Any legal pedes around that can shed light on relevant election law?
The victors write history. Remember that. So long as the Hatestream Media continues to spout fake news, we have not won. Even after the election fraud is resolved and President Trump is sworn in a second time.
I say again, we have not won the Great Meme War until sanity returns to the press and to history texts.
The first thing Democrats did was use their appointed leadership positions in the intelligence services to try a soft coup against the President. When it became clear to everyone with half a brain that it was all bullshit, Democrats kept pressing, and this encouraged Leftists by showing that facts don't matter to their Democrat Overlords. Only political power matters to them.
The second thing Democrats did was encourage Leftists to behave in aggressive, illegal behavior. For example, ANTIFA, etc. By failing to condemn and act vigorously against violent and/or illegal actions, they clearly indicated again that laws were not important. Again, only political results matter to Democrats.
The third thing Democrats did was fail to act against social media censorship, even when social media giants began acting as publishers rather than as platforms.
The fourth thing Democrats did was fail to keep the voting systems secure in any place where they had political dominance.
In short, Democrats have, through FAILING to act as responsible caretakers of the nation, made it clear to Leftists that illegal activities which advance an Anti-American agenda are acceptable, and will be overlooked.
Finally, Democrats are offering Bread and Circuses to the masses. Free healthcare, free advanced education, and various other sorts of nanny state utopian bullshit that we might manage with Star Trek technology, but that we can't manage yet.
What this means is that Democrat leadership didn't ever need to do anything explicitly illegal. All they had to do was offer free stuff to the Leftists, then make it clear that the government, if Democrats are in charge of it, will not persecute the people who performed illegal acts to help the Democrats gain power.
The only way to stop this from working is to stop looking for the connections to the high power politicians, because those connections are not going to be clear and provable. The government needs to hammer people acting illegally for political gain into the ground. Maximum penalties and sentences. No plea bargains unless they lead to really big fish.
We WANT to hammer the big names, but we CAN hammer the little names, and make it clear that the rule of law matters.
Any legal pedes care to comment on the legality of using a state of emergency to force a second election, administered by the US military, with Japanese and Polish voting monitors, while allowing both Democrat and Republican monitors in equal numbers?
If we do a re-vote under a state of emergency, we damn well better do it right.
It's a very distributed way for a large community to check a massive number of potential fraud cases.
We all know that some of us did not vote. If you are one of those who did not vote, but there is a vote registered to you, that is critical evidence of fraud.
Don't try to pretend you didn't vote if you did though. Cameras, fingerprints, and handwriting analysis could be used to rebuke a false statement.
If the Trump campaign manages to overturn the false results caused by election fraud in PA, GA, AZ, NV, and other states, it's going to be more riots.
If we manage to get a sane majority in both houses and Trump as President, we need to enact laws to force a universal voter ID, secure voting, etc.
I suspect that whoever prepared the legitimate mailed ballots did so in a very organized fashion. That means the ballots were likely sent out in blocks, and payment to the post office would likely have been made through special accounts.
Illegitimate ballots were likely NOT prepared in official governments, and would have had postage paid by outside sources.
If some state officially paid for 500,000 mail-in ballots to be mailed, and 550,000 mail-in ballots were received, then we know two things.
First, 50k ballots are illegitimate, and second, someone paid for those 50k ballots to be mailed, and those funds might be traceable through post office records.
I have zero idea how useful this line of investigation might be, but remember... Catching criminals frequently means following the money, and this is a money trail I have not heard anyone talking about.
I now leave this in the hands of whoever thinks they can make use of the idea, you glorious, deplorable autists.
Can't wait to see the salty memes tomorrow!
Last election, Hilliary supporters whined and complained about the popular vote. We know popular vote doesn't matter, but Leftists will pretend like it does.
Shock and awe. We need to make such a powerful statement that Leftist journalists will wail and cry live on air again. We need Leftists from Hollywood to take their poisonous ideals to other nations in a mass exodus.
Anyone else notice this? Sure, I could use Duck Duck Go, and I do sometimes, but I think this intrusion by Google is an opportunity to further demonstrate how the Left is attacking the rest of the world.
Google is clearly monitoring whoever uses their browser to visit this site, and throwing bottom-popups with anti-Trump links.
I doubt it is possible for the mods to do anything to prevent Google from attempting to popup-prostheletyze us with Leftist idiocy, but it might be possible for people who know what they are doing to turn Google's attacks here against them in the public arena.
Hunter might be an idiot in many ways, but he appears to be somewhat mentally capable so long as he's kept away from the crack pipe.
I would NOT be surprised if that hard drive was purposefully abandoned with a person Hunter knew was conservative in a way that couldn't be seen as an intentional act by Hunter.
Think about it. How many Apple Store techs do you know who are conservative? Clearly there are some, but most I've seen or spoken to seem at least significantly left of center.
Now, if there are pedo pictures in there involving Hunter, then, well, I would chalk that up to crack, or perhaps poor deletion protocols. No way he'd voluntarily shoot himself in the foot like that, IMHO.
It is very possible that the internal communications of the FBI can lead us to specific individuals that need to be fired for putting Joe Biden's political career above the investigation of major crimes.
MLK quote.
"Always avoid violence. If you succumb to the temptation of using violence in your struggle, unborn generations will be the recipients of a long and desolate night of bitternes, and your chief legacy to the future will be an endless reign of meaningless chaos.
How terrible is your candidate when the only reason you can give voters to vote for them is that other people are voting for them.
Someone must be gathering data on this by now, comparing national death rates per month or quarter to pre-COVID numbers, and breaking down things like auto accidents and violent deaths to get a real picture of how dangerous COVID is.
Don't get me wrong. Africa has it's own problems. Living under a warlord or dictator is not a life most of us would ever consider. At the same time, established authoritarian governments in poverty stricken countries really couldn't give a shit about the political narratives of Leftists in the developed world.
There are issues to be considered. Classified data and NSFW content might be present in videos, but we have video editing these days, and it's not hard to do.
There is a privacy concern as well, especially prior to conviction. Again, this might be addressed with video editing.
After several cases where media false narratives have resulted in people being injured and dying, is enforced availability of arrest and confrontation video a price we are willing to pay a bit of freedom/privacy for?
What do you think? I'm on the yes side, myself.
How inconsiderate.
Since we know that the nations with the highest populations are not the richest, the "illegal aliens are good for the economy" concept is pretty stupid.
It came to my attention last week that we don't have a strong, easy to remember phrase that describes how the Left cherry-picks bits and pieces of science that supports their viewpoints, while ignoring science that does not.
It occurred to me a couple days ago that this behavior is somewhat similar to many cases of date rape.
In both cases, the violators operate under false pretenses, and after the deed is done, they normally try to legitimize their abuse by carefully constructing a set of 'facts' which creates a false narrative.
It seems to me that 'science rape' is not too vulgar, but is a powerful enough phrase that it could make some mighty fine memes.
Especially with Joepedo as the Democrat Presidential candidate in the upcoming election.