Slideshow presentation and a video and a blackboard.
BItchute is still processing. Rumble is done.
Bump it pedes. My sixth sense is buzzing.
I'm going to do a 3D version (with a z axis) showing probability.
This is what I jam out to on these occasion.
Just when I thought I could sleep and get a solid night's rest, I see this article, and realize I have to go into double time.
I don't know. I only deal with discrete integers (that's my field of study).
Right now I'm delving into fraction bases for digit distribution (since 1's and 0's are discrete numbers) to try to tackle this subject of the real "fraction magic" concept.
Second, third and last digit Benford analysis (individual 2nd, and individual 3rd) are the best ways to go, as well as using smaller base numbers (Base 4 instead of Base 10).
I'm actually pioneering the field of fraction base Benford Analysis for the sake of our Republic (Base less than 2, aka binary).
https://brilliant.org/wiki/fractional-number-base/
If I get solve the riddle of binary digit distribution for fractional bases (Hypo-Benford Analysis is what I'll call it), we can analyze the claims of "votes being manipulated at the fractional level," by software such as Dominion/ES&S.
I hope I figure it out (the math of the concept in general).
The best bet is the State Legislators sending their own Electors, regardless of any SCOTUS ruling.
It's the nuclear constitutional safeguard for a crisis like this.
I had to come back again for these. Thank god you made them!
God Bless!
I call it ratio transfers between a set of zombie voting precincts being stuffed with ballots (like a DDOS attack with ballots).
They're being sent through professional channels. I'm not giving names obviously. Know that what I'm doing is not in vain.
Check this fun video out:
What else can I do? lol
How long before they ban my channel?
I'm gonna say 5-6 days.
I put a stop the steal banner.
I don't know how else to increase traction lol
Update, added general formula:
General formula for a/b, a is the recorded numerator and b is the recorded denominator.
u = margin (%) for numerator, w = margin (%) for denominator.
(2u)/100 times (3(((100+w)/100)b)^2)/(pi^2)
I need you to change "Dominion" to "ES&S" in the title. I can't change a video you uploaded.
All of the people claiming to "debunk" my Ratio transfer don't even understand saying.
They THINK I'm discussing the repeating precincts, I'm not, precincts naturally repeat until they update.
Or, they think these are the only ratios in the whole datasheet that that are shared by distinct precincts. No. It's OK if the same ratio is reported by another precinct, so long as the time difference between the reports is either several timestamps (or several hours). In fact most ratios are repeated by different precincts, but at vastly different times.
Finally they claim (the smartest of the dumb, or the smartest of the disinfo agents) that if I remove duplicate entries (from precincts not updating), that the evidence goes away. Yes, and if I bleach a murder scene the evidence also goes away.
It's actually the other way around. The dupcliate entries come from dead precincts (that no one is voting at) that the local bosses stuffed harvested ballots. Because of this I can only detect the POSITIVES between dead precincts. I also believe the system prefers these dead low turnout precincts in it's seizure logic.
Thus, I'm sure the system occasionally took live precincts as well, but I can't detect them with my "reverse algorithm" because the difference in time between the live precincts (that were seized) reporting the same ratios can't be differentiated from the legitimate data (most of of the data is clean) and ratios being reported by normal precincts that weren't seized.
Finally the "debunkers" start to play "super stupid" when I catch them in all their bullshit. They start saying "but all the ratios change, look bidens votes changed while trump's stayed the same," meanwhile I'm talking about Trump's votes to total votes, which can be obfuscated by the third party vote. They also deny that in most series of ratios that are transferred that some of the "repeat entries" are actually being updated via a direct injection votes. Although rare, there are at least 200 entries where the "repeat" actually updates with new totals, and it's the same ratios.
Finally you got the "super smart" disinfo agents that link me scatter plots of integer ratios and their intersections. The scatter plots only prove that different precincts will report the same ratios at some point. Yes, that's true, and yes most of the ratios in the datasheet that are shared between precincts are CLEAN and not suspicious, because they are reported at vastly different times. These scatter plot boys fail to add the dimensional component of TIME.
