4
EdwardSolomon 4 points ago +5 / -1

THEN EXPLAIN TO US ALL AS NATURAL EVENT.

GRACE US WITH YOUR WISDOM

ALL HAIL SATAN

5
EdwardSolomon 5 points ago +6 / -1

And it just so happens that the same model, with the same constants, fits every county?

You'd have better chances of wining the lottery ten times in a row.

5
EdwardSolomon 5 points ago +6 / -1

If you don't know what a "domain" and a "function" are, you shouldn't be commenting.

I think you're just mad I exposed you and your commie ilk by discovering the algorithm that it uniform to all of the counties.

5
EdwardSolomon 5 points ago +6 / -1

That's exactly the problem.

There are ARBITRARY CONSTANTS THAT ARE UNIFORM EVERY COUNTY.

I EXPLICITLY SAID THEY ARE ARBITRARY IN THE DOCUMENT.

How do you explain a set of arbitrary constants, including the dynamic exponential scaling factors, being uniform to every county?

Do you think that's a natural event?

You're observation is correct.

I didn 't choose those constants, the engineer did.

You're SCOLDING ME for discovering the CONSTANTS THEY USED.

WTF

WTF

Are you saying this is a natural event?

7
EdwardSolomon 7 points ago +8 / -1

Also, what have you done to show fraud.

you said working hard.

What are your results.

7
EdwardSolomon 7 points ago +9 / -2

Also, I'm not monetizing anything.

So why would I try to generate clicks to my channel?

7
EdwardSolomon 7 points ago +7 / -0

?

You can go into the data and look at Trump's starting percentages and ending percentages.

That's what I did.

They fit a polynomial with 99.8 R^2.

What about this can't be reproduced?

7
EdwardSolomon 7 points ago +9 / -2

It has a lot to do with voting.

It's how they scrambled the domains of the two polynomials.

11
EdwardSolomon 11 points ago +13 / -2

Robert Barnes is a loser.

has he provided mathematical proof of this claims, in a 77 page document?

9
EdwardSolomon 9 points ago +10 / -1

Ok. How does showing how a COMPUTER ALGORITHM in a SIMULATION VIDEO controlling election result not suffice as a presentation?

12
EdwardSolomon 12 points ago +13 / -1

It's the simulation engine I used so people could see and understand how easy it is.

6
EdwardSolomon 6 points ago +6 / -0

I hope so.

I can only provide the where and the when.

I'm not a storm trooper lol.

9
EdwardSolomon 9 points ago +9 / -0

The greatest thing about this method is that it's so obvious to a mathematician but goes over the head of anyone who isn't.

They should have used this method in GA and PA and just proclaimed Biden the President on election day.

8
EdwardSolomon 8 points ago +8 / -0

The same way Dr Shiva did.

What is Trump's starting percentage (per precinct).

What is his ending percentage (in each precinct)

What is the difference between start % times end total VS end% times end total.

16
EdwardSolomon 16 points ago +16 / -0

Explain how sqrt(pi^pi) and (2/sqrt(e))*u^(phi+ (u/(sqrt2 * u +e ^2pi) and 1/(sqrt2pi) and (u/181)*e^(2phi^2) are naturally occurring numbers in the curves that perfectly fit their crimes.

The burden is on the defense.

6
EdwardSolomon 6 points ago +7 / -1

Accidently, will try to restore

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›