0
GEOTUSSUPREME 0 points ago +7 / -7

This is not the kind of call I'd expect from someone who has a gameplan to win on the 6th

-2
GEOTUSSUPREME -2 points ago +9 / -11

people focusing on these red herrings, is like being trapped in a sea of god damn lemmings as they march their way into a Biden presidency because we're focusing on this shit that's for theater and not gonna change anything. so YOU fuck off.

1
GEOTUSSUPREME 1 point ago +15 / -14

people who say shit like 'not tipping his hand by withholding evidence' think this is a fucking movie, where lawyers can just drop evidence at the last second the blows the case wide open. OUR LEGAL SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!

In our system, the accused have the right to review the evidence you are presenting against them well before the actual trial. Love it or hate, that's how it works. Evidence under oath is more powerful than evidence not under oath. the time to present earth shattering evidence was weeks ago. ON PAPER. not on god damn twitter.

0
GEOTUSSUPREME 0 points ago +5 / -5

he'll present the evidence... house democrats will ignore it... Biden will get certified and then we'll start planning the Jan 20th protest... nothing will happen then either.

-1
GEOTUSSUPREME -1 points ago +1 / -2

because I'm not a commie shill like you

-7
GEOTUSSUPREME -7 points ago +8 / -15

there is no reality in which Trump loses this forums support

0
GEOTUSSUPREME 0 points ago +1 / -1

I think they mean various state legislators/governors. Which is true, they did technically certify by the safe harbor date

1
GEOTUSSUPREME 1 point ago +2 / -1

So in order for evidence to be presented, Pence has to first count the illegal votes. Otherwise the evidence won't make it to the floor to begin with because Hawley will have nothing to object to... so this tweet implies to me that the pence card isn't gonna happen. Our fate is in the hands of the democrat majority house voting to toss out Biden votes.

2
GEOTUSSUPREME 2 points ago +3 / -1

"Allegedly" "stay tuned" "big things coming" I've heard it all before. Wake me up when something actually happens.

and yeah it's like you said. They aren't certified. state trooper or not.

I have nothing against Pence, if anything I'm defending him from the inevitable hate he gets from people who don't understand he can't do anything to stop it. He can't choose to be a turncoat, and he can't change the results. Only the senate and the house combined can.

4
GEOTUSSUPREME 4 points ago +7 / -3

even if he wanted to, he can't. So much misinformation is circulating around what the VP can or can't do. We would need the governor to certify a competing set of electors in 3 swings states, and not even one of them has.

0
GEOTUSSUPREME 0 points ago +3 / -3

it's purely symbolic

2
GEOTUSSUPREME 2 points ago +3 / -1

really skipping out on the detail that this requires the house to sustain the objection (it won't) is really misleading

1
GEOTUSSUPREME 1 point ago +3 / -2

If one chamber objects and one chamber sustains, it reverts to the governors certified electors. (meaning a Biden victory) People are going to shit on Pence for not doing anything, because they aren't smart enough to know that he can't do anything even if he wanted to.

1
GEOTUSSUPREME 1 point ago +2 / -1

If you want to suicide by DC police, that's your business. If you want me to risk my neck, yeah I'm gonna demand a specific plan. I want details on how it can succeed. We're not just trying to change a god damn baseball teams name and the comparison tells me you're not taking this seriously.

1
GEOTUSSUPREME 1 point ago +2 / -1

Alright, best case scenario then. Let's say you're right and the capitol building is stormed and taken over. I don't think that'll happen but, I'll go with you for now.

First, they'll retreat in unmapped tunnels. So at best, a historic building will probably get trashed and the meeting will take place virtually at a later date, and nothing will be achieved.

But, let's say I'm wrong again and you're correct, they storm the place and capture all senators and all house members from both sides of the isle. Do you think the military/police will just let armed civilians start making demands of elected officials at gunpoint with total impunity just because they're Americans? Or that anything achieved at gunpoint will be upheld?

I just don't understand why anyone believes anything good will come of it, unless they themselves are shills trying to incite violence

1
GEOTUSSUPREME 1 point ago +2 / -1

Different time, different setting, different war. If you dropped a million vietcong on the streets of DC, I don't think they'd stand a chance either

6
GEOTUSSUPREME 6 points ago +8 / -2

Look back further, I was anti-doomer for a good fucking while because I believed all the pollyanna bullshit. Same people that said SCOTUS would go for us are now saying a bunch of untrained civilians with guns are gonna overturn the biggest military in the world and are just fucking making up laws about electoral process.

I'm sick of the bullshit, and if you had a brain you'd be sick too

11
GEOTUSSUPREME 11 points ago +16 / -5

The short answer is... no. People acting like a VP can just decide who wins really don't think too hard about the kind of chaos that would cause in American history if it were actually true. They act like house democrats are going to be intimidated by a march, or people are just gonna storm into the building and force democrats to vote the way they want at gunpoint.

To get votes tossed you have to have a majority in the house and senate, otherwise the governor certified results get counted.

It's all copium and security blankets. Frankly, I don't see a real viable path as much as I'd love to be wrong.

6
GEOTUSSUPREME 6 points ago +7 / -1

contingent elections only happen in ties, if states are tossed out, it's still whoever has a majority. so frustrating that no one seems to understand this

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›