Also I think they just know they're supposed to say it, even if they are not. I'm living on a college campus and most young students don't care about the wuflu at all. They just want compliance and they posture about following the rules to feel better about themselves, even if they aren't scared of getting sick themselves.
Nice. I've been wondering... wouldn't the Supreme Court have to rule it constitutional before packing the courts? I don't think the constitution can be blatantly ignored without the Supreme Court ruling it unconstitutional.
As an atmospheric/aquatic chemist myself, I see many scientists in my field who get their sole motivation from politics. It is why most of them have trained to become environmental scientists in the first place, so i have almost no openly conservative friends in a sea of liberalism. The most compromised part of my field is climate modeling, which has a few egregious bias-stroking actors that seek to cause alarm. Thankfully my group is not engaged in that, and many of these scientists are called out for their BS, but MSM cherrypicks the studies that fit their narrative and just run with it. The MSM has no claim to poise as accredited science communicators.
Everyone here should know the "cherry picking data fallacy." Scientists can't just pick the data points that fulfill their hypotheses out of a bunch of scattered results. It is intellectually dishonest and counterproductive to the field. But by nature of news coverage, only one video can be shown at a time. It is a single data point from thousands of other incidents filmed and unfilmed. No news source can give us a full picture of reality, and they know fully that they can manipulate the public's impression on people, and the public's opinion of justice.
Indiana here, in 2016 I let the country down by voting Hillary. College campuses really do indoctrinate students. Started thinking for myself last year and today, FOR THE FIRST TIME, I voted for as many republican candidates as possible.