Enlightenment_Now 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry to say it but that does bother me.

Gruesome Newsom's ex.

That can't be good.

Feels uncomfortably close to the enemy.

Enlightenment_Now 2 points ago +2 / -0

Pick me!

Okay, put me in charge of DHS. There would be mass deportations on Day 1.

I'd get this country back to its cultural roots.

Enlightenment_Now 1 point ago +1 / -0

I STILL don't trust him.

I appreciate what he's doing but I don't want him in the White House.

How about Speaker? That's far enough away. He'd probably be a good Speaker.

Enlightenment_Now 1 point ago +1 / -0

And I think you're right.

Turned out that the military was creating this injectable bioweapon. That's why Watts vs DoD -- a student took the jab, died, and his family is suing the Dept of Defense.


Enlightenment_Now 6 points ago +6 / -0

Wow -- that's in one of the famous examples.

A: You can't park here.

B (politely): Are you leaving now?

A: No, but you still can't park here.

Enlightenment_Now 6 points ago +6 / -0

I can picture it, taste it, imagine it floating in the air and follow it around the house in my mind, and feel it as I take a bite out of it.

Yuck. That was a green one. Not sweet enough. I prefer the red ones.

Enlightenment_Now 3 points ago +3 / -0

Only 25% have an inner monologue -- and that's not all the time.

Studies vary but I think the 80-20 rule probably applies, with 20% of the population having an inner monologue as the default. All the time.

Then an additional group having it most of the time, graduating downward.

I'm willing to bet it's connected to IQ but I haven't seen any studies on it.

But this explains why people go on feeling and why they get frustrated when you give them facts. Why you can't liberate someone who's leftist -- they don't have the inner tools to grasp facts. They can memorize them but not really grasp them.

Case in point: That guy who couldn't explain systemic racism without using the word "racist," whose organization or department was found to be in disarray.

They can't really comprehend logic, not fully. They can't "talk it out" in their minds. They can't verbalize it.

They are controlled by feeling, emotion.

Enlightenment_Now 11 points ago +11 / -0

Not the UK. They're dying from this.

No one in the West should be allowing invaders in.

Danged Coudenhove-Kalergi.

Enlightenment_Now 7 points ago +7 / -0

No, old is cruel. It's like calling a man short.

Even if he is short, you don't call him that. He can't control it.

But fat and ugly? Have at it. Those are things she CAN do something about. If she chooses not to, oh well.

Enlightenment_Now 2 points ago +2 / -0

Shoot, the meme was clever! I appreciated it and I certainly don't care about sportsball or Taylor Swift.

Enlightenment_Now 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hadn't seen it until last night.

It may be old but it's useful to inform normies.

Enlightenment_Now 1 point ago +2 / -1

And that is why, when this mess is over, we bring back the anti-commie laws.

We'll have good data on why it is not unconstitutional to outlaw the structure designed to destroy said constitution. No free speech there.

Enlightenment_Now 1 point ago +1 / -0

I like this part:

For some reason, mainstream commentators like Michelle Goldberg never mention Kendi’s solution to the inequality problem. Here it is:

“To fix the original sin of racism, Americans should pass an anti-racist amendment to the U.S. Constitution that enshrines two guiding anti-racist principals: Racial inequity is evidence of racist policy and the different racial groups are equals. The amendment would make unconstitutional racial inequity over a certain threshold, as well as racist ideas by public officials (with “racist ideas” and “public official” clearly defined). It would establish and permanently fund the Department of Anti-racism (DOA) comprised of formally trained experts on racism and no political appointees. The DOA would be responsible for preclearing all local, state and federal public policies to ensure they won’t yield racial inequity, monitor those policies, investigate private racist policies when racial inequity surfaces, and monitor public officials for expressions of racist ideas. The DOA would be empowered with disciplinary tools to wield over and against policymakers and public officials who do not voluntarily change their racist policy and ideas.”

Kendi, in short, wants a totalitarian body composed of “formally trained experts on racism”–that is, people like himself–to exert total power over our laws and public officials. Why doesn’t anyone ever mention this?

Enlightenment_Now 2 points ago +2 / -0

I was on a jury once. Everyone agreed the guy was guilty except one black woman.

She was didn't want to vote guilty because of the mistaken belief that black men are targeted by the police for no reason at all aside from their skin.

I don't think she hated white people; she was just dumb.

She finally saw the light, thank goodness. Voted guilty with the rest of us.

Enlightenment_Now 1 point ago +1 / -0

Of the twins, one was a doctor and the other was a pharmacist.

They worked with a second pharmacist named Shayla.

Enlightenment_Now 2 points ago +2 / -0

Bush, at this rate.

(I'm referring to finding out that there was a pic of Barack Obama and George Bush Sr when Obama was 8.)

Enlightenment_Now 5 points ago +6 / -1


Still, that it goes back to such a young age was a bit of a surprise. I knew he was groomed since he was a teenager.

But a picture of him at 8 years of age with Bush Sr?

That raised my eyebrows.

view more: Next ›