Of course it's treason. The military might be based but the generals are not (and the military is trained to listen to the chain of command), and I wouldn't put anything past the deep state - even outright treason. Hell, Pelosi is doing exactly that when trying to convince the Pentagon to ignore Trump's order. Trump will know whether he has people who will carry out his orders or not (but he might be severely doubtful if people pretending to be on his side all just came out and revealed themselves to be traitors conspiring against him, like Pence).
You think Graham didn't call the President and blackmail him with the vote of the Senate? Because that sounds exactly like what Graham would do and it makes the entire conspiracy, Trump's "disappointing" actions, make sense.
I agree. And to be honest, I don't think he actually ever trusted the GOP (although of course he would have outwardly pretended he did because that's how you make allies). I know that isn't too popular a take on this site but I think Trump knows a hell of a lot more about the mechanics of gaining and maintaining power than the posters here (who'd have been 25thed by Pence and Rod Rosenstein a few months in), and knew you couldn't take over a political party and a state apparatus overnight (not without coming across as too radical and losing the support of the people outside of his most enthusiastic base).
He knew he was surrounded by snakes on all sides but look at what he accomplished. The largest number of voters a President has ever received, a GROWING rather than shrinking movement, a GOP that at least pretended to bend the knee out of fear for his voters, kingmaker not just of the GOP but of conservative media (he killed Fox and he told the CEO of Newsmax he could get the entire audience to leave Newsmax with a Tweet and he's right)... and if he does run again in 2024, he'll win.
Trump said the MAGA movement is just beginning. I don't know what his plan is, whether it's the plan everyone gets called a "doomer" for even mentioning (just like you'd get called a "doomer" for correctly predicting the SC would throw out the suit and that Pence would turn on him), or whether he still has an ace up his sleeve, but I'm following Trump.
I'm not sure. We don't know what Trump knows, what his actual options are in front of him. There's plenty of options a President SHOULD have on the table (like the Insurrection Act), but the conspiracy against him doesn't care at all about laws. Pelosi is literally trying to commit a military coup against the President and have the Pentagon ignore his orders. Pence and McConnell literally deployed the National Guard on their own, coordinating with the Secretary of Defense.
It might be that they all played Trump and now his options are truly limited. We just don't know. He could have put out the video just to con the conspiracy, get them off his back for a second and convince the RINOs to avoid convicting him in the forthcoming impeachment. Then he'll make his move anyway. Or he might have truly been outplayed (this time).
You mean, when Hitler invaded them after World War II was already well underway, taking strategic territory became the only priority as it does in any war, and literally all of Europe was essentially in play in a do-or-die war for Germany's survival? Belgium and the Netherlands were necessary to defeat France as part of the Manstein Plan (blitzkrieg through the Ardennes), and Denmark and Norway were invaded because France and Britain were openly planning to invade and occupy them first as part of their Plan R 4. That's what war is like.
I didn't say whether it's fair or unfair, nor did I say Hitler was a victim. Germany lost a war, the Treaty of Versailles (considered to be draconian and unfair even for a post-war treaty) humiliated them and stripped them of territory (and the British Foreign Minister, Arthur Balfour, even warned that it was unwise for Germany to lose any territory to Poland as it would inevitably cause another war), Hitler rose to power, and retook the German territory from Poland. Britain and France declared war on Germany contrary to Hitler's expectations, and the war was on.
Britain and France declared war on Germany because Hitler invaded Poland and you're blaming their deaths in war on Hitler? As for Poland, Hitler wanted to expand east, yes, as I said; he did not want to go to war with the west and his diplomats had advised him Britain and France would not go to war with Germany over Poland.
Poland had cities and territories, like Danzig, that were inhabited by Germans; not only that, it had many territories that were literally parts of Germany before World War I. After World War I, Germany was strongarmed into the Treaty of Versailles, which ceded the Free City of Danzig and the right to extraterritorial roads across the Polish Corridor. Germany lost a lot of territory to Poland in the Treaty of Versailles; West Prussia, the Province of Posen, East Upper Silesia. If Arizona, New Mexico and Texas had been given away to Mexico during Obama's term and American citizens were now being governed by the Mexican government, don't you think Trump would invade Mexico to get them back? And if Britain, France, and the rest of the world declared war on America for it, would Trump kicking their asses and conquering Europe before being surrounded on all sides and eventually beaten make Trump the greatest killer of white people?
"Killed more white people?" That's a weird way of putting "Killed more communists."
FUCKING LEGEND
I'll leave you to AOC's boobs, which for some reason you seem obsessed with, then. We have the best retards, so I guess you're alright. Go on your way, bless your heart.
