I'm correct there, too.
The Constitution does not shield, protect, legalize, ensconce, absolve, codify, indemnify, or whatever word you want to use, fraud.
What it does, as all or most legal documents do when they create processes or procedures, is presuppose that the person named as the winner of an election (or any person named by whatever process) is the actual winner of the election, and not someone being forced on that process by fraud.
If SCOTUS as arbiter of disputes about the election, or Congress, as the body named to certify the election, are either genuinely fooled by the fraud perpetrated by political parties and government employees, or if they are actually participating in the crime of election fraud (as you and I both know to be the case), that doesn't legally do anything except widen the pool of criminals who participated in that felony.
The Constitution does not make fraudulent election results legal or enforceable. Per our Constitution, no one who did not win a presidential election is in any way relevant to the Constitutionally-specified process of making someone president, full stop.
Yep.