3
Fuhqreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

DAS RAYCISS! Yo facts hurt my feelings!

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judge sentenced me to 1 day in Jail, 2 years probation, and anger management. Appealing

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Judge slapped me with 1 day jail, 2 years probation, and 6 months anger management.

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I am due to appear in court for trial tomorrow morning [2/8/21] at 9:30am. I truly thank you for writing all of this down. I have forwarded it to my Public Defender. But he has been unwilling this far, to even submit my motion to dismiss under color of law. (See Below) I may have to release my council and ask for an appeal if trial does not go well tomorrow

I would like to motion to dismiss, 'with prejudice', Complaint/Case #: *******971 because it is a 'deprivation of rights under color of law', and actual federal CRIME to 'make or enforce' under USCs 18-241 & 242, and an actual civil 'offense' to even 'neglect to prevent' under USCs like 42-1983 & 1986, BECAUSE: "We hold these truths to be self-evident", that "the supreme Law of the Land" was ordained and established "to... establish Justice... and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity", and in Az. "to protect and maintain individual rights", and that the US. Supreme Court HAS 'clearly established' that "We the People" need ONLY "state ...true full name" for police when there IS "probable cause" to accuse us of an actual "crime" (See 'Corpus Delicti' doctrine, US.Supr.Ct., and Purpose of gov. in Az. Const and Preamble to US. Const), and that there MUST be actual or 'probable' harm to another Humans equal 'individual rights' for a 'crime' to exist (See US. Supr. Ct. cases like: Allen v. Wright, Tyler v. Judges..., California v. San Pablo, etc.), this means ALL HARMLESS Civil and Criminal "offenses" are actually "deprivation of rights under color of law", and I can file a lawsuit now against this State for what Tempe Police have said more than once is "over 90% of what [they] do"! Therefore, I DEMAND that this case be dismissed "with prejudice" IMMEDIATELY, otherwise this Judge and Prosecutor and everyone responsible by "intent or inexcusable neglect" may find THEMSELVES as the "Defendant" in Federal Court for "deprivation of rights under color of law", and even for just "neglect to prevent" the same!" IN THE PRESENT CASE, THE CHARGES ARE: "STATE’S OFFER: Count 1 A.R.S. 13-2904A3 Abusive Language Jail Confinement - Flat 180 days. Unsupervised Probation, 36 months. , Fine 500.00" " 13-2904. Disorderly conduct; classification ... 3. Uses abusive or offensive language or gestures to any person present in a manner likely to provoke immediate physical retaliation by such person; or ..." https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/02904.htm The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled in many cases that the 'right to free speech' DOES include the 'right' to 'insult' or 'offend' people, and that a 'crime' requires all three 'elements' starting with 'injury or harm' to the equal 'individual rights' of another Human being by 'intent or inexcusable neglect' and the violation of valid criminal law, but there is no 'probable' evidence of any actual 'injury or harm' to any other Humans 'individual rights' other than the claim of 'abusive or offensive language', which IS an actual 'right' under 'the supreme Law of the Land' and 'the common law', making 'all criminal prosecutions' such as this 'to the Contrary' of the 'fundamental principles' of 'Law' and therefore an actual 'crime' called 'deprivation of rights under color of law' to 'make or enforce' for which Public Servants in the U.S. are personally liable for even 'neglect to prevent'! THEREFORE IF THIS CASE IS NOT DISMISSED IMMEDIATELY THIS JUDGE AND PROSECUTOR(S) AND EVERY PUBLIC SERVANT RESPONSIBLE MAY BE PROSECUTED FOR FEDERAL CIVIL AND CRIMINAL 'OFFENSES'! See also: https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/declaration-transcript https://usconstitution.net/const.html https://www.azleg.gov/constitution/ https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights#Report-a%20Violation https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law https://www.azleg.gov/ars/13/02412.htm https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/242 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1983 https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1986 https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/468/737/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/179/405/ https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/149/308/

3
Fuhqreddit 3 points ago +3 / -0

Or was it the hundreds of thousands of ballots flown in from out of state?

2
Fuhqreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is this saying, "Go quietly into the night."?

2
Fuhqreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

We can not cede ground and draw new lines. The left will always seek control through corruption. Like any poison, it will seep in and ruin any new state we attempt to found. They must be removed, root and stem.

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Must he also issue a command for all insurgents to disperse? Prior to executing the IA?

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

7th grade, almost! And I can't stand our teachers their all liberal faggots

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why did parler blow up instead of GAB?

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

Basically saying that Trump had to let it go this far to find the source of all the money. And on the 20th the arrests for treason begin

1
Fuhqreddit 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've been trying all 3 of these all day. None work.

2
Fuhqreddit 2 points ago +2 / -0

it's a godamn shame the criminals in DC told us we arent' allowed to bring firearms. Imagine 4-5 million armed patriots ready to storm the fucking bastille and hang the traitors.

view more: Next ›