I love that this article is an AP news alert, along with it having the time of writing in the future!
do they do this to have news articles set up where they can write about it?
like this is an auto-created page for journalist to pull from and write articles?
great find!
THIS is the MOST upvotes I've gotten on any of my posts too!!
Whooot!
But in all seriousness, you kinda have to get lucky to get upvotes I feel. There are so many posts hourly that its easy to get lost in the stack.
You prayed, "He win the election" I'm sorry, I thought you were another china troll, with your terrible English...
Jesus has a funny way of getting you on Technicalities.
Inventor of Email????... I HATE THIS GUY!!!!
haha but seriously though, I hate Emails, I hate that I have to use it.
But also, brag much brah? Why not just say what you need to say and let others prop your credentials?
He is right tho... sooooo it's hard to argue with him on that one. I have no degrees from MIT so that also makes me an idiot.
ehhhh they almost have balls. They don't like to report on real Controversial news, they promote red herrings to get Trump supporters to investigating a bunch of D**** pics that ended up providing negligible evidence to Actual fraud, all it did was suggest fraud. why haven't the most incriminating documents surfaced? all we discovered was that Hunter was a dirty corrupt person, and possibly a Pedo. Sure the apple doesn't fall far from the tree, but you can't exactly prosecute the father for the sun's misdeads... all it really showed was that Joe could have been strong armed.
There is actual evidence of real stories of the deep-state, that honestly is on both sides, that they refuse to report on.
They are better than the Times but they are shills compared to Project Veritas.
Until it's complete, The media will call it for Biden.
It's cute how you assume that I am old, or even that old people don't understand "new technology" because it's "scary"
The reality is, Tech companies only have power because we give them power. Nothing in Life is free, it cost a lot of money to run Facebook, and Google, and Amazon, and Twitter. The cost of the servers, firewalls, software developers to build the code, app development, etc. It is very expensive to run a social media platform, just ask Donald.win, you have to make sure that you aren't getting DOS'd, and make sure there aren't any backdoors... I could go on...
If it is so expensive for these Tech Companies to maintain a social media platform/publisher, how are they some of the richest companies in the world? I'll tell you it's not from the silly ads that pop up next to your page. They make this money from you, you and your sweet ignorance. The funny thing is that Facebook has so much information on you they know what you are likely to eat for lunch. Tracking EVERYTHING you do just by allowing an app on your phone you accept their terms and agreements that give them access to you photo's contacts, location, text messages, accelerometer (that's the thing that measures which direction your phone is tilting) , Microphone, camera,etc. they know when you are walking sitting, watching Youtube, eating, they know your sleep cycle, they know EVERYTHING.
not only that but because you allowed them access to your contacts because you wanted to "find more friends" they now have data on people that didn't authorize Facebook to have, names, contact information, associations, etc. this allows them to make ghost profiles of people who have never even had a facebook account, and then allows them to sell that person to advertisers too.
This is complaining that Facebook is censoring "GlobalNews,ca" and a "hack" to get it in your feed. If you really want it in someones social feed then join a competitor and promote them. The only way to stop the censorship is to show their investors they are losing people because of it. Businesses don't really have a political agenda, they want to make money. If they can beat up on a group of people and not lose that group of people to gain more opposing people because the group of people being beat up on are too weak to leave, that's a win-win.
So Get off of Facebook, and Twitter, and Google, they don't deserve your "money." Or stay on there and let them continue to push you around, I don't care.
that shit is 86 pages long! I don't have time for that.
I know I'm what's wrong with America.... but I ain't into that legal stuff. give me some numbers!
Or just get the F** off facebook.
instead of county you mean district.
Bucks county has 304 districts, this could be the case.
http://www.buckscounty.org/government/administration/ChiefClerk/BoardofElections/PollingPlaces
I don't know html or Javascript, if someone else does please speak up.
looking into the element file.pdf ... $$src="http://www.buckscounty.org/docs/default-source/boe/2020generalelectionsampleballots.pdf" stream-url="chrome-extension://mhjfbmdgcfjbbpaeojofohoefgiehjai/0637e5a3-4c93-415e-b9a4-dbf8544d75d5" headers="Accept-Ranges: bytes Cache-Control: public, max-age=7776000 Content-Disposition: inline; filename=2020generalelectionsampleballots.pdf Content-Length: 71664024 Content-Type: application/pdf Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:18:44 GMT Expires: Mon, 08 Feb 2021 14:18:45 GMT Last-Modified: Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:15:54 GMT Server: Microsoft-IIS/10.0 X-AspNet-Version: 4.0.30319 X-Powered-By: ASP.NET " background-color="0xFF525659" top-toolbar-height="56" javascript="allow" full-frame="">
Looks like it was uploaded on the 27th of October.
http://www.buckscounty.org/docs/default-source/boe/2020generalelectionsampleballots.pdf
The original link could be "updated" because of the "svrn=..." but who knows.
That is really strange, 304 copies of just the front side of the election ballot. The ballot says "official" on it though the link says "sample" ballot
Why would a "Sample" ballot need 304 pages of just one side?
possibly, but what if they needed to be sure.
They needed to know what names to put on the ballots, so they needed to know who didn't vote. that's an easy check and see. They could have had prefilled out ballots in the places they felt would be close, and then all they had to do was use a name of someone who didn't vote. It's harder to track if the voter is eligible but didn't vote. the problem is they may have ran out of names so they also went to dead people.
I know it's a bit conspiracy-ey but it does make one think. If i was committing a crime like this I would want to cover my tracks as much as possible. using real ballots is one way to do that.
Not necissarily, News sites want to keep you on their own page so instead of linking to the organization's website for further analysis, they link to a search term that will bring up their stories on the organization.
The watchdog's actual website is: https://publicinterestlegal.org/
This story is an older story, back in September, but it does show Pennsylvania's propensity to have fraudulent votes.
Not saying it's not relevant but maybe should have put a "Remember: Judicial Watch... last month" or something.
This story was written almost a month ago...
What state, what county? needs more context. Some states have this but others may not.
agreed, But how many people are still watching Fox News even after they screwed their viewers for the umpteenth time? I don't like to think that most Americans are smarter than a jackass but the more I interact with people the more I question that viewpoint.
This is effing hilarious! made me chuckle in a stressful time, Thanks!
I actually agree with Tim here, If Biden won LEGALLY, with REAL votes then Biden won... but He won't win if the votes are ACTUALLY counted. Not that I really trust the DOJ to do their job, they haven't so far.
This happened in 2018, can show that this has happened before, but a disclaimer should be made. This is not "current" news.
Especially because Biden still gets their vote...
proof, we are a skeptical crew. The media lies to us, the left tries to infiltrate. This is not how we do things. Unless you have proof post this on facebook to gain bull shit traction.
Never heard of Rumble.com what is it?