Based on what I've seen I'd be shocked if he can plan effectively for anything beyond today. He doesn't seem all there

I'm pretty sure you can pay a company to do this for real. Would be neat to have a bunch of pro Hong Kong fortune cookies thrown into your bag at your local Chinese restaurant

Wait that's not the impeachment, that's a trainwre...

Ohhhh

You can send me $10 instead and I'll do my best to entertain you.

Edit: don't support Ukraine corruption

State senator

I feel sorry for Joe, this man needs help. Does he actually know he's running for president? Did the Dems grab him out of a hospital and force him to run just so they'd have a "moderate"

Excellent work

What would be nice is if people would just not upvote it

They are still waiting for their telegrams

The supposed "anti-free speech on TDW" narrative is weak. This site is a hell of a lot more open than all of the sites mentioned in your own post. If you get banned here it's super likely you deserved it

Sometimes, Crowder is genuinely hilarious. Sometimes Crowder is serious. But all times he gets a squeaky high pitch in his Crowder Closes segments.

It looks especially bad when he advocated for getting kids to put down the record players

It's ok, he just gummed her

Yeah except the snails are dead

Can we talk for a second about the No Malarkey slogan.

Does he know what year it is?

It's only hate speech if you are a they/them with purple/blue hair

Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition

U da real hero

So dumb, just stand in line and feel dead INSIDE like a normal person

The party of science

Alright, is this for real? I've been here too long, I actually can't tell if this is just a fantastic subtle meme, or if Joe has lost his mind completely.

Yeah but his campaign slogan doesn't really make sense: "Two girls with green eyes!"

Where's that video where Obama accidentally calls his wife Michael?

I more or less accept your premises.

I just dislike when people claim that science alone will give us morality, when that's absolutely not the case. Science gives us information, but our religious upbringing informs us how to act on that information. I think we need both. Two sides of a coin.

Also, the better religious scholars out there understand that science is a way for people to better understand the world that God has created, and a way to bring us closer to him. Fighting against logic and reason is no better than fighting against God himself.

One thing that is extremely clear in the Bible is that we do not know everything, and we are often wrong. Through this framework, there is nothing science can disprove about God. God exists, and science can only help us better understand how it all comes together.

Sorry for being preachy, I usually avoid conversations about my religious beliefs, but it just seemed like it might help if I explain why I don't feel there is a conflict between the two.

As someone that is both religious and believes in science, I think the OP cartoon was funny. It's not necessarily anti-science, but more showing the hypocrisy of how that argument is framed.

Approaching the Bible like a precise historical account or scientific document is a mistake. There is plenty of value in the Bible, and it all has to do with humanity. There is a great deal of insight, and whether you believe in it or not, you are benefitting from it's existence.

Not trying to dismiss other religious texts, there is plenty of good in many religions, but having more experience with Christianity it's just easier for me to interface with. The Bible is a story that reveals truths about us.