I'm not a keyboard warrior that will engage in an internet argument with you where we're throwing articles back and forth at each other, cherry-picking statistical data points. But I see you accomplished what you intended, smear the post with scarecrow arguments and fallacies merely seconds after it was posted. You're attacking the argument on a circumvential basis, not on the basis of the "merits," as they would say. Instead of mindlessly uttering, "citations or didnt happen," when you could easily go to the FDA publications yourself (as I referenced by the way), be a little more bold than that: do you dispute the approximate 0.02% rate of Bell's palsy development in these trials? That's what I thought, you do not, because the necessary facts to understanding the basis of this case are published in the FDA's report.
Let me ask you, do you have a rationale for why the frequency of Bell's palsy manifestation occurred at a rate of 0.02% within 1-2 month timespan, whereas the typical timespan of Bell's palsy which you're citing is 1-year? If you are not observing the timespans properly, then you are overlooking an approximate 9-fold increase in frequency. You have yet to dispute that these manifestations of Bell's palsy occurred within a 1-2 month time span, which is itself the fundamental basis of this post. Instead, you make circumvential attacks ignoring the fundamental basis. I will not continue to indulge a back-and-forth with a troll.
She's basically saying to Trump's critics, "Yeah it's true that Trump isn't perfect, but he's protecting your democracy."
That's what conservatives do. They build things. And that's what democrats do. They take things.
I think you're letting your personal biases impact your interpretation of this clip. In my view, it was an unfortunate bad first impression based on a brief moment of miscommunication.
If you watch closely, you will observe that Alex went into the situation with a bit of a forced smile. I've seen people do this before, they force a smile, and it has a very disconcerting effect on others.
If you watch Flynn carefully, he actually seemed pretty warm-hearted at first. Then you'll see Alex ask, "Are you scared?" The voice intonation behind this could have been accidentally interpreted as taunting in nature, but if you couple this with the fact that Flynn said, "What?", you see that Flynn's tone of voice actually changed. His tone was at first warm, then it went to alarmed. I'm not sure he quite heard what Alex said or quite grasped the initial intention.
That's why Alex followed up with, hastily, "No, I mean . . . " He obviously also had the impression that Flynn mistook his intentions as mockery rather than comradery.
It was a simple miscommunication that led to an unpleasant interaction. I think Alex meant well, but his forced smile probably offput Flynn. Coupled with the brief "You scared?" that Flynn didn't grasp immediately, it would make sense that Flynn's voice intonation would shift from warmth to alarmed.
Indeed, it's unfortunate they had poor first impressions, and I hope this doesn't carry into their future relations. Nonetheless, I support both individuals. I think anyone who criticizes Alex or Flynn are probably psyop trolls stirring internal division in the Trump ranks; either that, or they don't understand that Alex is actually a very moderate guy. Believe it or not, not everyone hates jews... Lol, but then again, I can't tell if these people calling Alex a zionist Shill are actually real or if they're psyop trolls. As for Flynn, he is respectable and honorable; anyone that's attacking him clearly... Actually, I won't bother with commenting on that.
And PA supreme court I guess
My bad, the defendant states are saying that apparently.
And, many election statutes were violated ON THE DAY OF ELECTION.
Also, they made many of their unconstitutional changes and alterations to violate legislative election statutes in the last minute. Which, by definition, means we would have been unable to sue before the election in the first place!
Whatever happens, those Georgia 5th elections are an opportunity to expose the fraud altogether. That opportunity should not altogether be forsaken. Now is the chance to get a true tally of the people's opinion.
Sure, some people might say Alex Jones is "too far" for most mainstream middle-ground Republicans. But the fact is, we're always compromising by electing these RINOs. If we're going to compromise in who we're electing, then let's at least elect people like Alex Jones.
Fundamentally, we have to ask, what entity was it that requested 240k ballots in the names of voters without them knowing?
The emblem should be a dragon, not a lion. #DragonEnergy
I appreciate all of the constructive feedback. You know, there's nothing wrong with me offering some ideas here. We have to be able to brainstorm ideas in order to try to maximize our operational success in backing Trump. I think some of my points in here are very valid -- I've met too many people that haven't seen these videos of "Comrade Biden" and Biden's aneurisms, so I stand by my statement that we need to do better at getting information to cross the feeds of other circles on the internet. As a country, we have to be able to get information into the hands of our fellow Americans, whatever side they're on. I don't understand why this upsets people, but to each his own. Yes, thedonald.win has statistics showing it's popular, but you're missing the point. We need to get information beyond Trump circles, into the hands of Independents and Democrats -- that's the main point. More importantly, you probably should not be so hostile to someone who's just trying give ideas to help you. In no way am I pretending to be "greater than thou," part of idea formulation is conversation and healthy debate, not nasty attacks and insults which are totally uncalled for.
tl;dr we have to get information beyond Trump circles, and I think thedonald.win and banned.video alter our perceptions of what information is truly "exposed," when exposure is really dissemination, not necessarily public publication itself. The Oligarchs understand this and this is why they feed you Snopes and CNN articles on your Twitter feeds. It's not just about information, but information flow into different demographic circles. This is an information flow war.
I hear this a lot from liberals. "Yeah I'm voting blue and yeah taxes are probably going to go up, so I'll probably just move somewhere else after that happens." what the fuck............................