1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

You should have put in parenthesis that a recount is not equal to an audit. Those morons think that recounting a bunch of fraudulent ballots is the same as an actual audit.

2
EpicBaldGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Confucius says Biden is a little bitch who is turned on by white gloves.

2
EpicBaldGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't tell you why, but to me Pramila Jayapal looks like Babu Frik

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's shitty, I know. But the truth is that they can't. I know you might think of it as a left wing talking point, but Parler relied on AWS hosts, which Amazon obviously owns. If, say, an organization was transferring child pornography on a website that was on AWS, then Amazon would (and should) take it down. Likewise, if there was an organization that was transferring messages that call for violence, then Amazon would also take it down. Selling illegal drugs on a website hosted on AWS? Amazon takes it down, etc.

Twitter and Facebook skirt past this because they are protected by section 230 and they host their "platforms" on their own servers.

However, there may be some chance of contacting Twitter and Facebook's domain registrar and telling them that these services also contain death threats and organizations that call for violence. If there is something in their terms of service they might be violating, then there might be grounds for action to be taken on the registrars. And if they don't want to be sued, then they might put pressure on Twitter and Facebook like how Amazon, Google, and Apple did with Parler. But I am no lawyer, just spitballing here.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's shitty, I know. But the truth is that they can't. I know you might think of it as a left wing talking point, but Parler relied on AWS hosts, which Amazon obviously owns. If, say, an organization was transferring child pornography on a website that was on AWS, then Amazon would (and should) take it down. Likewise, if there was an organization that was transferring messages that call for violence, then Amazon would also take it down. Selling illegal drugs on a website hosted on AWS? Amazon takes it down, etc.

Twitter and Facebook skirt past this because they are protected by section 230 and they host their "platforms" on their own servers.

However, there may be some chance of contacting Twitter and Facebook's domain registrar and telling them that these services also contain death threats and organizations that call for violence. If there is something in their terms of service they might be violating, then there might be grounds for action to be taken on the registrars. And if they don't want to be sued, then they might put pressure on Twitter and Facebook like how Amazon, Google, and Apple did with Parler. But I am no lawyer, just spitballing here.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just more evidence that we are living in clown world/the twilight zone.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

As much as I hate what happened to Parler, they didn't own the physical hardware that they were running the service on. Where Twitter and Facebook control their own datacenters. It is the unfortunate truth, and I am surprised that Ben doesn't understand that concept.

2
EpicBaldGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Isn't XRP centralized? I wouldn't trust it.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

2 year old article. Best to take it down before the wolves on TDW get ya.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

He's got a fancy red coat voice, isn't that enough?

2
EpicBaldGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

He might be able to go back to selling videos of being fucked by his uncle.

2
EpicBaldGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Jamie Dimon is another moron in a suit. 3 years ago, he swore that Bitcoin was a losing investment because it wasn't FIAT based currency. But in the same sentence, he stated that he didn't understand "the value of something that doesn't have actual value". Which is what FIAT currency is. He in the finance sector of the swamp and he's just another swamp creature.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +2 / -1

This is nothing to be concerned about. We control much more important aspects such as agriculture and manufacturing. We can do without their social media platforms and nutjob Hollywood celebrities. The closest they've got to farming is laying down cardboard and putting soil on it. For entertainment, I have TDW and some other alternatives. More will come too. They are just too stupid to understand that we are not just going to sit there and not do anything to build our own shit.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nice. More words of encouragement. People like you are putting hate on people who are on the same side who just want to help. Looks like TDW has people who like to eat their own. No wonder the left winning.

Stating that this is nothing more than a nothing burger and moving on is all you had to do. Looking at it now, this seems to look like some PSYOPs commie shit. Maybe I'll stick around knowing that there are just people who will land here not looking to get people up to speed or to disseminate information which could be helpful. People like yourself who are not interested in seeking justice or the way of life that our founding fathers intended us to have.

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sorry, I didn't know how TDW would take the effort to put this out there. But if you don't think that it is worth presenting such information, whether credible, helpful, or otherwise, I suppose I won't do it again. Basically, you've lost a contributor to push for information, which apparently is super helpful for the cause.

I am a supporter of this country and Trump, and will be taking my efforts elsewhere where other patriots can be more encouraging.

3
EpicBaldGuy 3 points ago +3 / -0

No. They make money on you. If you participate, they get more money. You need to leave! Simple supply and demand!

1
EpicBaldGuy 1 point ago +1 / -0

hahaha ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿคฃ

3
EpicBaldGuy 3 points ago +3 / -0

The FBI put about 10 people on the most wanted list for the "violence" that occurred on the 6th. Yet we still don't know the identity of man who shot Ashli Babbitt. George Flydd died on May 25, 2020. Derek Chauvin was arrested 4 days later on the 29th. This considering that there were still questions what exactly happened. In the case of the murder of Ashlii Babbitt, it was due to a gun shot. She was unarmed and unless she had a significant amount of fentanyl in her bloodstream, I would think that this is an open and shut case. How long until we get the name of the officer who shot her?!

2
EpicBaldGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Sadly, he'll die from natural causes before that idea even gets moving.

2
EpicBaldGuy 2 points ago +2 / -0

Honestly, he should have joined Parker months ago to force people onto another platform. Twitter gets away with this shit because they can.

view more: Next ›