4
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 4 points ago +4 / -0

Not really. We have the data to run audits on samples we know will be even more fraudulent than the norm, which was already bad enough to change the outcome. That is why we can't be allowed to truly audit anything. Technically, muddying the waters is just more fraud. The time constraints are what rule that out, among other things.

4
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 4 points ago +4 / -0

That stock is ridiculous. It's up like 800% in a year after they were already established based on all this intangible justification, one guy pretty much, and I don't know what would bring it down besides him leaving.

8
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 8 points ago +8 / -0

He was on a bit of a bender. His claims are valid. I don't know how threatened he would be if it is only vengeance at this point. The info is public now. We know where to look and what we will find because of this. He lays out the method to apply it elsewhere as well. It's possible that it was already discovered through other means, like looking at the code, but this shows that the code was actually used and how and where and to what degree. It better be in court.

11
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 11 points ago +11 / -0

Either way, anywhere with paper ballots will have to match up to the algorithm. What that means is that we know exactly where the incorrect counts and/or fraudulent votes will be. You can do a limited, targeted audit and make it look even more widespread than it is, which is already shown to be more than large enough to be consequential to the race.

5
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 5 points ago +5 / -0

Geometric proofs were how the Greeks used to do it before that guy al gebra. I figured you just switched it over to illustrate for the visual learners because algebra is gobbledygook to us foolish mortals.

6
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 6 points ago +6 / -0

He lays out his method for finding it somewhere around 1:15:00 in. With the same type of data, you should be able to find out if this method was used. I would want a qualified person to do it, because you can get false positives at higher numbers and an expert can express their confidence statistically with numbers.

10
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 10 points ago +10 / -0

He lays out his method for finding it somewhere around 1:15:00 in. With the same type of data, you should be able to find out if this method was used. I would want a qualified person to do it, because you can get false positives at higher numbers and an expert can express their confidence statistically with numbers.

12
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 12 points ago +12 / -0

You would know where to look and what to expect. The amount of time a precinct is seized and it's normal ratio would determine how many ballots are wrong or fraudulent. You wouldn't hit the number right on the nose if they went outside their average during the time they were seized. Technically, if you wanted to do a limited audit, you would be able to make it look worse than it even is. Just audit those precincts in Fulton county that were seized for a long time. Overall, ~200,000 votes were flipped.

20
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 20 points ago +20 / -0

With paper ballots, It should point to which closets have skeletons and tell you ahead of time how many skeletons you will find in each and every closets. Skeletons are fraudulent votes and closets are precincts.

That judge would have to be cock blocking.

7
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 7 points ago +7 / -0

So you can use this theorem and figure all this out because they had more exact percentages that are unlikely to be the ratio of any real numerator and denominator? In other tables for other states they have less exact percentages that are apparently cached and reconciled for edison data so the mechanism might be indistinguishable from the method. They could either skim or just obfuscate against what you are doing here. I'm kind of talking out of my ass, but this is how I figure things out.

30
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 30 points ago +30 / -0

I'm only 15 minutes in and not as mathy as I pretend to be. Would it be accurate to say that they shuffled in a specific, artificial vote ratio to different precincts on a rotating basis and you derived the algorithm they used to distribute that ratio? Would it be happening more in Fulton based on them counting last? It being distributed more out of necessity?

1
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Allow me to infer your opinion based on the video you provided so I can fact check your opinion.

There is no opinion on the other side. They either don't know the premise, aren't allowed one, or they consider their opinion a fact.

1
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fourth box. You're responsible for yourself and your family. We've moved as one up to now. Nobody can guarantee the future.

3
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think it was the chyral version of an existing, safe drug. Chemically, a mirror image, but technically different. Turns out that was a big difference and now your kids don't have arms or legs.

1
FancyBeerCoozyBeer 1 point ago +1 / -0

Let's see, uh 3 years on these corruption charges just a few more to wrap it up. Oh now let's tack treason on there, that might take another decade to build the case. Hopefully they don't do any more terrible shit worse than treason or maybe they'll just walk free until they die of old age.

COURTMARSHALL

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›