I'm engaged to a model, no thanks. Now how about you answer my question, retard? Or stop blowing hot air out of your ass.
Just a retard troll but I'm bored enough to feed him.
Retarded take. What's my agenda, then? And what's yours? Because I'll bet it's a lot more diluted than mine.
Because I didn't see the posts, otherwise I wouldn't have made another one. Obviously.
As for Matthew McConaughey, you're going to see a lot of people who used to hate on conservatives come around in the future. Do you think Trump gained 75 million votes (probably actually 80 million) votes last year because he only won conservatives? Hell no. The left, the media and big tech is alienating so many people, you're seeing centrists and Democrats (#WalkAway, which I was part of) pouring into MAGA's big tent.
She Tweeted that after. Trust me, I used to say things just like this when I was wavering on the fence. You say something semi-based in disgust and shock at how crazy things are getting, you get disapproving reactions, you get worried and modulate it to sound a bit more leftie... But the doubt still lingers. The more insane the left, the media and big tech gets, the more even left-wingers will join MAGA.
Same. The MAGA movement grew by 12 million (probably actually 20 million) in four years. How many more millions will join the coalition in the years to come?
Celebrity/model. Not a fan, but the point is, this will redpill more people than we think.
Fuck, I was a Bernie bro in 2016 and both GOP and DNC are dead to me. MAGA all the way. The world is too insane for anything less.
Because simping over a model is not the point. The point is a snowball starts rolling, picking up more snow. Kanye West coming out as a Jordan Peterson and Donald Trump fan. Matthew McConaughey coming out as a "radical centrist" type, Jordan Peterson fan. Even in the leftist vipers' nest of celebrities, little embers of unrest are beginning to cinder. The MAGA flame will burn.
Maybe not today. It might be two years from now, three years. But the MAGA coalition will keep adding millions.
It wasn't a braindead reason at all; Russia broke its treaty with Napoleon and refused to abide by the continental system (i.e. they continued trading with and aiding Britain), and Napoleon actually came very close to conquering Russia; if a few little things had gone differently, he would have been master of all Europe.
As for the Nazis, I'm really not sure how to respond to your claim the Nazis "failed to harm the interests of the Zionists." They are kinda famous for a certain thing...
And Hitler made some compromises with wolves to gain their support and gain power, and as soon as he had it, he purged said wolves in a way that Trump (unfortunately) has not had the political capital to do.
Crossdressing faggots? The Nazis were extremely anti-degeneracy. Yes, there were a few prominent gay Nazis.
Occult Satanists? There were some Norse neo-pagans, yes, but the vast majority of the Nazis were either secular or Christian.
As for bankers who support the MAGA movement, of course there are. Steve Bannon himself is a former Goldman Sachs investment banker. Is he a globalist turncoat? Not at all.
And if your explanation for autarky - the Nazis' anti-globalism economic policy of a purely national, self-dependent economy - is that it was a solution ready to go for international bankers' problem, I don't think there's much more I can say. By the same logic, Trump's similarly protectionist, anti-globalist America First policies are just the plot of international bankers, too.
Would you not agree with the common refrain among historians that, if Hitler had died before 1939, he would have probably been remembered as the greatest German statesman in history? While I'm not down with Hitler's anti-Semitism (an unfortunately common view at the time that got exacerbated by the degree to which international bankers fought the Nazis and got mixed in with his otherwise correct anti-globalist, anti-communist views) and I'm a supporter of Israel (although funnily enough, the Nazis were actually initially encouraging of the Zionist movement, of the Jews leaving Germany and having their own ethnostate in their ancestral land), I don't think it's Hitler apologetics to point out that he is excessively maligned by the victors just as Napoleon was, just as Trump will be.
Emperor Napoleon was a great leader, an elected Emperor, who united the peoples of Europe against the corrupt establishment of the old European monarchies. He was part of the great renaissance of ancient Roman-inspired politics in the late 18th and early 19th centuries; America was the restoration of the Roman Republic, the French Empire was the restoration of the Roman Empire, and Napoleon came close to achieving what had not been done since the Caesars.
As for German history, you're completely muddying the waters. International bankers masterminded World War I, sure, and masterminded Germany's defeat; the Nazis were well aware of this and it was one of their main rallying cries against international bankers; the "stab-in-the-back" concept (that contemporary establishment historians call the "stab-in-the-back myth").
Saying they were funded by globalists is as silly as saying the MAGA movement is funded by globalists, because the MAGA movement has some rich international people investing in it. It completely misses the overall anti-establishment, anti-globalist, populist nationalist thrust of the Nazi movement.
And neither will Trump. It's obvious he's not going anywhere, that he'll keep fighting with every bone in his body, through every plausible option available to him.