3
Filetsmignon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Good question. It seems that nature - and the laws of physics - always have some kind of control mechanism for keeping systems from getting out of control - from uncontrolled exponential growth. Kind of like a closed-loop-control algorithm (I'm an engineer, so I can't help the analogy). For instance the climate. If it gets too hot the heat creates more water vapor which creates more clouds which cools the system back down. If too much CO2 is released plant life thrives and absorbs the CO2. Etc, etc. I think population growths have naturally functioning curbs on them just like all other natural systems. Every predator has a predator to keep populations in check. Even a lion has to survive disease and environment (drought, etc.). In most closed-loop-controls there is a sensor of some kind that triggers the feedback to change course and dampen the out-of-control growth. In humans I'm guessing gay (as a population control mechanism) is somehow triggered by the biological parents of the homo. Something in the parents switches the genetics (or something else) to produce a human who is attracted their same sex. I wonder if there are larger percentages of gay folks in certain types of populations like densely populated places, places where there is an excess of materialistic items, etc. I honestly don't know what the trigger mechanism is that produces gay, but my money is on something biologically triggered by the parents.

0
Filetsmignon 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think gay folks are biologically gay. They can't help who they're sexually attracted to any more than super straight folks. I think it's nature's way of evolving and trying things that work and don't work. In the case of gay, nature is trying something that doesn't work for procreation in order to curb over-population. I think gay is a natural correction to reduce population growth rates. As the world becomes more and more populated we'll see nature increase the percentage number of homos.

1
Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

You mean the United States (red states) kick out the blue states who are no longer following the Constitution and abiding by the law. We're not seceding, we're continuing without the lawless rebels! The USA will live on, and it will be composed of the red states.

2
Filetsmignon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just read "Grant Takes Command" by Bruce Catton. It's a really good book on the last year of the Civil War. Extremely detailed day-to-day action, letters, decisions, tactics by Grant all leading up to Appomatox. Any civil war 2.0 talkers should read it. It is the 2nd of a 2-part series, so you may want to start with "Grant Moves South" first.

3
Filetsmignon 3 points ago +3 / -0

I want to know why 50% of States aren't already just disobeying? They are independent Republics. Just give D.C. the finger and self-govern for Godsake!

1
Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Black people don't swim.

2
Filetsmignon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think it's mostly California conservatives who are flocking to Texas. They are fed up with the commie shit in that State. Keep in mind that almost the same number of Californian's voted for Trump as Texans in 2016. It's just that California has such a large population they were still totally outnumbered.

7
Filetsmignon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Signature match was completed by a scanning machine. They lowered the percentage of matching to the lowest level the machine offered. The result was that signatures that weren't even close to matching got called a match. This was done on hundreds of thousands of ballots in NV. Trump won, by a lot.

2
Filetsmignon 2 points ago +2 / -0

For once I agree with Alien Zuckeberg, you should not be on Facebook.

7
Filetsmignon 7 points ago +7 / -0

Not sure where you're getting your data points from, but you should go to coastal Commiefornia. It is amazing how the people there have bowed to their masters. Everywhere you go people are wearing masks. Everywhere. By themselves out for a walk with nobody around. Riding bikes. Driving in cars (both alone and with others with the windows up). Everywhere. Everyone. People would cross the street to passed me on an otherwise empty sidewalk. That place is quite literally Orwell's nightmare come true. Coastal Californian's LOVE their masks. I moved back to Texas.

1
Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

Anti-gun idiots can't seem to wrap their stupid heads around the logic that when a bad guy with a gun comes around the thing you want most is a good guy with a gun to counter the bad guy. They call the police (good guy with a gun). But if citizens were armed (and I'm for a certain level of required training) then they wouldn't have to wait for police to arrive. Good guys everywhere, means bad guys either refrain from doing bad things or meet instant justice from citizen good guys.

1
Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

I agree to some degree. But this is the world we live in now. As the saying goes "don't hate the player, hate the game".

2
Filetsmignon 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think the downvoters agree with 80% of what you said. It's the "2 to 3 months is too little too late. A lot of the base no longer cares" that's getting the downvotes.

1
Filetsmignon 1 point ago +1 / -0

He could license tech from Gab. That'd save a ton of time and development.

7
Filetsmignon 7 points ago +10 / -3

I can't imagine he's not already here. Hello Mr. President. You won by a lot and we stand by you! Just give us the word!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›