Show me where debate is actually going on. I see only propaganda, gaslighting, grandstanding, censorship, and bad-faith "gotchas" coming from one side, and on the other side, a bunch of boomers impotently trying to debate with that. How do you debate with someone who thinks that debate itself is a social construct invented by wealthy white landowners for the purpose of consolidating their power and maintaining white supremacy?
The war is already on, you just don't see it yet. It's been an information war for quite some time. How can you suggest the war hasn't started yet when the government was literally just overtaken with a coup (stolen election)?
I dunno what you're talking about. Q's always been fringe and cringe here. The larger community looked on with skepticism and thought most of the Q BS was entertaining, but lacking credibility. If you saw otherwise, you're delusional.
We give up and forget too easily. The Democrat machine would be circling the wagons and preparing suits in every court from sea to sea. They’d be infiltrating institutions, framing people, suiciding people, etc. And we’re just like, “bummer, none of the courts will hear our case.”
They were on different grounds. Suggesting this is a case arguing for restitution of personal damages, not necessarily overturning the election. That can come later after this suit goes through discovery, jury decision, etc.
No, I don’t think they make sense at the state level. If we get the precinct level time series maybe we can drill down on the weirdness.