Although it's possible for ONE precinct with a ratio to stop reporting that ratio and then ANOTHER precinct picks up that ratio within one timestamp, it's INSANE when multiple precincts pick up the same ratio at the SAME TIME and then when they finally stop reporting it, another NEW SET of unique precincts picks up (AT THE SAME TIME), and that pattern of transferred ratios (within one timestamp) between new sets of precincts continuing from November 4th through November 11th.
All of the people claiming to "debunk" my Ratio transfer don't even understand saying.
They THINK I'm discussing the repeating precincts, I'm not, precincts naturally repeat until they update.
Or, they think these are the only ratios in the whole datasheet that that are shared by distinct precincts. No. It's OK if the same ratio is reported by another precinct, so long as the time difference between the reports is either several timestamps (or several hours). In fact most ratios are repeated by different precincts, but at vastly different times.
Finally they claim (the smartest of the dumb, or the smartest of the disinfo agents) that if I remove duplicate entries (from precincts not updating), that the evidence goes away. Yes, and if I bleach a murder scene the evidence also goes away.
It's actually the other way around. The dupcliate entries come from dead precincts (that no one is voting at) that the local bosses stuffed harvested ballots. Because of this I can only detect the POSITIVES between dead precincts. I also believe the system prefers these dead low turnout precincts in it's seizure logic.
Thus, I'm sure the system occasionally took live precincts as well, but I can't detect them with my "reverse algorithm" because the difference in time between the live precincts (that were seized) reporting the same ratios can't be differentiated from the legitimate data (most of of the data is clean) and ratios being reported by normal precincts that weren't seized.
Finally the "debunkers" start to play "super stupid" when I catch them in all their bullshit. They start saying "but all the ratios change, look bidens votes changed while trump's stayed the same," meanwhile I'm talking about Trump's votes to total votes, which can be obfuscated by the third party vote. They also deny that in most series of ratios that are transferred that some of the "repeat entries" are actually being updated via a direct injection votes. Although rare, there are at least 200 entries where the "repeat" actually updates with new totals, and it's the same ratios.
Finally you got the "super smart" disinfo agents that link me scatter plots of integer ratios and their intersections. The scatter plots only prove that different precincts will report the same ratios at some point. Yes, that's true, and yes most of the ratios in the datasheet that are shared between precincts are CLEAN and not suspicious, because they are reported at vastly different times. These scatter plot boys fail to add the dimensional component of TIME.
Although it's possible for ONE precinct with a ratio to stop reporting that ratio and then ANOTHER precinct picks up that ratio within one timestamp, it's INSANE when multiple precincts pick up the same ratio at the SAME TIME and then when they finally stop reporting it, another NEW SET of unique precincts picks up (AT THE SAME TIME), and that pattern of transferred ratios (within one timestamp) between new sets of precincts continuing from November 4th through November 11th.
The Ratio of TRUMP to TOTAL.
That's the L column to the J column.
It's 1 to 14.
The only precinct that isn't suspicious is the first one "Norristown 2-1," since it achieved 1:14 organically and faded on timestamp 73.
The only thing being deliberated (with other people I'm working with) is the timestamp 141 to 149 jump. It's one precinct transferred to two (both pick it up at the same time, but the actual difference in time is only 3 hours, and the midnight swap is a common element in the other transfers we identified.
When you get down to the 0.001% scale, it's better to talk actuals numbers.
There are 15 to 20 thousands precincts in Republican counties in Georgia (we'll say 20 thousand for the moment).
Now go flip 3 votes from each precinct from Trump to Biden, that's 60,000 votes.
"But my district voted 83% Trump!
And so did all your neighboring districts, and from each was flipped three votes.
Here's a live demonstration and simulation.
Watch the live simulation video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes