3
Egglet 3 points ago +3 / -0

I see a slightly different outcome, think Germany in the 30s, defunded and demoralized police replaced with a 'national police force', kind of like replacing Article 2, section 1, clause 2 of the constitution with HR 1. The federal government has its sights on controlling all things the people and the states used to control.

1
Egglet 1 point ago +1 / -0

I can't speak for all counties in all states, but I live in a southern county in MN, literally one of the best handout counties in the country, and we're about 50% Hispanics, and many of them I know are conservative voters, mostly because they are Catholics and against abortion, but also because they are genuinely conservative and many are actually against handouts and being treated differently.

5
Egglet 5 points ago +5 / -0

I hear this more and more, why do the states without mandates have more people wearing masks than not? My state still requires masks and no one wears them. I seriously wore a mask only once for 8 minutes, and I had to find and buy it. It was November 3rd of last year, if I didn't they wouldn't let me vote.

2
Egglet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Indeed, the war clock is ticking and every day we're one second closer to midnight.

2
Egglet 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everything is a good idea till OSHA is around.....

5
Egglet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Agreed, been ready since Obama militarized FEMA, and i've been sayin if they pass this abomination, it will be the second shoot heard round the world. I feel it would be a civil war in the military, a revolutionary war for us, and WWIII for earth, could get ugly....

25
Egglet 25 points ago +25 / -0

Luckily my wife and I are very confident that our immune systems are capable of fighting for themselves and are strongly against vaccination of our 3 year old daughter, but this is an absolutely horrible and heartbreaking story, I feel for the parents.

3
Egglet 3 points ago +6 / -3

Yes, the probability of it is minute, however, if Trump would have done it or still does in the future, all evidence would be brought in front of a court and finally they couldn't say there was no evidence of fraud. Better yet though, Senate seats could be challenged the same way, and in their own states, that could be bigger than flipping the presidency with the dem super majority currently raping the American people.

2
Egglet 2 points ago +5 / -3

True, but a Writ of Quo Warranto is a challenge to the right of a seat, it's in a district court and it's a jury trial, and it cannot be ignored or thrown out, it's a civil suit to a government seat, it's a very old and obscure law that came here with us from Britain and found it's way into our constitution, that is assuming the constitution means anything anymore.

27
Egglet 27 points ago +30 / -3

There is actually a mechanism for challenging a government seat as illegitimate, Writ of Quo Warranto. If Wisconsin actually decides that their elections were fraudulent and a correct count would change the outcome, then all who lost but should have won will be filing for their rightful seat.

1
Egglet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Don't get me wrong, I agree with you, the fact of the matter is there was definitely voter fraud, but it only happened because the election laws were changed illegally. The courts failed to judge the illegality of those elections, the federal legislature allowed them to be counted, and Trump was required to order the arrest of all parties responsible for those elections and the supreme court justices that did not dissent on the TX case ruling. I believe the military is more to blame than any, they are required to protect the constitution from enemies foreign and domestic, they should have done what the Myanmar military did and arrest them all and have a contingent election, instead they allowed a democratic super majority to illegally install themselves into our government. Now the constitution will be erased one bullshit law at a time and election fraud is the new normal and the supreme court made it a precedent.

1
Egglet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fraud doesn't matter at all. Fraud occurred, but it was a result of those states breaking the law, Article 2, section 1, clause 2 of the constitution, only the state legislature can change election laws, not governors, secretaries of state or as in PA, judges. Even if Trump won, the states held an illegal election and their electoral votes do not count. The supreme court is required under their oath to have taken the TX case, the federal legislature allowed the illegal votes to be counted and Trump, the chief executive of the executive (law enforcement) branch failed his oath also. All three branches of government and our military committed treason to the people and the constitution of the United States.

3
Egglet 3 points ago +3 / -0

I completely agree, I saw 1 vote split into multiple partial votes in CA, the question is WHY did Sydney refute her own statements in front of the judge? The evidence would burn dominion to the ground, so why did she say no one believed the machines switched any votes?

12
Egglet 12 points ago +12 / -0

Perhaps you should read her response to the suit, she said everything was fiction and that nobody believed that the machines had anything to do with vote tampering, I lost all respect for her at that moment yesterday, especially since the machine records from CA clearly show votes being split, I'm pissed, but they could destroy her, shes in self defense mode now.

1
Egglet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because science to a democrat is like the constitution to a democrat, only relevant when it suits their agenda.

1
Egglet 1 point ago +1 / -0

Honestly, the fences aren't there for January 6th, the threat was gone the next day. The soldiers are there for the future, think of the quote that floats around this site from time to time, "The only reason the government would try to take your guns away after 244 years, means they are about to do something that you would shoot them for." I have a feeling they will be ramming through legislation that will leave the American people no option but to sacrifice everything, or lose everything. In my personal opinion, the government has pushed us to the edge of a cliff, you either let them push over the edge to your death or you push back, the time to push back is drawing nearer every single day. I would rather die on my feet than live on my knees.

2
Egglet 2 points ago +2 / -0

If H.R. 1 passes, voting will be null and void, all future elections will have no consequence and once it passes, revolution is literally the only option left, that's why the capital still looks like fortress.

6
Egglet 6 points ago +6 / -0

Let us never forget, fraud was a result of 6 states violating Article 2, section 1, clause 2 of the constitution. Their elections were illegal, the supreme court refused to judge the illegality of those elections, the federal legislature allowed the illegally selected electoral votes to be counted and the executive branch and military didn't stop it or arrest anyone. The entire government committed treason to the people and the constitution of the United States.

2
Egglet 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will not take the vax in hand I will not take it on water or land I will not take it in a house It hasn't been tested on a mouse I would not take it on a bet I would not take it on a jet I will not let you give my arm a prick Now go to hell and suck my dick

Canceled? I see more potential than ever. 😉

2
Egglet 2 points ago +2 / -0

I honestly don't think it's about Democrats, it's about fortifying deep state candidates and excluding candidates of, by and for the people.

5
Egglet 5 points ago +5 / -0

Exactly, that's what H.R. 1 is all about, "fortifying" every single election going forward.

view more: Next ›