only about 3 percent of that 13 percent are actually commiting the crimes, riots notwithstanding. So in reality it is an illusory figure meant to enflame tensions, especially when you consider how many crimes are actually committed in this country vs how many people exist in this country. Out of 350 million people the total incarceration rate is extremely small, even when including all other race demographics. It's a forced narrative based on pushing stories of a violent criminal nature to bombard the human mind into thinking that crime is at an all time high. Real time news, "if it bleeds it leads", is truly the enemy of a free people. Especially when the talking heads always feel the need to interject opinion when simple facts, after they are all available, would allow people to make up their own minds. But we now live in a world where critical thinking be hard yo.
When you realize that 13 percent encompasses 42 million people yet current incarcerations only comprise about 3% of the total population of that 13 percent, your arguement falls apart at the illumination of true statistics.
Wrong. Shared ownership does not equate to charity and sacrifice. Shared ownership is communism: wage slavery. Charity and sacrifice are the letting go of things not necessary to sustain your life, and the giving up of more than what you have/need so that another may benefit from it without any positive effect on your own life and means.
So a guy leaves a temporary mortal hellhole, and is transported in spirit form to the very presence of God in paradise, and I am to believe this world, or any part of it is greater than God? Don lemon is a satanist. He just doesn't know it yet.
No doctor is required at a birth. And no self respecting human being would give their time without compensation, excepting for charity and good will. Forcing someone to supply you with what you would need to exercise a right is slavery pure and simple. The only thing keeping the gun industry in the black, financially speaking, is it is profitable. When it becomes non profitable, an intelligent business person would not continue to produce a product that puts them in debt because you have a right to own said tools. I wonder if all the makers quit making, how would you exercise your rights, which would still exist, regardless of tool availability?
This