This was so posted by a boomer.
The Muslims would just fuck your women and humiliate your nation, Mr. boomer. What's funny about that?
These people exist to lure the ignorant in and gatekeep them from finding their way to A) proper Christianity, which Ben Shapiro would call anti-semitic and dangerous, and B) nationalism, which Ben Shapiro would call evil and inferior to civic nationalism. This way they keep people from choosing a side in the identitarian and cultural war and instead keep them busy discussing politics (which is only a relevant discussion in a homogeneous nation). They are literally fighting for the other side, the democrats and POX. Wolves in sheep's clothing. If you promote them, you aid them in their toxic subversion tactics. You clearly understand this. This is why, in the West, we would have things like blasphemy laws. If you don't tow the line, you should absolutely be treated as the enemy and have your voice silenced. Because remember what the other side is. They are cannibalistic satanopedophiles. You don't give these people an inch.
Stop noticing things
Is that really the same woman as this?
https://infogalactic.com/info/File:Melinda_Gates_-_World_Economic_Forum_Annual_Meeting_2011.jpg
It's possible he's married to a tranny look alike. His kids look like the mother. I don't think Bill is a woman.
No, you are a binary thinker who fail to apply the idea appropriately. If your mother walks out of the room, you can know that she still exists because you can walk out of the room and find her. That's object permanence. Here we are talking about raindrops and light that we cannot possibly measure and have never measured. Does it exist or not? That topic is not answered by referring to object permanence.
Here's Martin van Creveld spouting the same exact concept as I am, and that guy is far more intelligent than both of us: http://www.martin-van-creveld.com/back-to-the-beginning/
Starting at least as far back as Laplace—much earlier, if one cares to go back all the way to Epicurus—scientists have been arguing that consciousness grew out of the matter that preceded it. Not so, says Dr. Lanza: no natural process known to us could have performed that feat. Instead, he says, it was consciousness which gave rise to the world—so much so that, without the former, the latter could not even have existed.
To understand what he meant, take the popular riddle concerning a tree that has fallen in a forest with no one there to witness the fact. did it make a sound? Of course it did, say ninety-nine percent of those asked. Not so, say Dr. Lanza and a few others. The splintering of the trunk and its crash on the ground certainly gave rise to vibrations in the surrounding air. However, in the absence of anyone to receive those vibrations in his or her ears, transmit them by way of the acoustic nerves, and process them with the help of the brain, they would not have amounted to what we know as sound.
What applies to hearing applies equally well to our remaining senses. What the specialized neurons in the back of our brains register is not the world’s existing, objective, sound, light, and impact. On the contrary, light, impact, and sound are created by those neurons. To adduce another example, a single rainbow that can be seen by everyone who looks in the right direction at the right time does not exist. What does exist are trillions of raindrops. Each one carrying a potential rainbow; and all “waiting” to be discovered by animal sense organs and brains to be brought to bear on them. Instead of the internal and external world being separate and independent of one another, as Descartes would have it, they are merely two sides of the same coin. That, incidentally, is also the best available explanation for the riddle of quantum mechanics where, as far as we can make out, the speed and position of elementary particles seem to be determined by the fact that they are or are not observed.
This premise serves Dr. Lanza as the foundation on which to build everything else in the book, leading up to the conclusion that “the universe burst into existence from life [which is the seat of consciousness], not the other way around.” What I personally found most interesting in it is the following. We present-day humans are immensely proud of our scientific prowess. And rightly so, given that it has enabled us to study, and often gain some understanding of, anything from the bizarre submicroscopic world of elementary particles that exists right under our noses to gigantic galaxies more than thirty billion light years away. Dr. Lanza’s contribution is to point out that, without taking account of consciousness and the life with which it is inextricably tied, we shall never be able to understand reality as a whole.
"There's zero evidence of anything outside the material."
Yes, precisely. So the raindrops and the light, none of it exists unless you can measure it. The observant makes it real, and his reality consists of what he can measure. It's not real because it's material, but because you, the observant, can measure it.
No, I don't believe in magic. You think this binary retardation scores you any points? It makes you look incredibly stupid. I believe that there are wicked people who are superstitious and believe in things like magic. And that these people are prone to engaging in evil activities, such as cannibalism or child sacrifice or bestiality.
But what part of the raindrops and the light? They wouldn't be visible. You couldn't hear them. You couldn't measure them in any way. What part would be left? What separates that "something" from non-existence?
