1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Both these people are in the news, both have shown conflicting actions

tulsi being the person who took kamala out of the primaries, now kamala being at the doorstep through default, id imagine theres plenty of dissent, and there are instances of this dissent coming out in the open.

You want to make claim of discouraging discussion by dismissing it as simping. and listing that the people in question are female as proof. are you 3?

do you even know what makes up that behavior? white knighting and pedestal placing.

i, presenting the two different arguments and gathering what the public view is, is asking questions as to where the people in this sphere (containing Kristi being flakey as hell, tulsi affiliating with dems + dissent) most likely fall.

lauren boebert, and MTG arent in question because everyone is pretty much in agreement that they havent shown a reason to doubt loyalty. De Santis I dont gotta worry about either. Gaetz is in an investigation for criminal activity thats looking more like a hit piece everyday- but still his loyalty doesnt need to be in question, that case is completely separate from the matter

And Alex Jones.... well he's just.... alex ya know? that low grumbly voice that can ease you to sleep, the passionate cries for justice, yet a hint of tension with that supplement bullshit to keep you on your toes because.... you dont want to be the one that let alex get away. when youre so sure about someone like that, thats when you simping. It got annoying when 'racist' lost its significance too. dont abuse it, or no one will give a shit and ya gotta find another term to apply to the behavior when someone actually does it.

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wanting to run for any position should be a "subtle" red flag. We do need leaders, but my first choices arent the people going "it should be me and here's why"

because like you said, they all want to get in the game. Bernie's ballad is pretty tragic, you see a guy who for years was on the right side of the debate, ethically ahead of obama and clinton... just to in the end take a fucking check when the time came and become a full blown commie pawn.

2
Fitzimo 2 points ago +2 / -0

it annoying when your trying to get viewpoints and other possibilities that are looked over, just for some immature normie to type in simp.

yes people do simp, it looks very different from asking "yo how do we feel about this person and what they are doing"

...8 year olds dude.

And yes, it seems like her current position works for the moment, check out U/drinklikeagilmore comment if you want to know the opinion of an actual constituent. That bill fiasco showed she doesnt have the will to break through the legislative bullshit.

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, i retain a fair amount of skepticism, if she's making waves in office ill keep the possibility in mind, that she'll pull some pence shit.

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wondering if you actually have something to contribute other than the sex of the political figure up for review. There always one. Frisco eh? go fuck the local pooper scooper

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's really helpful to know how one of her actual constituents rates her performance. Its feels like GoP still tries to push for her with media attention.

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'd say 2022 should just be for the rinos, it would be too much we tried to clean house with every buckler. 2024 is a better amount of time to give it some turnaround/or see if shes actually controlled op

-1
Fitzimo -1 points ago +1 / -2

Muh "Muh" has become oversaturated

2
Fitzimo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I hate that i actually have to put a disclaimer of "not all black people"

but BLM is current face of whatever this monster is.

4
Fitzimo 4 points ago +4 / -0

My late grandfather was mistaken for an asian dude by some neighbors, he was a darker skinned mexican.

this shit really infuriates me, its time for latino's to stand up to these nazis (sorry, we all thought it would come from the south as a second confederacy. nope, its actually black people acting like nazis as revenge for slavery) since white folks be in unstable state to do so.

I used to joke about it but now im serious. white folks will probably have "ma racis" as a white thing, only offensive when pronounced with a hard T.

2
Fitzimo 2 points ago +2 / -0

i need to get out of this line shit....... nah back up...okay ill drive through but stay out the way i wont stop for the shot.

im not going into a restaurant, where people are walking out covered in vomit either

2
Fitzimo 2 points ago +2 / -0

im not, this is a very plausible discussion topic, lots of grey area to explore. i wont shit on someone asking questions or trying to provoke thoughts outside the box.

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +2 / -1

its annoying as hell when someone cant grasp his simple teachings and just double down on their brute cockiness. "eh only cucks even give these people time of day"

i know of one mod thats like this.

2
Fitzimo 2 points ago +2 / -0

its funny how dems magically grasp the reality, and intensity of one(judgement call), when its a (supposed) republican getting the bullet...... THEEEEN they understand

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

let the purges begin! Get your Antifa Card Deck here! Prominent figures! check it out... the bike lock guy is the Jack of Diamonds.

0
Fitzimo 0 points ago +1 / -1

and the "other 10" is in reference to rinos not dems. damn dude and youre a mod? and to even to listen is an infraction?

how would any of us post and shed light to the incriminating, dumb founded bs that comes out of these other politicians mouths, without first knowing what they said, and in what context? otherwise youre no better than cnn

0
Fitzimo 0 points ago +1 / -1

cool so if your reading my other responses you can see i speculate a range of other mindsets. nice cherry picking.

and wow who knew the whole maga movement hinged on MY mind set.

-1
Fitzimo -1 points ago +1 / -2

lol

"Question."

"This question proves we're fucked"

"i cant ask a fucking question?"

"woah relax bro."

where in the post do i affirm my stance on the matter? read.

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

at least kamala's defense mec laughter has the potential to red pill people out there.

so, does it benefit us for the dems to go as deep into clown world as they can, electing the dumbest idiots for att gen, ATF head. just acting like bumbling idiots, as oppose to someone like Tulsi, trying to come off composed and balanced.

dems be acting like the intro to Dog Day Afternoon

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

ya, if she could be played effectively, and kept in check, it seems like a breach/soft under belly to their party

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +2 / -1

thing is, if you just put her next to camaltoe... the difference is just so vast. thats not saying tulsi is good, thats how fucking bad harris is.

ill listen to what tulsi will have to say... but with squinted eyes cause ill always be skeptical

0
Fitzimo 0 points ago +2 / -2

only asked the question, didnt make a stance for it or against it.

2
Fitzimo 2 points ago +2 / -0

im trying to gloss over anyone i can think of currently in office coming close to potential bi-partisanship. her take down of kamala being thwarted i wonder if there is a riff that would cause her to act out of her party lines

1
Fitzimo 1 point ago +1 / -0

i dont find her all that attractive. she tries though, that much one can say

view more: Next ›