Trump is not a doctor and still believes in a somewhat inherrent goodness in humanity. I don't think he believes that Bill Gates and other multi national corporations would perpetrate such a crime against world populations as may be going on. When you realize the beast system is forming, and it is communism and greed pushing it, it makes sense, in that Trump isnt looking at this from a biblical perspective, much less a medical one.
All those termination points relate to others offering services for a cost. Not them having a responsibility to do so without their consent. You have a right to life, right? Does your life require the labor of others? Do they have a responsibility to labor for you, for you to live? You need a roof over your head to live a healthy life out of the weather, no? You have a right to live, and that requires clothing to aid in protection from weather elements? You have a right to live which requires food? All these are encompassed under the right to life. However, the responsibility to provide those things lays with you, and you alone. You have to pay for clothing. You have to pay for food. You have to pay rent, or a contractor, or seller, to obtain a home/dwelling. It is not anyone else's responsibility to provide anything for you. Even if it is a right, you must have the means to obtain it. The same goes for firearms.
Beyond insane? So that's your facts to support your cause? I'm a faggit? How intellectual is thy debate that we debase ourselves with verbal attacks of an irrational nature? You have shown yourself for the high and mighty mind of our time.
There is no physical risk to yourself if someone bans you, but your question implies that there may be a physical risk to others if you are banned. So your arguement is lost at the outset by the implication of a threat. "If I get banned one more time, that's it, I'll snap and be radicalized!" That is the undertone of your question and subsequent replies to my being a smartass, and poking the bear, so to speak.
But if one has the toolage, and the knowledge, and the ability, one can simply make their own. By my logic no one's labor was necessary but my own. By your logic, my firearms must be maintained by a gunsmith, and not myself. Maintenance on a firearm is a responsibility, not a right. Being able to afford a tool is a responsibility, not a right. And by afford, I do not merely mean having the means to purchase (money), that also means ability, and time and materials if one decides to make one oneself. It is not a manufacturers responsibility to supply you with a tool. It is a privilege extended to those that do not have the ability or necessary knowledge and tooling, to do so. You have a right to purchase or manufacture. They have no responsibility to you to supply it.
https://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/turning-ploughshares-into-swords-man-builds-ak-47-from-shovel/
This day and age, if you have to ask a conspiratorial question, the answer is yes.