7
Fruit_Wrinkle 7 points ago +7 / -0

they're not planning to hide any of their disdain, either.

and neither should you

1
Fruit_Wrinkle 1 point ago +1 / -0

guarantee most people here couldnt pass a pft on the spot

-1
Fruit_Wrinkle -1 points ago +3 / -4

i spent 3.5 yrs deployed overseas from 04-08 and i came home twice. some natty guard spending a night in a parking garage in the US isnt the end of the world yall making it out to be. we stored bodies in freezers from suicide. i watched guys destroy themselves from the helplessness they felt. yall using this as political ammunition like the establishment, like some weak ass pussies

3
Fruit_Wrinkle 3 points ago +3 / -0

That would be a smart move. Play nice so the gop acquits and then turn his back on them like they did to him. He did write a chapter on revenge.

5
Fruit_Wrinkle 5 points ago +9 / -4

Jim Jordan has been taking big techs money for years. Tucker blew him up a few weeks ago about his inaction on censorship. He’s a weasel like the rest

-5
Fruit_Wrinkle -5 points ago +8 / -13

It’s not “never” but going to a protest at this moment reeks like a trap

0
Fruit_Wrinkle 0 points ago +1 / -1

It wasn’t federal property at that point. SC seceded and it’s in Charleston bay. Also stop being such a pussy

1
Fruit_Wrinkle 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’m not advocating for anything. I’m just stating my perspective on history.

0
Fruit_Wrinkle 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not one person died as a result of that attack. I think there was a munition accident that resulted in a death during the surrender. Lincoln’s call to arms resulted in other states secession from the union. War was brewing long before the election of 1860. The north wanted to expand westward and create free states. Which meant 2 more senators in Washington. It culminated with the 1860 election where Lincoln wasn’t on the ballot in 10 states. The south felt it didn’t have representation in Washington, if you can’t see the parallels between the politics on the mid 1800’s and today with the statehood of DC and PR then you may just be ignorant. Brainwashed by high school history books.

0
Fruit_Wrinkle 0 points ago +1 / -1

Not one person died as a result of that attack. I think there was a munition accident that resulted in a death during the surrender. But SC seceded already at that point and that fort was theirs in their mind and they gave plenty of notice to surrender.

5
deleted 5 points ago +6 / -1
24
deleted 24 points ago +28 / -4