3
FreeAndFairElections 3 points ago +3 / -0

This is a good time to turn up the heat on your elected representatives! Let them know we are watching and demand even more action and accountability.

1
FreeAndFairElections 1 point ago +3 / -2

I liked the evidence presented but I wished Mike would have shut the fuck up and let Dr. Frank present more details.

The main problem is Mary Fanning is listed as an Executive Producer in this one. She’s bad news.

-1
FreeAndFairElections -1 points ago +1 / -2

Doesn’t suck for me. I support Lindell too. I just think he’s getting suckered and I worry about him.

2
FreeAndFairElections 2 points ago +3 / -1

I read a post over at UndercoverDC today that has given me new insight into Wood’s and Powell’s tactics. The short of it:

They can claim Dominion is a public figure.

Thus Dominion must prove malice to win (higher bar).

Powell and Wood have been careful to stick to the details in the affidavits (and in Wood’s case his crazy Roberts stuff is word for word from the transcript of his whistleblower). The affidavits are sworn under penalty of perjury. They have every reason to believe they are true. Thus malice will never be proven.

Dominion will be stuck between a rock and a hard place. Drop a suit they can’t win and they look guilty. Can’t fight discovery easily since they are plaintiffs and they get screwed. Fight the suit all the way and lose, they look guilty.

I was worried those two had gone insane. Rethinking that now....

0
FreeAndFairElections 0 points ago +1 / -1

This is Larry Johnson.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/author/larryj/

The fact that Mary Fanning is a listed Executive Producer of Scientific Proof makes me think she and Montgomery have Lindell under their spell.

3
FreeAndFairElections 3 points ago +4 / -1

I think Lindell has some good people involved and I think some of them have the goods. But I think Fanning and Montgomery are grifters and are going to fuck up the real stuff with their con job bullshit thrown in with it.

And Lindell is clearly wrapped up in their con.

2
FreeAndFairElections 2 points ago +3 / -1

Who I am is irrelevant.

Who Larry Johnson is, is relevant. And the linked article is quite a take down of Dennis Montgomery by Larry Johnson.

1
FreeAndFairElections 1 point ago +2 / -1

I just really hope none of this is based on Dennis Montgomery and Hammer/Scorecard. If it is, this is going to backfire horribly.

0
FreeAndFairElections 0 points ago +1 / -1

Welcome my friend! Curious what woke you up and planted you here on The Donald?

1
FreeAndFairElections 1 point ago +2 / -1

Keep up the fight brother. It’s worth it.

-1
FreeAndFairElections -1 points ago +2 / -3

This is idiotic bullshit that only gullible dupes fall for.

0
FreeAndFairElections 0 points ago +1 / -1

Brother, I salute your standing up to the ignorant hordes and fighting for facts and truth. You are not alone.

0
FreeAndFairElections 0 points ago +1 / -1

The fact that the king of inappropriate violations of other peoples' personal space steps too far into a cluster of mics is shocking to you?

1
FreeAndFairElections 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yep, we are all pedes here on a MAGA mission. We can agree to disagree on this stuff and still agree on MAGA and rolling back the liberal (communist) hordes.

0
FreeAndFairElections 0 points ago +1 / -1

From two different angles simultaneously? Of separate live action content mixed in with it and (according to your theory) recorded with two more cameras at two more angles?

So, we are green screening two camera angles and live compositing two other live scenes on top of it and getting all of the angles and registration correct without any markers in the scene.

The odds are very slim of all of that being true.

view more: Next ›