They made up numbers for how many votes he got rather than counting votes. You would assert that with some kind of confidence interval based on the sample size. You could only isolate it at the expense of that sample size.
The sample is district vote totals within a county. Those county's ballots should be audited and traced because impropriety would be uncovered on ballots for Biden or those ballots won't exist.
To what degree and how relevant that is, is a legal matter.
You can't count to 9 without a 1. You'll be seeing another 1 sooner rather than later after that because we use base 10. It doesn't go up an order of magnitude incredibly often at a point, so that causes a differential that can be captured by sampling and shown in those nifty graphs.
The simplest explanation is that It's because you have to count to 1 before you count to 9.
The magic is in the pudding though. That gets distributed along the orders of magnitude of our base 10 system. For each 9, there is guaranteed to be 1 in the works and another one coming right up until you get to a stopping point.
So you take a big enough sample of those stopping points, naturally occurring numbers, not made up numbers, and you get that distribution.
The sample in this case is district totals within a county. It tells you where to look. If those counties aren't audited, then liberty is dead. It's not a number theory, it's a law and this is it's application.
The benefit in doing so is that you catch one or two methods and it is seen as inconsequential. Any method by itself can be a mistake.
It tells you where to look and what you should audit. If it is meaningless in court, it is only because they don't want audits.
It tells you where to look and what you should audit. If it is meaningless in court, it is only because they don't want audits.
Nevada has 66,000 provisional ballots, up from 6,000 in 2016. Those are tossed out if you don't show up at the courthouse the next day with ID to sign something, which they don't tell anyone about. They also hand them out like candy. They know how many in person votes they nullified and what it means.
In Oregon they dereguster people from the GOP each primary cycle just as cover up the worse things they do afterwards.
I thought i was going to sleep.
Alex Jones got something wrong and someone who listened to him hurt someone else's feelings, so decades of his work was invalidated and he was excised from the internet. That shows him what happens for saying stuff and being wrong once.
This all sounds like total bullshit, but it's easier than that. Just use checksums or hash and salt.
Let's say just print really big prime numbers, but instead of primes, it is just a series generated by a proprietary algorithm and then you store the valid numbers on a database to check against.
I don't believe a damn bit of this without proof though. That someone would call it a "watermark" or that you would have to hide it makes it sound like a giant LARP.
It's statistically obvious they did cheat though. There were perfectly deficit sized dumps 100% for Biden in both WI and MI right after they stopped counting. What's crazy is those two not being on that list.
You have the issue of huge dumps 100% for one side at 4am after counting stopped to set this current landscape though. Those were almost perfectly deficit sized dumps. They want this in court and they want us to pop off because we already have blueballs from the DOJ. I don't see how they get away with it except that they're forcing a conflict and the media will be complicit.
It's pretty well orchestrated. There may even be a swing state where they didn't meaningfully cheat that we are freaking out about because of what was already so blatant to even make it electorally close. You can take stat 101 and see what happened though. You can prove it to a confidence interval and everything. My fear is that even that kind of proof won't merit an audit in a crooked court and any kind of audit puts us past December 14. We're being written into the corner of armed conflict or GTFO. I'm not a big talker. I can say these people should get the fucking blood eagle. Doesn't mean I can do it. It doesn't mean I will try. It doesn't mean I would suggest that for anyone around here. My only copout is to say that's the military's job. I'm sorry, but it is.
Let's say we'll stop counting and then find 138k votes exclusively for Biden at 4am election night to set the stage for this current landscape of "fuck yes, I want to blow something up." Biden was going to catch up. He sure as FUCK wasn't going to win. That shit was blatant in MI and WI. Statistically impossible and traceable with any kind of record whatsoever, no audit required. Audit anyways.
I don't know what the solution is just yet, but I do know this problem is going to get solved.
NOT THE ILLEGALS. THEY HAVE TO GO BACK.
If that is what you perceive me to have meant, then maybe.
Red rover, red river.
Sir, have you heard the good word of David Chalmers?
They don't even go outside. When they do, it is to riot. Pretty easy rules of engagement there.
They're going to call it wrong twice 🤡 🤡
Evan, Evan, Evan, Evan, Evan.
Can this be cross-referenced with provisional ballots?
Trump camp isn't calling these states for optics guys.
I don't think we've seen him angry.
I meant to watch Tim Pool's stream some, but I couldn't get off of Crowder. It's just better than everything else in every category. It's the opposite of some talking head in a bedroom. No "whats up youtuberinos? Like, share and subscribe and listen to me plug stuff" just smart, funny, high-production content. It's like what TV should be.
Using the first digit is just an example. You can totally use 2nd digit. It would be handy if your sample of districts within a county all somehow had 80,000 people voting for Biden or something.