8
F5F5F5 8 points ago +10 / -2

Yeah man that's exactly what I was thinking, and it's not only a shitty camera but a shitty video file, it is smaller in size than the other video that CodeMonkeyZ uploaded. It's 270x480 pixels, it's smaller than my nutsack. Why?

2
F5F5F5 2 points ago +2 / -0

Absolutely true that it is an honor system.

Until every voter is given a chance to verify that their vote is counted, and counted accurately, the election is bogus. It is possible to produce such a system where the counting process is transparent, the only thing necessary is that it would require every single voter confirming their vote in order to trust it. If not, the system is bogus. The funny thing is, that idea of a system, even with lazy voters who do not verify, would still have more integrity than the current system.

It has always been the case that , it is built that way. Even the voting machines themselves are severely vulnerable to compromise (in fact it was proven that Domninion's voting machines were running an over 5 year old build of Android, which comes with 5 years of vulnerabilities in Android and Linux kernel, and that report was made as recently as THIS YEAR). There has been some public attention on the vulnerability of voting machines, ever since the Diebold-brand machines used in the 2000s, but for some reason, there is no public attention on the rest of the process, the most important part.

That's why I believe all of the software ever released by companies like Dominion to local governments should be made available for everyone to retrieve. Also, any system software they produce for their own hardware (like voting machines) should be made available, at least in their released form.

But instead, we have public officials vouching for their "intellectual property" and explicitly rejecting any analysis of their software, let alone the full public release of their software.

-2
F5F5F5 -2 points ago +1 / -3

No it's not. The video quality is garbage, and it is garbage even for 2010 standards. Why are we getting shit-awful quality when even the cheapest iPhone from 2016 can capture 4K video?

6
F5F5F5 6 points ago +8 / -2

This video is 270 x 480 pixels, yet the cheapest iPhone from 2016 has 4K video capture, why the fuck are we getting a video smaller than 720p, let alone 1080p HD resolution, when we're dealing with election fraud?

The other video he posted has better quality, though. Why are we getting awful quality in the most important video of the two, the one showing the alleged fraud take place? What the fuck is this?