Whatever your answer is, it doesn't matter. The fact is, most of our shared experience of reality is what we can see, hear, touch, feel and measure. It's not the material world. That's only a teeny tiny part of our reality, assuming it plays a role at all. So you can say that the rainbow doesn't exist, that's it all material. But you would be lying to yourself.
Okay, let's use your numbers then. The wikipedia estimate. 35 000 people killed throughout the whole of Europe after receiving a trial, over the span of 300 years. That's roughly 116 people a year. At the time, there were around 60-70 million people in Europe. That's less than 0,0002% of the population (one in every 500 000). Compare that to 186 abortions to every 1000 live births in the US. Or the 100 million deaths due to communism over the last century. Big whoop even if you condone the witch trials (which I do).
The rest I won't even bother to address. It's too broad a topic.
No, they're not entirely material. If there hadn't been anyone there to measure the raindrop and the light in the first place, what would be left of their existence? The fact of the matter is, every single raindrop is carrying a potential rainbow which is just "waiting" to be discovered by a conscious being.
Yeah, you can have advanced societies without Christianity. You can rank them on a scale. The more it likens a Christian society, in morality and philosophy, the more advanced it will be.
"Rape is wrong because it causes harm to at the very least one other member of the society, and because we can empathize with the victim and understand it's not something we'd like done to us."
Whatever maaan. That's just like... your opinion. If people genuinely believed that there is no God, what incentive would they have to accept this line of thinking? You are just one guy with a voice.
You don't find it convincing because, like I said, you have a personal vendetta against Christianity. It's so obvious, because anyone who genuinely cares about truth, reason and morality would see that Christianity is not like other religions in this regard. We are your closest ally in the world, and yet you treat us like your mortal enemy. No other religion even discusses these things. It's all about doing the rituals and following the scriptures. We invented science. We ended the slave trade. We out bred the rest of the world. We founded numerous high trust societies. The witch trials? 3000 people died in the whole of the Spanish Inquisition (which lasted over 300 years years). 13 of them were witches. Read some history.
I'm a slave to the good, the beautiful and the true. Things like the rainbow. That's God. It's not part of the material world. In the material world, the rainbow is merely light being fractured as it passes through raindrops. But it's real, it's beautiful and it's there nonetheless. You can ignore it all you want. It doesn't make God any less real.
Without God, you have no society alright? There's no morality outside of the good, the beautiful and the true. You need to be able to say that rape is wrong, because we can all recognize that it's wrong. It's an objective part of reality. But you can't do that if you don't acknowledge God. It's all "just your opinion". It's all subjective. Because in the material world, it doesn't matter. A rock doesn't care about rape.
I hope this clarified some things for you.
Yes you are. You are a slave to the material world. That makes you a pagan.
What? Burning witches and keeping slaves, that's below the pagans?
You have a personal vendetta against Christianity. There's no winning a debate with you people. You are SJW.
The swamp is deep.
Algorithms will always be wildly racist. AI is incompatible with liberalism. Keep in mind that the algorithms behind these ads have most likely already been heavily modified by Google.
Carlos Maza is going to call this homophobic.
Where are the civnats? I want to hear them say that if we believe in a multiracial society hard enough, if we only put aside our hatred and bigotry and call out the left for being "the real racists", these stories will go away.
I love this following quote from the Game of Shadows. It rings so true with what you will find if you read a bit of history:
You see, hidden within the unconscious is an insatiable desire for conflict. So you are not fighting me so much as you are the human condition.
Fighting hatred is a lost cause. Pick a damn side already or stay out of the way.
It's not really a "side quest" when it's not optional.
And why should the French cuck to Islam in a cultural clash such as this one? The French are not muslim. They don't need minorities and they certainly don't need Islam to sustain their civilization. The minorities, however, depend on the French for everything. So when the French tell them to dance, they better fucking dance.
Not as evil as the people in power.
Why do I find this hilarious?
Obeying and complying doesn't make you a better person. In these times it makes you a damn coward. A lot of people in prison should not be there, and a lot of people outside of prison should have been burnt at the stake.
They look like a family of goblins.
This guy doesn't exist
There is truth to this, because many of the people who wear a mask do so out of fear of losing their job, their friends, their reputation, etc.
I bet even his mom lost a little respect for him after he pulled this act. What kind of a man is so insecure he has to ask for permission to post a video every day from the people who follow him?