Each branch has its own cyber unit/division/operation/organization. Here’s Army’s: https://www.arcyber.army.mil/
Point is, they need to be consolidated under a new branch whose primary mission is to defend cyberspace.
First part of the Arizona video is a waste of time. WTF is the point. Just jump right into the meat. We don’t need mood-setting music.
Right after that you show some tweets / posts that are not up long enough to actually read. If you’re going to show them, show them. But showing them without context and without enough time to read them is just frustrating.
Transition from the intense music to the 1980s sounding public service announcement tone seems amateurish and very awkward.
When you show the anomalies of the 11/4 absentee Biden ratios, you need to take it farther. You need to call the people responsible for counting the ballots and administering the elections and get their explanation. You need to get the fact-checkers to “debunk” your claims, and then counter back. Otherwise, you’ll put this out there, someone will “debunk,” and everyone will go with that. You need to figure out what will be the main defenses, and address those. Just pointing out anomalies is not enough. You need to address the possible / most-likely explanations for those anomalies and show why they are not true.
The water-filling illustration was pathetic. The analogy is worthless unless you actually draw the analogy. Are you trying to say there was some unlimited source of absentee ballots that were only “released” when needed? If so, you need to establish that with facts, not just show a stupid cartoon. It doesn’t make the point.
All this data is coming from the Edison data scales from NYTimes, apparently. Both Edison and NYT have stated publicly that their data does not show any such vote switching or reductions or irregularities or whatever. You need to address that directly. Also, you need to figure out what was the “chain of custody” involved in Edison compiling and providing that data to NYT. Need to get Edison’s explanation for why votes went up and then back down. If we’re going to make claims of fraud based on this data, then we need to establish by the preponderance of evidence that the data is actually representative of the true, official vote counting, i.e., not some private company’s (Edison) count that may have been wrong or erroneous despite the official count being correct. You say the data is an API direct feed and the SOS uses the same data at the end, but what’s the basis of that claim? How do you know that?
Most obvious explanation is that people made mistakes in the vote counting or reporting, and then the switching or negative votes are just corrections. Need to address / debunk that somehow, based on fact.
Drill down on why the laundering only happened in some counties. Call the counties where it didn’t happen and see if they can explain why it would have happened in other counties but not theirs. Call the counties where it happened and see if they can explain why it happened in their counties and not others. Get Edison and NYT to explain why it happened some places and not others.
You show the disproportionate Biden %’s for four counties that happen to also be counties where there were vote decrements. Did the same disproportionate 11/4 Biden %’s occur in counties where there were no decrements / laundering? If so, your case is bunk. If not, then you need to say so and emphasize it.
Get more data from Edison. The data should be for sale, right? They’re a private company. Crowdfund the full set of data so we’re not cobbling together this shit from NYT. They should have precinct-level time series data. If we can get that, then we can drill down and identify which precincts this laundering came from. It’s probably not equally distributed among precincts in a county, so when you look at precinct level data, the disproportionate %’s will be more extreme and the data dumps will be worse.
You say the absentee dumps are random samples. Can you substantiate that? What would Edison and NYT and fact checkers and DNC say? What are the alternative explanations? Identify them and make a clear case for why they are invalid. Is there any plausible explanation for why the 11/4 samples would be biased for Biden? They were the largest, by far. Were they perhaps biased toward inner-city precincts?
Cut the “your vote matters” BS at the end. We know our vote matters, we don’t need to hear Biden say it. Feels partisan and propaganda-ish, which detracts from credibility. Stick to facts, make the case. Treat it like a serious issue and an unbiased, objective investigation. Look at both sides of every point.
Get someone with skills to help you with the video. Maybe Solmemes or Carpedonktum or something. Your video overall is very visually uninteresting and feels like a sex ed video from high school in the 80s.
Just checked. Not seeing it. I see a bunch of stuff about protecting satellites and other space assets. I see stuff about protecting physical assets used for communication. That’s good and important and necessary, but not what I’m talking about. I’m talking about protecting our cyberspaces. Protecting our online communities from infiltration by hostile foreign actors. Protecting our elections from foreign influence. Protecting TDW from Chinese troll farm infiltration. Don’t see that. China has an offensive organization actively attacking our cyberspaces. Who is defending them? That useless CISA bullshit? The FBI? CIA? No, sorry. We need to get serious and engage China with a cyber counter strike of Biblical proportions.
The result is already a foregone conclusion, stated in the purpose for the review: “... to further instill confidence in Georgia’s voting systems”
Not to investigate or check or make sure or anything. Simply to instill confidence in what has already been done.
Right, by “at best” I was just qualifying “goofy.” Could probably think of some worse words to describe his goofiness. But overall, despite his goofiness, the man is a veritable hero and should have statues erected in his honor and federal buildings and journalism schools named after him. Perhaps even an O’Keefe prize or something. Could only wish to have that kind of courage. Have toyed with the idea of going to work for him, but I doubt he needs my particular skill set.
Ok shill. You know I can see all your comment history, right? GTFO. DEPORT!!