2
FreedomDeliveries 2 points ago +2 / -0

nah they won't be ddosing they will be trying to infiltrate and harvest all user and accessor info. DDOS will all come through shells around the world connected to multiple different sitting politicians and will happen at times of peak activity and during any major event or protest.

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

It's not tit for tat at all. They never have found any illegal or unethical deeds by Trump, and yet there are HUGE numbers of them by Biden and his family. They should absolutely be impeaching him on day one of having the ability, but it is in no way a tit for tat.

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

unsure if you have any idea what you're talking about or which side you're referencing based on your handshake. It's called lurking... apparently with the death of reddit we also killed the last vestiges of the old internet and how it worked.

2
FreedomDeliveries 2 points ago +2 / -0

because health! you must take a vax and give it to your kids that has known short term side effects that include death now and within 5-10 years, and no knowledge of the long term side effects! also you should force your child into being a different gender despite that meaning they have a 50-70% chance of committing suicide before age 20! IT'S FOR YOUR [email protected]!!!

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

well that's a russian article about an idiotic nyt warmongering article. if they are worried about Russian aggression (which they should be unless they would welcome it) they would want added connection to other western nations. It sounds like the author is of the idea that they are already russian servants (energy dependent etc) and so don't risk invasion as long as they don't have too many western ties.

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

that's a hard argument to make. since the humanity of a woman should not be considered less than a man. an easier one would be "only property owners should vote" since they bear significant tax burden based often based on vote and they have a marked literal 'stake' in the country. the problem then becomes that we have allowed foreign entities to buy our land esp china and so should they now be allowed to vote? ha no

4
FreedomDeliveries 4 points ago +4 / -0

yea he's old and stuck in the ways of what he views things should be from 20+ years ago. has not realized the change in the left and the needed change in the right.

2
FreedomDeliveries 2 points ago +2 / -0

sooo illegal votes... votes that cannot be proved as the law dictates burden of proof is on the ballot, not on the challenge. it's just more example of how the laws aren't wrong in many states, it's the voting authorities and the DAs and AGs who won't enforce the law. they pretent it's to keep from disinfrachising voters. guess what, I'M FUCKING DISINFRANCHISED WHEN YOU ALLOW ILLEGAL VOTES AND ILLEGAL VOTERS! every damn legal voter is. every citizen of the united states should be considered a legal voter capable of navigating the voting system in their state and voting legally. IF YOU ALLOW ILLEGAL VOTES AND NO ACCOUNTABILITY YOU ARE DISINFRANCHISING THEM!

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

if even 10 percent of the carriers who have already voted for a certain candidate with their union "lose" 10% of the ballots they are delivering or picking up (that as we saw in California recently will likely be very easy to differentiate between left and not left) that is over a million ballots. more realistic numbers probably 30% of them losing 80% of the ballots contacted. so we're looking at a 15-20 million ballot swing.

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

i'm not read up on it tbh, but a quick search for "problems with the 19th amendment" revealed a myriad of MSM links including CNN and MSNBC which tbh makes me assume it's good.

3
FreedomDeliveries 3 points ago +3 / -0

agreed. a time for reporting must be decided on since apparently elections should be held over a months time and have no time limit on how long they can "count".

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

russia has first strike advantage, far overmatch vs all of europe, has studied and formed their technology, tactics, and processes specifically to counter the main threats they have observed us using since ww2. they also have tactical nukes (that the west inexplicably gave up for no real reason other than self-gratifying flagellation) that they believe could be used to deescalate a conflict after pitched warfare has commenced but before they are exhausted in a drawn out fight against the west.

You're not totally wrong, but you should revaluate just how high a threat russia poses and what could happen, i think.

1
FreedomDeliveries 1 point ago +1 / -0

when someone takes a greater than lethal amount of a drug and than fights the cops before undergoing a detainment and control method that has been used thousands of times throughout the country and world... there is an obvious conclusion and a political one.

view more: Next ›