Sign In or Create an Account
Sooooo you're just going to segregate yourself? Awesome.
It's 2021 man. They're not trying to have a logical discussion with you. They're trying to string you along until you trip up, and if you don't they'll have you twenty responses deep where nobody's going to read anyway.
You can't win unless you leave and stop giving content and attention to them.
Sir, plz stop playing with my heart.
Well shit if I did that without knowing to Powell how the hell do I apply the same concept to the Bushes and Clintons?
"That's a good thing" //Bernie.mp3
"Don't celebrate death, that's what the enemy does, blah blah blah"
That demon is DIRECTLY responsible for the deaths of military friends as well as innocent people all around the world because he wanted to make a buck.
Good riddance to him and hopefully all of his ilk.
Have you ever thought the shit in the stories just might not be true?
Rallys. I envy you.
I'd keep it in the same category of food and just do a banana since that's apparently racist according to lefties. Then they couldn't claim escalation or some other BS.
"a college liberal went crying to WaPo because she drew a swastika on the wall of her own dorm"
This is fun.
Joseph Smith was called a Shaman
That would explain why that damn number keeps coming up.
17 huh? Not 16. Not 18.
Sounds like a game to collect as many fines as possible, then sue.
Not defending Buttjig at all. He never should've gotten the position or the benefits, obviously.
Original sin is not evident based on human nature, and if you're going to assert that you're going to have to defend it.
I see nothing in human nature that assigns guilt from ancestors' actions, so that's on you to describe. I reject it totally.
The concept of original sin, real or not, has nothing to do with personal belief and I'd argue it's totally illegitimate just as I would the idea of reparations. Just saying it's "self-evident" doesn't make it so. Original sin either exists or it doesn't, but regardless either outcome is irrelevant when debating it's nature and the reasoning surrounding it.
The entire concept revolves around being guilty or stained by something you didn't do. Reparations follows the exact same methodology. No amount of dancing around that or invoking the divine is going to change that the root ideas are almost identical.
Totally agreed on the private company/govt point, but I'd extend the govt point to include just about everything related to govt jobs. Most of them need to be eliminated, benefits and all. It shouldn't be a career, nor should it come from tax money.
As for original sin, again, that's arguing the efficacy of the solution, not the legitimacy of the concept. They're both the same concept. You're being held responsible for something you had no part in and commanded to attain "absolution" whether it's by physical payment or spiritual submission on the threat of either shame or damnation, respectively.
The discrimination is downstream from the point and completely irrelevant. They're the exact same concept. I'm being held responsible for something I didn't do and had zero power to affect or prevent.
Granted paying money is a lot better than eternal hellfire, but I digress. Both are retarded concepts.
The company I work for offers a month of paternity leave and guys are taking advantage of it. More babies is a good thing. Fathers in the home is a good thing.
Yeah, people want to bitch about kids being raised right and then scoff at ideas like paternity leave. They'll be the first ones to point out the problems in the black community stem from fatherless homes and then say something like this is only good for women. Dad being home for a bit and being incentivized to raise a family is a good thing all around if a company can afford to offer it.
Then they'll preach about how reparations is a shitty unfair idea and in the same breath try to shove God down your throat coupled with the idea of original sin; the exact same concept. "bUt oNe iS dIvInE sO iT's dIfFeReNt!!!!"
I know this is more than you asked for with your comment but I am so goddamn tired of some of the shallowbrains on this website. There's a huge percentage of people that are fucking lemmings totally absent of any critical thought no matter which side you're on. It's frustrating.
He's a mechanical engineer so he's definitely a "scientist"; just not the way he purports it.
That's a perfect cuck muzzle.