If we abandon social media platforms, then we concede victory. The correct way is to fight back and force them to censor us to prevent us from redpilling the normies.

Because enough censoring of people for stupid reasons will redpill even more normies.

Err. I wear t-shirts when it's @50 degrees outside, unless it's raining or the wind is really ripping.

Biden's older than me by a large margin, and I probably outweigh him by a good bit, but 50 degree temperatures are actually pretty comfy to a lot of people.

I use the word correctly, and with cause.

I also rarely engage in Ad Hominem attacks. You might try engaging in a discussion without logical fallacies sometime. The people you are engaging might think you are worth listening to, instead of just laughing at you as you struggle to force your beliefs into places where logic and facts can't go.

I dunno. I see the simplest explanation as being a few extremists engaging in Aloha Snackbar.

That said, I wasn't there either.

Part of being good at Politics is figuring out how to turn events in your favor. A good politician can use violence or attacks, real or perceived, against their nation as a prop to improve their image.

Putin didn't need to create the incident, he simply reacted to it in a way that made him look good to his people.

As for mysterious deaths of involved media persons. It's Russia. Putin is no angel, and if the media were digging around the edges and finding things that Putin didn't want exposed, well, enthusiastic investigation might have been a life-ending event.

(What might have happened that Putin didn't want exposed? How about orders given to the military that civilian casualties were acceptable as long as all the terrorists died? That sort of thing would sour the people against him.)

Thank you. I was not aware of this.

Truth is stranger than fiction at times.

At least India is a capitalist nation. Sure, they have their problem. Sure we compete in some industries. But we aren't political enemies.

Definitely buy from India before China, but if possible buy American first.

First, the word 'misogyny' dates from the 17th century. It is far older than Marxism, so misogyny is not a Marxist term. Stop being a tard and trying to redefine language to serve your delusions.

Second, in the top article, yes, women CAN be as violent as men. Women are also more likely to admit to being violent with their partners, and men less likely to report being the victim of violence from women. That's because most violence from women doesn't actually hurt the men they slap, punch, or throw a bowl at. That sort of violence is more of a warning or signal than an attempt to harm.

Third, in the second article, it contradicts you. "Female criminals are disproportionately outnumbered by male criminals except in cases of human-trafficking," We aren't talking about human trafficking.

Fourth, if you read between the lines of that third article that was apparently written by a soyboy psychologist trying to paint a false image of equality over reality, a great deal of the 'violence' that women use against men are 'stand-off' actions. Pushing or slapping to make a point, rather than to cause harm.

Now, don't get me wrong, women can be violent with the intent to cause harm, but even the last article you provided uses weaselwords and moving goalposts to force a point that can't stand on it's own.

I'm still chuckling because you are so desperate to defend your misogyny with science that you are proving yourself to be a shill.

I also duckducked and found a search result with a text blurb from Doggos mentioning the new site name.

It is a very valid tactic to associate flawed concepts with the people that invented them. Especially when the people in question are textbook mad scientists.

You think I am a communist infiltrator because I don't hate women? Please make that case. I'm sure other people will be amused to watch you try and justify that.

We cannot argue against leftist language abuses if we cannot reference them.

It might also be that women have historically been less likely to resort to violence to resolve problems.

Check your misogyny at the door, please.

The ones in charge just say they want collectivism. Once they gather enough power, they cull the idiots who really wanted it, and take over.

There is a difference between freedom and ignorance.

There is also a difference between doing stupid expensive bullshit to address a problem, and a common sense solution.

For atmospheric carbon, the simple answer is to simply put the carbon back underground where we got it. We can do that by stopping the recycling of paper.

Does anyone have some memory wipe?

I need to un-see this.

If you want to donate money to fight against the Biden Administration, just send money to the Texas government.

I am pretty sure no states will turn down money freely offered, but there might be some sort of special paperwork to fill out to avoid them sending non-resident money back.

Anything to hurt the US economy. The more victims they create, the more victims they can pander to with Bread and Circuses.

Cherish your delusions then. Do you believe in Santa and the Easter Bunny too?

Your understanding is flawed. The question is that of degree. The fact that burning billions of tons of oil and coal are increasing atmospheric carbon is an ironclad fact.

I somehow doubt that President Trump is going to be quiet for long. He is likely working to find a way to guarantee a social media presence that can't be shut down by cucks.

If you do not understand that pulling billions of barrels of oil and coal out of the ground and burning it will increase carbon in our atmosphere, then you need to make yourself less ignorant.

We are contributing to global warming. The degree of our contribution can be debated, but arguing about the degree of responsibility does not change facts.

As I have said before, we don't have to follow retarded Leftist bullshit ideas to slow or even reverse carbon buildup in the atmosphere. Simply stopping paper recycling would have an enormous impact.

I suspect that they were expecting Pence to do his job.

Then Pence betrayed the nation.

Yes. Because once we run out of peaceful methods of trying to fight back, things get ugly.

I hope we can avoid needing to justify the existence of the 2A but I lose more of that hope every day.